Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 01 Mar 2017, 12:48

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2005
Posts: 454
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2006, 00:19
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that inthose built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically
worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writerâ€™s argument?
A. The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.
B. Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
C. The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly
different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.
D. The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.
E. The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.
If you have any questions
New!
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5062
Location: Singapore
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 368 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2006, 00:24
E is the answer. If the average length of apprenticeship has declined, then it is not because the carpener put in more effort, it is simply he has not mastered everything yet...
VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1025
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2006, 01:47
I would go with D.

D because, only the best quality buildings built before 1930 remained. And all the buildings that were built without that level of skill, care, effort were demolished. So whatever buildings that remain from before 1930 are naturally better in terms of quality compared to those built later.

Argument says "noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward"

Generally superior and not true in all the cases. Generally superior because the sample is not representative of the all the buildings built before 1930 and after 1930. D is weakening the argument.

E says: The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930. A possible consequence is less mastery, and less skill in the work done. E is not weakening, and to a certain extent strengthening the argument.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5062
Location: Singapore
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 368 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2006, 01:56
yeah.. missed that point..
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2005
Posts: 454
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2006, 06:01
ak_idc wrote:
I would go with D.

D because, only the best quality buildings built before 1930 remained. And all the buildings that were built without that level of skill, care, effort were demolished. So whatever buildings that remain from before 1930 are naturally better in terms of quality compared to those built later.

Argument says "noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward"

Generally superior and not true in all the cases. Generally superior because the sample is not representative of the all the buildings built before 1930 and after 1930. D is weakening the argument.

E says: The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930. A possible consequence is less mastery, and less skill in the work done. E is not weakening, and to a certain extent strengthening the argument.

You are surely on FIRE, I am confident you are going to NAIL the GMAT
Director
Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 743
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2006, 08:19
D for me as well.

Well only buildings with good carpentary work are still standing. All the others have been demolished...
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5238
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 383 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2006, 23:21
Only the best hotels built since 1930 have survived. What about the other 95% that have been leveled or refurbished.

08 Nov 2006, 23:21
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the 5 08 Jan 2008, 07:37
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the 13 29 Nov 2007, 03:45
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the 8 20 Oct 2007, 09:15
10 Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the 16 29 Sep 2007, 10:13
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the 10 27 Jun 2007, 05:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by