GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 16 Oct 2018, 05:32

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Governor Dupont is an outspoken critic

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 06 Mar 2014
Posts: 247
Location: India
GMAT Date: 04-30-2015
Reviews Badge
Governor Dupont is an outspoken critic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2014, 01:08
1
4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

32% (01:37) correct 68% (01:49) wrong based on 335 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Governor Dupont is an outspoken critic of agricultural I I,
subsidies for farmers in his state. However, a local paper
recently published documents proving that Dupont
received $500,000 in federal money to buy equipment for
use in his apple orchards. Therefore, Dupont should be
forced to return the money or should resign from office.

If true, which of the following statements would reveal
the most serious flaw in this argument?

A. There is no precedent for the resignation of a
governor from office in the state ..
B. The governor's hypocrisy is not punishable by law.
C. Since its publication of the article, the newspaper has
lost the documents showing Dupont's receipt of money
from the government.
D. Dupont accepted the $500,000 before beginning his
term as governor.
E. Farmers in the state have raised the prices charged
for crops by more than 50 percent, while their operating
costs have remained the same.
Most Helpful Expert Reply
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
P
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8385
Location: Pune, India
Re: Governor Dupont is an outspoken critic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Aug 2014, 21:46
5
earnit wrote:
Governor Dupont is an outspoken critic of agricultural I I,
subsidies for farmers in his state. However, a local paper
recently published documents proving that Dupont
received $500,000 in federal money to buy equipment for
use in his apple orchards. Therefore, Dupont should be
forced to return the money or should resign from office.

If true, which of the following statements would reveal
the most serious flaw in this argument?

A. There is no precedent for the resignation of a
governor from office in the state ..
B. The governor's hypocrisy is not punishable by law.
C. Since its publication of the article, the newspaper has
lost the documents showing Dupont's receipt of money
from the government.
D. Dupont accepted the $500,000 before beginning his
term as governor.
E. Farmers in the state have raised the prices charged
for crops by more than 50 percent, while their operating
costs have remained the same.


Responding to a pm:

I do not approve of the question. The argument is not asking for legal action. It is only asking for moral action - "return money" or "quit". If someone robs a bank - which is illegal - returning money does not absolve him of the guilt. The debate is of ethics - he may be certainly within legal rights to obtain subsidies even if he is a critic of the system. It is hypocrisy, not a crime. I wouldn't pick (B) because it is not a question of law at all. The argument is looking at the ethical angle, not legal angle.

If I had to choose from the given options, I might actually pick (D) since it is a question of ethics. He had accepted subsidy before becoming the Governor and after becoming the Governor he understood the effect of subsidies on the society and hence became a critic - we could give some logic to his actions and hence not denounce him.

Not a good question.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >

GMAT self-study has never been more personalized or more fun. Try ORION Free!

General Discussion
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2014
Posts: 10
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V42
GMAT 2: 760 Q49 V42
Re: Governor Dupont is an outspoken critic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2014, 22:54
A) Does not weaken the "return the money" argument.
B) Possible, option says there is no legal basis for the argument.
C) Stem says newspaper has "proved". So loss of originals is immaterial.
D) Irrelevant.
E) Actually supports Dupont's opinion.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 467
Concentration: Technology, Other
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Governor Dupont is an outspoken critic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2014, 23:34
Governor Dupont is an outspoken critic of agricultural I I, subsidies for farmers in his state.
However, a local paper recently published documents proving that Dupont received $500,000 in federal money to buy equipment for use in his apple orchards.

Conclusion:
Therefore, Dupont should be forced to return the money or should resign from office.
Assumption:
There are laws pertaining to the mentioned scenario.
If there are no laws then authors points doesn't hold and hence D need not to obliged to comply with what author says.

If true, which of the following statements would reveal the most serious flaw in this argument?

A. There is no precedent for the resignation of a governor from office in the state .. [doesnt maters whether there are any precedent or not]
B. The governor's hypocrisy is not punishable by law. [Yes.]
C. Since its publication of the article, the newspaper has lost the documents showing Dupont's receipt of money from the government. [They may get a duplicate of it]
D. Dupont accepted the $500,000 before beginning his term as governor.[Tempting but B is better than D because everything comes down to law. Not to a personal view.]
E. Farmers in the state have raised the prices charged for crops by more than 50 percent, while their operating costs have remained the same.[Irrelevant]
Retired Moderator
avatar
B
Status: On a mountain of skulls, in the castle of pain, I sit on a throne of blood.
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Posts: 335
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Governor Dupont is an outspoken critic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Aug 2014, 05:24
Can I know the source of this question?

I think B strengthens the argument rather than finding a flaw in it. If hypocrisy is not punishable by law then the only option left is taking moral responsibility and returning the money and stepping down - which is exactly what the argument proposes. In a flaw question we have to find a premise or an assumption and invalidate it so that the entire conclusion falls apart.

What am I overlooking here? Can some expert help?
Retired Moderator
avatar
B
Status: On a mountain of skulls, in the castle of pain, I sit on a throne of blood.
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Posts: 335
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Governor Dupont is an outspoken critic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Aug 2014, 08:58
Thanks Karishma for the help.

But don't you think that a change of heart after being elected a governor is too big an assumption for D to be the correct choice?
Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3305
Re: Governor Dupont is an outspoken critic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Aug 2014, 10:07
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
P
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8385
Location: Pune, India
Re: Governor Dupont is an outspoken critic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Aug 2014, 20:57
2
AmoyV wrote:
Thanks Karishma for the help.

But don't you think that a change of heart after being elected a governor is too big an assumption for D to be the correct choice?



As I said in my post before - if I HAD TO choose, I would choose (D) by stretching my imagination. The point I was making was that in any case, I would not choose (B). Also, since the question is not up to the mark, there is no point dwelling on it. I would suggest you to move on.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >

GMAT self-study has never been more personalized or more fun. Try ORION Free!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2013
Posts: 111
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Governor Dupont is an outspoken critic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Aug 2014, 14:14
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
AmoyV wrote:
Thanks Karishma for the help.

But don't you think that a change of heart after being elected a governor is too big an assumption for D to be the correct choice?



As I said in my post before - if I HAD TO choose, I would choose (D) by stretching my imagination. The point I was making was that in any case, I would not choose (B). Also, since the question is not up to the mark, there is no point dwelling on it. I would suggest you to move on.


Agreed! D for me as well. No way would I chose B
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 06 Aug 2013
Posts: 76
Re: Governor Dupont is an outspoken critic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2014, 01:28
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
earnit wrote:
Governor Dupont is an outspoken critic of agricultural I I,
subsidies for farmers in his state. However, a local paper
recently published documents proving that Dupont
received $500,000 in federal money to buy equipment for
use in his apple orchards. Therefore, Dupont should be
forced to return the money or should resign from office.

If true, which of the following statements would reveal
the most serious flaw in this argument?

A. There is no precedent for the resignation of a
governor from office in the state ..
B. The governor's hypocrisy is not punishable by law.
C. Since its publication of the article, the newspaper has
lost the documents showing Dupont's receipt of money
from the government.
D. Dupont accepted the $500,000 before beginning his
term as governor.
E. Farmers in the state have raised the prices charged
for crops by more than 50 percent, while their operating
costs have remained the same.


Responding to a pm:

I do not approve of the question. The argument is not asking for legal action. It is only asking for moral action - "return money" or "quit". If someone robs a bank - which is illegal - returning money does not absolve him of the guilt. The debate is of ethics - he may be certainly within legal rights to obtain subsidies even if he is a critic of the system. It is hypocrisy, not a crime. I wouldn't pick (B) because it is not a question of law at all. The argument is looking at the ethical angle, not legal angle.

If I had to choose from the given options, I might actually pick (D) since it is a question of ethics. He had accepted subsidy before becoming the Governor and after becoming the Governor he understood the effect of subsidies on the society and hence became a critic - we could give some logic to his actions and hence not denounce him.

Not a good question.



i completely agree with you on this. I narrowed down to A, B and D, but then B talks about a fact if a crime is punishable by law. Nowhere in the argument is it stated that taking FEDERAL money is a crime. Most importantly, its more about an ethical ground than a criminal ground. I would go with D too, i don't approve the standard of the question though.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Status: Researching
Affiliations: NA
Joined: 03 Oct 2014
Posts: 28
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Nonprofit, General Management
GMAT 1: 460 Q14 V36
GMAT 2: 540 Q31 V34
GMAT 3: 610 Q36 V38
GMAT 4: 570 Q29 V40
GPA: 3.11
WE: Account Management (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: Governor Dupont is an outspoken critic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2017, 12:14
This question is a bit absurd in its answer choices. I haven't run across any CR answer choices that are as pointed in their conclusion as this one, and be right. Usually the answer choices with incredibly pointed language are the choices that are wrong. Bit thrown off by this one in not just the conclusion in the question stem. Also, I think I was expecting more of "the argument assumes" setup.
_________________

Aut viam inveniam aut faciam.

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 28 Mar 2018
Posts: 46
Re: Governor Dupont is an outspoken critic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Apr 2018, 07:18
This is a poor question for all of the reasons others have already listed. Nothing in the prompt talks about the governor being punished by law , the question is moral and not legal. I also picked D as the best of bad answers
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Governor Dupont is an outspoken critic &nbs [#permalink] 16 Apr 2018, 07:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Governor Dupont is an outspoken critic

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.