It is currently 17 Mar 2018, 07:45

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Government officials announced that restrictions

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 524
Concentration: Technology, Other
Government officials announced that restrictions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2015, 06:06
6
KUDOS
45
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

59% (01:10) correct 41% (01:30) wrong based on 1614 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Government officials announced that restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciative increase in the level of the river resulted from the intermittent showers that had fallen throughout the area the day before .

(A) restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciative increase in the level of the river

(B) restricting the use of water would continue because there had not been any appreciative increase in the river's level that

(C) the use of water would continue to be restricted because not any appreciable increase in the river's level had

(D) restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciable increase in the level of the river had

(E) Using water would continue being restricted because not any appreciable increase in the level of the river
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

--------------------------------------------------------
Regards

Manager
Joined: 15 Feb 2015
Posts: 113
Re: Government officials announced that restrictions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2015, 07:05
2
KUDOS
'Appreciable ' is the correct usage.

That leaves us with D and E. Between those options, in E ' because NOT any' sounds awkward, so does ' would continue Being'. Hence, D is the winner.

Hope that helps!

Please give kudos if that helped
Manager
Status: Manager
Affiliations: Manager
Joined: 06 Nov 2012
Posts: 167
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Sustainability
Schools: Boston U '19 (D)
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q49 V33
GPA: 3
WE: Supply Chain Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Government officials announced that restrictions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2015, 04:42
4
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Government officials announced that restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciative increase in the level of the river resulted from the intermittent showers that had fallen throughout the area the day before .

D)restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciable increase in the level of the river had

I am not convinced with D. How Can there be two Past perfect in a single sentence ?

Shouldn't there be simple past 'Resulted' instead of 'Had resulted' as Increase in level obviously would occur after showers had fallen ?
_________________

Hard-work, Perseverance and Commitment.....

Director
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 600
Schools: Cambridge'16
Re: Government officials announced that restrictions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2015, 06:07
1
KUDOS
it is reporting sentence that is why one needs to use Past Perfect in place where in direct speech would use Past Simple
VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1357
Re: Government officials announced that restrictions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2015, 08:02
in d, there are twoo had done in one sentence

problematic
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2014
Posts: 92
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 450 Q27 V21
GPA: 3.47
Re: Government officials announced that restrictions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2016, 18:32
3
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
JarvisR wrote:
Government officials announced that restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciative increase in the level of the river resulted from the intermittent showers that had fallen throughout the area the day before .

A)restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciative increase in the level of the river

B)restricting the use of water would continue because there had not been any appreciative increase in the river's level that

C)the use of water would continue to be restricted because not any appreciable increase in the river's level had

D)restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciable increase in the level of the river had

E)Using water would continue being restricted because not any appreciable increase in the level of the river

“appreciative” means “showing gratitude”
"appreciable" means "substantial or significant "

so showers took place first then water level increased and then govt officials announced the restrictions
(past perfect) (past perfect) (simple past)
_________________

1) Kaplanprep 450 Q27 V21
2) Manhattan 530 Q35 V28
3) GmatPrep 450 Q33, V19
4) Veritas 460 Q31, V23
5) Veritas 440 Q 30, V21
6) Veritas 500 Q34, V 25
7) Gmat 420 Q27, V23
8) Veritas 520 Q36, V26 2/2
9) Veritas 540 Q37, V28 4/19
10)Manhattan 560 Q40, V28 4/28

Current Student
Joined: 18 Sep 2015
Posts: 107
GMAT 1: 610 Q43 V31
GMAT 2: 610 Q47 V27
GMAT 3: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 4: 700 Q49 V35
WE: Project Management (Health Care)
Re: Government officials announced that restrictions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2016, 05:59
1
KUDOS
JarvisR wrote:
Government officials announced that restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciative increase in the level of the river resulted from the intermittent showers that had fallen throughout the area the day before .

A)restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciative increase in the level of the river

B)restricting the use of water would continue because there had not been any appreciative increase in the river's level that

C)the use of water would continue to be restricted because not any appreciable increase in the river's level had

D)restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciable increase in the level of the river had

E)Using water would continue being restricted because not any appreciable increase in the level of the river

So we have 3 main events to sequence here:
1. Officials announced
2. Resulted
3. Fallen

"Announced" is part of an independent clause and "resulted" is its dependant clause. it makes sense to sequence those 2 events. from the context, if makes sense that "announced" happened after "resulted".

Now, since "fallen" is accompanied by "the day before", it is clear that the 2 events in the past did not occur at the same time, and that fallen is the oldest event out of the three.

=> D is correct
Manager
Joined: 17 Feb 2014
Posts: 112
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
GMAT 2: 740 Q48 V42
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Re: Government officials announced that restrictions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2017, 09:45
5
KUDOS
Government officials announced that restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciative increase in the level of the river resulted from the intermittent showers that had fallen throughout the area the day before .

Issue: Verb Form | Construction

Analysis:
1. "appreciative" - showing gratitude VS "appreciable" - noticeable - Slight difference in word but huge difference in meaning. And "increase" can not be appreciative.
2. "Restriction" should be the main subject to convey the meaning succinctly.

A) restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciative increase in the level of the river
- "appreciative" is incorrect
- Also missing "had" at the end, distorting the temporal relationship between "increase in level" and "intermittent rain"

B) restricting the use of water would continue because there had not been any appreciative increase in the river's level that
- "appreciative" is incorrect
- "that" seems incorrect modifier

C) the use of water would continue to be restricted because not any appreciable increase in the river's level had
- use of "the use of water" leads to unnecessary passive voice
- "not any.." is unidiomatic and can be replaced by simple "no.."

D) restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciable increase in the level of the river had

E) Using water would continue being restricted because not any appreciable increase in the level of the river
- "not any.." is unidiomatic and can be replaced by simple "no.."
- Also missing "had" at the end, distorting the temporal relationship between "increase in level" and "intermittent rain"

Intern
Joined: 20 Apr 2015
Posts: 27
GPA: 3.9
Re: Government officials announced that restrictions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2017, 03:42
Had is required here for connecting two related events in past perfect tense. so , that gives us with only 2 options.
Director
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Posts: 777
Re: Government officials announced that restrictions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2017, 23:58
Got confused with the use of 'had+past participle' two times.
In what cases can this structure be used?

I know one thing that when words such as 'before' and 'after' are used in a sentence, past perfect tense for the earlier event becomes optional. In this sentence there are 3 RELATED events:
(1) Intermittent showers that had fallen the day before
(2) No appreciable increase in the level of the river
(3) Restrictions on the use of water would continue

(The event 'government officials announced' is not a related event therefore did not mention it in the list above)

If there are more than two related events, can the past perfect be used two times (like in this one) or it depends on other factors?

Will this construction make sense?
Government officials announced that restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciable increase in the level of the river resulted from the intermittent showers that had fallen throughout the area the day before .

_________________

Help me make my explanation better by providing a logical feedback.

If you liked the post, HIT KUDOS !!

Don't quit.............Do it.

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 385
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V36
GPA: 3.56
Re: Government officials announced that restrictions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 May 2017, 18:44
Government officials announced that restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciative increase in the level of the river resulted from the intermittent showers that had fallen throughout the area the day before .

A) restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciative increase in the level of the river
--> we should use past perfect tense, not simple past tense.

B) restricting the use of water would continue because there had not been any appreciative increase in the river's level that

C) the use of water would continue to be restricted because not any appreciable increase in the river's level had

D) restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciable increase in the level of the river had
--> correct.

E) Using water would continue being restricted because not any appreciable increase in the level of the river
_________________

Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one - Bruce Lee

Manager
Joined: 20 Jun 2017
Posts: 78
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
Re: Government officials announced that restrictions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2017, 02:22
(A) restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciative increase in the level of the river - Incorrect as appreciable should be used which means substantial and not appreciative which means showing gratitude

(B) restricting the use of water would continue because there had not been any appreciative increase in the river's level that -
same as A
(C) the use of water would continue to be restricted because not any appreciable increase in the river's level had - passive not preferred

(D) restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciable increase in the level of the river had - correct

(E) Using water would continue being restricted because not any appreciable increase in the level of the river -avoid using being
Manager
Joined: 22 Aug 2016
Posts: 91
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Other (Education)
Re: Government officials announced that restrictions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2017, 21:47
1
KUDOS
Shiv2016 wrote:
Got confused with the use of 'had+past participle' two times.
In what cases can this structure be used?

I know one thing that when words such as 'before' and 'after' are used in a sentence, past perfect tense for the earlier event becomes optional. In this sentence there are 3 RELATED events:
(1) Intermittent showers that had fallen the day before
(2) No appreciable increase in the level of the river
(3) Restrictions on the use of water would continue

(The event 'government officials announced' is not a related event therefore did not mention it in the list above)

If there are more than two related events, can the past perfect be used two times (like in this one) or it depends on other factors?

Will this construction make sense?
Government officials announced that restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciable increase in the level of the river resulted from the intermittent showers that had fallen throughout the area the day before .

I'm not an expert but I'll try to explain.
The 3 verbs here are announced, resulted, and fallen.
The main verb is announced and we need to make it clear that the water not rising happened before announcing, we need a past perfect usage. Had resulted

Now there are 2 past perfect usages. Had resulted and had fallen. Between these 2, with the usage the day before, it is clear that the first incident is the shower falling.
Thus the whole sequencing issues are sorted.
Status: It's now or never
Joined: 10 Feb 2017
Posts: 287
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q40 V39
GPA: 3
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Government officials announced that restrictions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2017, 21:29
1
KUDOS
D is Correct - The sentence is direct and efficient, and the past-perfect verb had resulted appropriately expresses the sequence of events.
_________________

Class of 2019: Mannheim Business School
Class 0f 2020: HHL Leipzig

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 385
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V36
GPA: 3.56
Re: Government officials announced that restrictions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2017, 02:49
Government officials announced that restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciative increase in the level of the river resulted from the intermittent showers that had fallen throughout the area the day before .

(A) restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciative increase in the level of the river
--> "resulted" (simple past tense) is not appropriate because this action takes place at the same time as had fallen (past perfect).

(B) restricting the use of water would continue because there had not been any appreciative increase in the river's level that

(C) the use of water would continue to be restricted because not any appreciable increase in the river's level had

(D) restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciable increase in the level of the river had

(E) Using water would continue being restricted because not any appreciable increase in the level of the river
--> awkward.
_________________

Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one - Bruce Lee

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 385
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V36
GPA: 3.56
Re: Government officials announced that restrictions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2017, 02:52
dinesh86 wrote:
Government officials announced that restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciative increase in the level of the river resulted from the intermittent showers that had fallen throughout the area the day before .

D)restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciable increase in the level of the river had

I am not convinced with D. How Can there be two Past perfect in a single sentence ?

Shouldn't there be simple past 'Resulted' instead of 'Had resulted' as Increase in level obviously would occur after showers had fallen ?

There can be two Past Perfect in a single sentence provided that they convey the intended time sequencing and meaning correctly.

My advice: understand the intended meaning FIRST, grammar is SECOND.
_________________

Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one - Bruce Lee

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 385
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V36
GPA: 3.56
Government officials announced that restrictions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2017, 03:04
I would like to ask if, in sentence B, that can jump over the preceding prepositional phrase in river's level to modify not any appreciative level ?

_________________

Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one - Bruce Lee

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4316
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Government officials announced that restrictions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2017, 11:40
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
Top Contributor
Yes. Even now that is only referring to the increase only and not river's level, because falling rains do not cause river's level but cause an increase in the level.
_________________

Can you solve at least some SC questions without delving into the initial statement?

Narendran 98845 44509

e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2458
Re: Government officials announced that restrictions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2017, 14:25
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Shiv2016 wrote:
Got confused with the use of 'had+past participle' two times.
In what cases can this structure be used?

I know one thing that when words such as 'before' and 'after' are used in a sentence, past perfect tense for the earlier event becomes optional. In this sentence there are 3 RELATED events:
(1) Intermittent showers that had fallen the day before
(2) No appreciable increase in the level of the river
(3) Restrictions on the use of water would continue

(The event 'government officials announced' is not a related event therefore did not mention it in the list above)

If there are more than two related events, can the past perfect be used two times (like in this one) or it depends on other factors?

Will this construction make sense?
Government officials announced that restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciable increase in the level of the river resulted from the intermittent showers that had fallen throughout the area the day before .

Hello Shiv2016,

I am not sure of your doubt still persists but still, here is my explanation.

Yes, generally we see use of past perfect tense verb only once in an official sentence. But if there are more that two related events in a sentence, then we can certainly use two past perfect tense verbs to express the sequencing clearly.

There are three past events mentioned in the sentence:

1. announced
2. resulted

From the context of the sentence, it is clear that the announcement took place only after the level of the river did not rise as desired. This is the reason why the announcement was made.

Hence, to establish proper sequencing between these two related events, we use past perfect tense for the event that took place earlier - had resulted.

Now, the intermittent showers fell the day before. Because the showers were intermittent, the level of the river did not increase as desired. So these two events are also related.

But because the showers fell before no significant rise in the level of the river, this action has also been written in past perfect tense verb.

So now, we have two events written in past perfect tense. To make the sequencing clear between these two past events, the phrase the day before has been used. This phrase makes the sequencing of all the related events absolutely clear.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 1943
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Government officials announced that restrictions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2017, 22:11
Government officials announced that restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciative increase in the level of the river resulted from the intermittent showers that had fallen throughout the area the day before .

(A) restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciative increase in the level of the river - Verb tense issue - Use of simple past tense verb resulted leads to illogical meaning as we need to establish proper sequencing to denote action denoted by resulted took place before the Government announced; usage of appreciative is incorrect

(B) restricting the use of water would continue because there had not been any appreciative increase in the river's level that - same verb tense issue

(C) the use of water would continue to be restricted because not any appreciable increase in the river's level had - the usage of not any appreciable is awkward

(D) restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciable increase in the level of the river had - Correct

(E) Using water would continue being restricted because not any appreciable increase in the level of the river - same verb tense issue ; usage of being

_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Re: Government officials announced that restrictions   [#permalink] 24 Aug 2017, 22:11

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by