It is currently 18 Oct 2017, 23:00

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3454

Kudos [?]: 919 [1], given: 781

Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Sep 2003, 11:17
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

34% (01:29) correct 66% (01:29) wrong based on 71 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

20. Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent character traits by examining people's handwriting. For example, a strong cross on the "t" is supposed to denote enthusiasm. Obviously, however, with practice and perseverance people can alter their handwriting to include this feature. So it seems that graphologists must hold that permanent character traits can be changed.

The argument against graphology proceeds by

(A) citing apparently incontestable evidence that leads to absurd consequences when conjoined with the view in question

(B) demonstrating that an apparently controversial and interesting claim is really just a platitude

(C) arguing that a particular technique of analysis can never be effective when the people analyzed know that it is being used

(D) showing that proponents of the view have no theoretical justification for the view

(E) attacking a technique by arguing that what the technique is supposed to detect can be detected quite readily without it

Kudos [?]: 919 [1], given: 781

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jan 2003
Posts: 128

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Ukraine
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Sep 2003, 12:29
D is better indeed. Is it correct answer?

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3454

Kudos [?]: 919 [0], given: 781

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Sep 2003, 12:35
vaka wrote:
D is better indeed. Is it correct answer?


nope..D is incorrect

Argument does not ask for theoretical justification.

Kudos [?]: 919 [0], given: 781

CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3454

Kudos [?]: 919 [0], given: 781

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Sep 2003, 12:49
vaka wrote:
A?


yes, A is correct..can you try and explain please

Kudos [?]: 919 [0], given: 781

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jan 2003
Posts: 128

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Ukraine
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Sep 2003, 13:00
well, after the choices that had turned wrong I was struggling between A and B. But B just establishes the fact, whereas A gives more detailed description of method employed.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2003
Posts: 257

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Sep 2003, 21:11
The argument proceeds by an example where correlation is given between two things (style of writing - effect and tarits -cause). Opponents argue what if writing style is changed, will the permanent traits also change.
Now is it not an absurd conclusion that permanent traits will change. How can something that's permanent change..!! and he acheives this by giving evidence that cannot be contested.'
thanks

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jan 2010
Posts: 124

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 12

Re: CR : Graphologists [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Aug 2010, 12:52
good question ..its A indeed

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 12

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 956

Kudos [?]: 902 [0], given: 36

Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Chicago Booth - Class of 2015
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: CR : Graphologists [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Aug 2010, 22:37
B is wrong since there is no "claim" as such. Second we don't know if claim is "interesting" and "controversial". What we know for sure is that the evidence is tenable. A is correct.

Kudos [?]: 902 [0], given: 36

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 31 Jul 2010
Posts: 17

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: CR : Graphologists [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2010, 12:53
A it is.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2010
Posts: 40

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: CR : Graphologists [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2010, 17:01
I thought of B. :)
Looks like I am wrong.
_________________

"Not everyone who works hard succeeds. But all those who succeeded have worked hard!" ~~ Coach Kamogawa

Best,
ItsNotOver

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 105

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: CR : Graphologists [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2010, 14:18
A

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10118

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Aug 2016, 06:50
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 150

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 127

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2016, 09:23
C it is

C states that if people get to know what is being tested, they can introduce that character into their writing and hence it can not be a valid method to test.

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 127

Re: Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent   [#permalink] 29 Sep 2016, 09:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.