GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 23 Jul 2018, 08:41

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Governments have only one response to public criticism of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4667
Re: Governments have only one response to public criticism of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Oct 2017, 11:30
1
gmatcracker2017 wrote:
hi mikemcgarry

wonderful was your explanation to discard E. Thank you! :-)

many a time, however, I have seen such logical fallacy in place to strengthen an argument. Specifically - although not pertaining to this question - is the usage of such fallacy a legitimate way of strengthening any argument ...?

thanks in advance, man 8-)

Dear gmatcracker2017,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

Can one advance a logical fallacy as a legitimate way to strengthen an argument? On the GMAT CR, absolutely not. The GMAT is a magical world in which everything is perfectly logical, so a logical fallacy would carry no weight at all. ON the GMAT CR, nothing good can come from a logical fallacy.

That's on the GMAT. In politics and in the business world, you will at times run into people, especially people in power, who simply want to believe whatever they believe, and if an argument for what they believe needs strengthening, a logical fallacy is just as good as anything else to support it. It's sad, but the real world falls astoundingly short of the high standard of logic and intellectual rigor found on the GMAT.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Status: love the club...
Joined: 24 Mar 2015
Posts: 278
Governments have only one response to public criticism of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Oct 2017, 08:19
mikemcgarry wrote:
gmatcracker2017 wrote:
hi mikemcgarry

wonderful was your explanation to discard E. Thank you! :-)

many a time, however, I have seen such logical fallacy in place to strengthen an argument. Specifically - although not pertaining to this question - is the usage of such fallacy a legitimate way of strengthening any argument ...?

thanks in advance, man 8-)

Dear gmatcracker2017,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

Can one advance a logical fallacy as a legitimate way to strengthen an argument? On the GMAT CR, absolutely not. The GMAT is a magical world in which everything is perfectly logical, so a logical fallacy would carry no weight at all. ON the GMAT CR, nothing good can come from a logical fallacy.

That's on the GMAT. In politics and in the business world, you will at times run into people, especially people in power, who simply want to believe whatever they believe, and if an argument for what they believe needs strengthening, a logical fallacy is just as good as anything else to support it. It's sad, but the real world falls astoundingly short of the high standard of logic and intellectual rigor found on the GMAT.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)


thanks man :-)
great!

you have provided, I must say, an excellent explanation to the issue
it was really my privilege to put the issue under your scrutiny

thanks again
take care :-)
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2091
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Governments have only one response to public criticism of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Dec 2017, 05:26
gurpreet07 wrote:
Governments have only one response to public criticism of socially necessary services: regulation of the activity of providing those services. But governments inevitably make the activity more expensive by regulating it, and that is particularly troublesome in these times of strained financial resources. However, since public criticism of child-care services has undermined all confidence in such services, and since such services are socially necessary, the government is certain to respond.

Which one of the following statements can be inferred from the passage?

(A) The quality of child care will improve.
(B) The cost of providing child-care services will increase.
(C) The government will use funding to foster advances in child care.
(D) If public criticism of policy is strongly voiced, the government is certain to respond.
(E) If child-care services are not regulated, the cost of providing child care will not increase.

Source : LSAT PrepTest 2 - October 1991 Q9


Public criticism of service --> regulation --> increased cost

Child care is publicly criticized --> there will be regulation

OKAY. So we can feel pretty confident that the correct answer is going to say something about cost.

(A) This is actually a pretty tricky answer, because the whole point of regulation is to improve the service. But we can't definitively say it'll happen.

(B) CORRECT. Yep. We know regulation leads to increased cost, and we know there will be regulation.

(C)Irrelevant

(D) We only can infer this for socially necessary services

(E) This is what we call "reversed logic". Remember if A-->B, that doesn't mean -A-->-B (the correct contrapositive would be -B-->-A, the meaning of which would be "If the cost of a service hasn't gone up, it hasn't been subjected to regulation." ).
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Governments have only one response to public criticism of &nbs [#permalink] 13 Dec 2017, 05:26

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 23 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Governments have only one response to public criticism of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.