GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 16 Oct 2018, 09:36

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Governor Kipling, in responding to reports that many of his constituen

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 08 Sep 2017
Posts: 71
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Governor Kipling, in responding to reports that many of his constituen  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jul 2018, 18:15
12
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

32% (01:42) correct 68% (01:28) wrong based on 342 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Governor Kipling, in responding to reports that many of his constituents were calling for his ouster, told reporters: "My critics charge me with drastically exacerbating our state's unemployment problems. By raising corporate taxes, they claim, I single-handedly forced many labor-intensive industries to move out of the state. What they fail to realize, however, is that my purpose in increasing the corporate income tax was to raise revenues to fund a statewide jobs program. The remarks I made two years ago before the legislature would bear me out if my detractors could hold their tongues long enough to read the Official Journal. But they prefer to persecute me for wanting to create jobs and ease our state's economic woes."

Which of the following, if true, would be the best counter to the Governor's argument?

A) There is no guarantee that a statewide jobs program would be effective in reducing unemployment.
B) The number of jobs created by a statewide jobs program would not offset the number of jobs lost as a result of the tax hike.
C) The Governor's constituents want to oust him because of the effects, not the intent, of the tax hike.
D) The Governor's claim about the intent of his tax hike is impossible to verify.
E) Raising taxes is not an effective way of creating jobs in industry.

_________________

Kudos please if you liked my post


Thanks!

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 05 Jun 2018
Posts: 26
GMAT 1: 560 Q49 V18
Re: Governor Kipling, in responding to reports that many of his constituen  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jul 2018, 08:14
I took B. I have no idea of why its wrong and how C is correct. OE please
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 31 Jan 2012
Posts: 70
Re: Governor Kipling, in responding to reports that many of his constituen  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jul 2018, 12:06
1
Okay the only reason I can see why the answer is C is because C bypasses all arguments; therefore it's the best. The fact is he rationalizing unemployment rate currently, we kinda assuming it has gotten worst. Doesn't matter what he was trying to do, they want to oust him cause it caused unemployment.

B is a solid choice and I made the same mistake, but at least the mayor has a valid argument that he did create jobs. You can't come back from C.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 08 Sep 2017
Posts: 71
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Governor Kipling, in responding to reports that many of his constituen  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jul 2018, 19:13
Can someone please explain this tricky question? Is this a CR question accurate to the real test? Kaplan explanation is not very good...
_________________

Kudos please if you liked my post


Thanks!

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 27 Aug 2016
Posts: 15
Re: Governor Kipling, in responding to reports that many of his constituen  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2018, 01:54
mikemcgarry, GMATNinja : Could you please help with this one. I am not clear as to how Choice C is correct answer.
Thanks
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 17 Jul 2017
Posts: 6
Location: Nigeria
Schools: Insead Sept'18
GMAT 1: 680 Q44 V39
GPA: 2.92
CAT Tests
Re: Governor Kipling, in responding to reports that many of his constituen  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Sep 2018, 02:04
dimmak wrote:
Governor Kipling, in responding to reports that many of his constituents were calling for his ouster, told reporters: "My critics charge me with drastically exacerbating our state's unemployment problems. By raising corporate taxes, they claim, I single-handedly forced many labor-intensive industries to move out of the state. What they fail to realize, however, is that my purpose in increasing the corporate income tax was to raise revenues to fund a statewide jobs program. The remarks I made two years ago before the legislature would bear me out if my detractors could hold their tongues long enough to read the Official Journal. But they prefer to persecute me for wanting to create jobs and ease our state's economic woes."

Which of the following, if true, would be the best counter to the Governor's argument?

A) There is no guarantee that a statewide jobs program would be effective in reducing unemployment.
B) The number of jobs created by a statewide jobs program would not offset the number of jobs lost as a result of the tax hike.
C) The Governor's constituents want to oust him because of the effects, not the intent, of the tax hike.
D) The Governor's claim about the intent of his tax hike is impossible to verify.
E) Raising taxes is not an effective way of creating jobs in industry.



I chose B as well but I see how C is better, the constituents don't care about his intentions anymore; they're more particular about the effects at this point.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 15 Apr 2017
Posts: 13
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Entrepreneurship
Schools: XLRI"20
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.53
Re: Governor Kipling, in responding to reports that many of his constituen  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Sep 2018, 02:21
A: The argument is not referring to unemployment.
B: Too strong. Premise does not discuss the number of jobs lost and or gained.
C: Correct. Governor replies by stating his intent for the tax hike, but constituents are referring to the outcome of his proposal.
D: Could be true, but C is better.
E: Out of Scope.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Sep 2014
Posts: 67
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Governor Kipling, in responding to reports that many of his constituen  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Sep 2018, 07:41
1
But they prefer to persecute me for wanting to create jobs and ease our state's economic woes."

C) The Governor's constituents want to oust him because of the effects, not the intent, of the tax hike.

“ coz of effects, not the intent”
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 530
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
CAT Tests
Re: Governor Kipling, in responding to reports that many of his constituen  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2018, 08:06
dimmak wrote:
Can someone please explain this tricky question? Is this a CR question accurate to the real test? Kaplan explanation is not very good...


From the premise: ""My critics charge me with drastically exacerbating our state's unemployment problems."
If unemployment now is 50% then the Governor is charged with increasing this %

Consider B : "The number of jobs created by a statewide jobs program would not offset the number of jobs lost as a result of the tax hike."

If the # of jobs lost makes the unemployment ratio to rise to 80% and the # of jobs created balances it to, say, 56%, then there is no drastic exacerbation of unemployment problems. So the premise doesn't hold true here. This is how B is not correct.
Moreover, the conclusion is - " But they prefer to persecute me for wanting to create jobs and ease our state's economic woes."

The governor is raising question on the preferences of the Governor's constituents. So the weakening statement must address to this aspect of preference. C does that aptly.
_________________

------------------------------
"Trust the timing of your life"
Hit Kudus if this has helped you get closer to your goal, and also to assist others save time. Tq :)

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Governor Kipling, in responding to reports that many of his constituen &nbs [#permalink] 13 Sep 2018, 08:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Governor Kipling, in responding to reports that many of his constituen

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.