It is currently 23 Sep 2017, 09:41

Happening Now:

Alleviate MBA app anxiety! Come to Chat Room #2


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Governor: The bridge that spans the Brookline and Kings boro

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2012
Posts: 73

Kudos [?]: 124 [0], given: 52

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Premium Member
Governor: The bridge that spans the Brookline and Kings boro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jul 2014, 04:22
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

68% (00:43) correct 32% (00:48) wrong based on 518 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Governor: The bridge that spans the Brookline and Kings boroughs is in desperate need of repair with estimates in the range of $30 million. Over one million vehicles cross the bridge each day. Therefore, if the city charges a mere $1 dollar toll for crossing the bridge, we will be able to raise enough funds to make repairs to the bridge within a month.

Which of the following is an assumption upon which the governor's argument depends?

(A) The bridge, if not repaired, will likely collapse, causing the deaths of many people.
(B) The toll will not cause a significant hardship on the commuters that use the bridge.
(C) The toll will not induce some commuters to use mass transit when traveling between the two boroughs.
(D) After the repairs to the bridge are complete, it is estimated that the bridge will be able to handle 20% more traffic.
(E)Most of the residents in Brookline and Kings use the bridge to commute to work each day.


[Reveal] Spoiler:
Why B is not the correct answer?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by carcass on 07 Jul 2014, 04:55, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the title of the question

Kudos [?]: 124 [0], given: 52

2 KUDOS received
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
G
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3350

Kudos [?]: 8764 [2], given: 1139

Governor: The bridge that spans the Brookline and Kings boro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jul 2014, 05:08
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Although is a question from veritas prep I think is not an excellent question. Between C and E both could be a possible answer

Conclusion says ;: Therefore, if the city charges a mere $1 dollar toll for crossing the bridge, we will be able to raise enough funds to make repairs to the bridge within a month.

Now we have the key words the city charges a mere $1 dollar toll for crossing the bridge so the assumption is : IF the commuters pass through the bridge we raise money because the have to pay.

But either in C and E we do have : in C some (i.e up to 99% of the commuters) and in E we do have most (i.e up to 99% ) though we do not know excatly the proportion of this group.

Alike E and C could be insert in the same scenario. It also true that C is stronger than E because E talks about commuters to work and C in a more general way with commuters pass through the bridge. But I think the argument is bias in somehow, not so clear at a closer look.



Back to your question : B is wrong because hardship is not an attinent argument for out conclusion.

Hope this helps
_________________

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS AND RESOURCES
Quant: 1. ALL GMATPrep questions Quant/Verbal 2. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 3. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 4. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version 5. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Quant Videos
Verbal:1. Verbal question bank and directories by Carcass 2. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Verbal Videos 3. Critical Reasoning_Oldy but goldy question banks 4. Sentence Correction_Oldy but goldy question banks 5. Reading-comprehension_Oldy but goldy question banks

Kudos [?]: 8764 [2], given: 1139

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: PLAY HARD OR GO HOME
Joined: 25 Feb 2014
Posts: 180

Kudos [?]: 176 [1], given: 623

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Mannheim
GMAT 1: 560 Q46 V22
GPA: 3.1
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Governor: The bridge that spans the Brookline and Kings boro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2014, 00:30
1
This post received
KUDOS
carcass wrote:
Although is a question from veritas prep I think is not an excellent question. Between C and E both could be a possible answer

Conclusion says ;: Therefore, if the city charges a mere $1 dollar toll for crossing the bridge, we will be able to raise enough funds to make repairs to the bridge within a month.

Now we have the key words the city charges a mere $1 dollar toll for crossing the bridge so the assumption is : IF the commuters pass through the bridge we raise money because the have to pay.

But either in C and E we do have : in C some (i.e up to 99% of the commuters) and in E we do have most (i.e up to 99% ) though we do not know excatly the proportion of this group.

Alike E and C could be insert in the same scenario. It also true that C is stronger than E because E talks about commuters to work and C in a more general way with commuters pass through the bridge. But I think the argument is bias in somehow, not so clear at a closer look.



Back to your question : B is wrong because hardship is not an attinent argument for out conclusion.

Hope this helps


Hello,

i am having problems in eliminating ans.option B.

If we negate it,

the commuters will face significant hardhips in using the bridge..

bcz of tht they wont use the bridge and revenue wont b generated as per the conclusion..


please help me out with it.. :|
_________________

ITS NOT OVER , UNTIL I WIN ! I CAN, AND I WILL .PERIOD.

Kudos [?]: 176 [1], given: 623

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2012
Posts: 73

Kudos [?]: 124 [0], given: 52

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Premium Member
Governor: The bridge that spans the Brookline and Kings boro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2014, 01:03
vards wrote:

Hello,

i am having problems in eliminating ans.option B.

If we negate it,

the commuters will face significant hardhips in using the bridge..

bcz of tht they wont use the bridge and revenue wont b generated as per the conclusion..


please help me out with it.. :|


Actually Governor is assuming that over one million vehicles are using the bridge so if he collects $1 from each of them then he would have enough funds to repair bridge.

If you negate C, it would be :

The toll will not induce some commuters to use mass transit when traveling between the two boroughs.

So if enough number of vehicles will not use the bridge then he would not be able to collect enough fund for bridge repair.

Governor is not considering the economical condition of commuters.
Raising fund might be the hardship on the commuters but he is not considering it.

Below is the explanation from Veritas. It says B strengthens the argument.

Correct Answer: C
The argument claims that by charging a $1 toll, the city will raise the required $30 million in a month to cover the cost of repairs. Using the Assumption Negation Technique (ANT), we will find that by negating answer choice C (the toll WILL induce some commuters to use mass transit) the argument is no longer valid. C, if negated, would mean that commuters who would otherwise pay the toll will use mass transit and, therefore, not contribute to the toll revenues, causing the city to fall short of the governor's prediction. Answer A is irrelevant. While tragic, the collapse of the bridge need not be assumed for the argument to be valid. While answer choice B strengthens the governor's argument, it is not an assumption that the argument is dependent upon. In answer choice D, the subsequent capacity of the bridge is irrelevant as to whether the toll will be able to raise enough money. While choice E helps the governor's case, it is not necessarily a required assumption of the argument. We do not care why the residents use the bridge, but whether they will use it at all after the toll is implemented.

Last edited by chetan86 on 08 Jul 2014, 05:06, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 124 [0], given: 52

Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
G
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3350

Kudos [?]: 8764 [0], given: 1139

Governor: The bridge that spans the Brookline and Kings boro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2014, 04:52
vards wrote:
carcass wrote:
Although is a question from veritas prep I think is not an excellent question. Between C and E both could be a possible answer

Conclusion says ;: Therefore, if the city charges a mere $1 dollar toll for crossing the bridge, we will be able to raise enough funds to make repairs to the bridge within a month.

Now we have the key words the city charges a mere $1 dollar toll for crossing the bridge so the assumption is : IF the commuters pass through the bridge we raise money because the have to pay.

But either in C and E we do have : in C some (i.e up to 99% of the commuters) and in E we do have most (i.e up to 99% ) though we do not know excatly the proportion of this group.

Alike E and C could be insert in the same scenario. It also true that C is stronger than E because E talks about commuters to work and C in a more general way with commuters pass through the bridge. But I think the argument is bias in somehow, not so clear at a closer look.



Back to your question : B is wrong because hardship is not an attinent argument for out conclusion.

Hope this helps


Hello,

i am having problems in eliminating ans.option B.

If we negate it,

the commuters will face significant hardhips in using the bridge..

bcz of tht they wont use the bridge and revenue wont b generated as per the conclusion..


please help me out with it.. :|


Hi,

but have or not hardship is not related to our conclusion. Assumption question MUST BE TRUE in order to have our conclusion.

Hardship VS money to rise ......is not related. at all and in anyway.

Hope this helps
_________________

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS AND RESOURCES
Quant: 1. ALL GMATPrep questions Quant/Verbal 2. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 3. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 4. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version 5. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Quant Videos
Verbal:1. Verbal question bank and directories by Carcass 2. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Verbal Videos 3. Critical Reasoning_Oldy but goldy question banks 4. Sentence Correction_Oldy but goldy question banks 5. Reading-comprehension_Oldy but goldy question banks

Kudos [?]: 8764 [0], given: 1139

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 219

Kudos [?]: 195 [0], given: 31

Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: CBS '17
GPA: 4
WE: General Management (Consumer Products)
Re: Governor: The bridge that spans the Brookline and Kings boro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2014, 07:57
carcass wrote:
Although is a question from veritas prep I think is not an excellent question. Between C and E both could be a possible answer

Conclusion says ;: Therefore, if the city charges a mere $1 dollar toll for crossing the bridge, we will be able to raise enough funds to make repairs to the bridge within a month.

Now we have the key words the city charges a mere $1 dollar toll for crossing the bridge so the assumption is : IF the commuters pass through the bridge we raise money because the have to pay.

But either in C and E we do have : in C some (i.e up to 99% of the commuters) and in E we do have most (i.e up to 99% ) though we do not know excatly the proportion of this group.

Alike E and C could be insert in the same scenario. It also true that C is stronger than E because E talks about commuters to work and C in a more general way with commuters pass through the bridge. But I think the argument is bias in somehow, not so clear at a closer look.



Back to your question : B is wrong because hardship is not an attinent argument for out conclusion.

Hope this helps


Can we reasonably define 90% or 99% of commuters as some commuters? I don't think so. Between C and E, though E has limited applicability only to commuters to work, it makes a stronger statement than does C.
E seems more appropriate.

Kudos [?]: 195 [0], given: 31

1 KUDOS received
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10174

Kudos [?]: 254 [1], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Governor: The bridge that spans the Brookline and Kings boro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jul 2016, 01:28
1
This post received
KUDOS
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 254 [1], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 29 Oct 2016
Posts: 269

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 906

Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24
GRE 1: 314 Q167 V147
Re: Governor: The bridge that spans the Brookline and Kings boro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2017, 06:36
chetan86 wrote:
Governor: The bridge that spans the Brookline and Kings boroughs is in desperate need of repair with estimates in the range of $30 million. Over one million vehicles cross the bridge each day. Therefore, if the city charges a mere $1 dollar toll for crossing the bridge, we will be able to raise enough funds to make repairs to the bridge within a month.

Which of the following is an assumption upon which the governor's argument depends?

(A) The bridge, if not repaired, will likely collapse, causing the deaths of many people.
(B) The toll will not cause a significant hardship on the commuters that use the bridge.
(C) The toll will not induce some commuters to use mass transit when traveling between the two boroughs.
(D) After the repairs to the bridge are complete, it is estimated that the bridge will be able to handle 20% more traffic.
(E)Most of the residents in Brookline and Kings use the bridge to commute to work each day.


[Reveal] Spoiler:
Why B is not the correct answer?

(A) The consequence if leave the bridge damaged is out of concern
(B) The commuters' condition is out of scope as long as they pay the toll
(C) Definitely yes!! If the toll deter the commuters to transit by public transport,the target fund might be impossible to reach
(D) Totally out of scope
(E) Whether the residents in Brookline and Kings use this bridge is not the concern.Majority of vehicles crossing this bridge could even from other towns

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 906

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 479

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 18

Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Governor: The bridge that spans the Brookline and Kings boro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jan 2017, 14:38
Governor: The bridge that spans the Brookline and Kings boroughs is in desperate need of repair with estimates in the range of $30 million. Over one million vehicles cross the bridge each day. Therefore, if the city charges a mere $1 dollar toll for crossing the bridge, we will be able to raise enough funds to make repairs to the bridge within a month.

Which of the following is an assumption upon which the governor's argument depends?

(A) The bridge, if not repaired, will likely collapse, causing the deaths of many people.
out of scope
(B) The toll will not cause a significant hardship on the commuters that use the bridge.
out of scope
(C) The toll will not induce some commuters to use mass transit when traveling between the two boroughs.
Most relevant option,also clears the possiblity of failure of the plan.
(D) After the repairs to the bridge are complete, it is estimated that the bridge will be able to handle 20% more traffic.
Out of scope
(E)Most of the residents in Brookline and Kings use the bridge to commute to work each day.
out of scope

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 18

Director
Director
avatar
G
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Posts: 766

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 259

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Governor: The bridge that spans the Brookline and Kings boro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jan 2017, 23:37
chetan86 wrote:
Governor: The bridge that spans the Brookline and Kings boroughs is in desperate need of repair with estimates in the range of $30 million. Over one million vehicles cross the bridge each day. Therefore, if the city charges a mere $1 dollar toll for crossing the bridge, we will be able to raise enough funds to make repairs to the bridge within a month.

Which of the following is an assumption upon which the governor's argument depends?

(A) The bridge, if not repaired, will likely collapse, causing the deaths of many people.
(B) The toll will not cause a significant hardship on the commuters that use the bridge.
(C) The toll will not induce some commuters to use mass transit when traveling between the two boroughs.
(D) After the repairs to the bridge are complete, it is estimated that the bridge will be able to handle 20% more traffic.
(E)Most of the residents in Brookline and Kings use the bridge to commute to work each day.


[Reveal] Spoiler:
Why B is not the correct answer?


Option C is the best choice here.
Negated statement: The toll will induce some (can be one or more) commuters to use the mass transit.....

If this is the case then the 1 Million vehicles that cross the bridge daily will be reduced by some number depending on the total number of people using mass transit. This will definitely reduce the success of the 30 day plan.

Whereas information stated in option E is already stated in the argument and thus is not an assumption (unstated premise).

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 259

Re: Governor: The bridge that spans the Brookline and Kings boro   [#permalink] 15 Jan 2017, 23:37
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 old bridge across Black River vjsharma25 14 03 Sep 2016, 00:36
1 Opposing governor candidate response.. avi1787 3 04 May 2017, 06:42
10 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Governor Dupont is an outspoken critic earnit 11 09 Aug 2017, 12:14
2 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Question - governor's subsidy BeckyRobinsonTPR 2 07 Jul 2013, 00:33
Candidate for governor: The outgoing governor and his alicegmat 3 28 Jan 2012, 10:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Governor: The bridge that spans the Brookline and Kings boro

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.