GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 22 Jul 2018, 11:37

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 04 Dec 2016
Posts: 29
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2017, 09:36
soodia wrote:
hanumayamma wrote:
Conclusion: Carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skills, care and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

(A) The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores. [This weakens the argument as carpentry in hotels is generally superior – implies less emphasis on carpenters’ care and effort – hold it]

(B) Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930. [Hotel accommodation is out of scope of the argument – eliminate it]

(C) The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the material available to carpenters working after 1930. [The material available for carpenters is out of scope of argument – eliminate it]

(D) The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.[Hotel usage is out of scope of the argument – eliminate it]

(E) The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.[This strengthens the conclusion – eliminate it]

I have a question here!
choice B says more people in hotels after 1930, so we can conclude more guests, more use, more harm! so the hotels before 1930 which had less guess look better!

am I wrong?

Hi Soodia

The MAIN ISSUE is : before 1930 Hotels carpentry > after 1930 hotels' carpentry
WHY ? Carpenters more skilled before 1930 than after 1930

Now we need to break this relation.
The option that you have chosen is not in DIRECT LINE to this issue...Capacity of hotels is not discussed here. Also you are assuming a lot
HOW?
C the bold parts are very far fetched assumptions which are deviating from the relationships stated here...so these are IRRELEVANT

more people in hotels after 1930, so we can conclude more guests, more use, more harm! so the hotels before 1930 which had less guess look better!

Hope this helps
Regards
S
Manager
Joined: 30 Apr 2013
Posts: 90
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2017, 04:53
Can some expert explain this in detail? I chose E and its wrong
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1052
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2017, 13:22
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?

(A) The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores. -We are comparing the hotels with hotels in the passage.

(B) Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930. -More guests? Out of scope

(C) The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930. -This strengthens the argument because if the materials available to the carpenters of both the eras are same then the authors conclusion is correct.

(D) The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished. -Correct. Good quality things stay stable for longer time. Thus, the author visited only good quality hotels. Hence we can't conclude that "all" previous era carpenters are better.

(E) The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930. -Out of scope
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Long And A Fruitful Journey - V21 to V41; If I can, So Can You!!

Preparing for RC my way

My study resources:
1. Useful Formulae, Concepts and Tricks-Quant
2. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation
3. LSAT RC compilation
4. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal
5. QOTD RC (Carcass)
6. Challange OG RC
7. GMAT Prep Challenge RC

Director
Joined: 08 Jun 2015
Posts: 517
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Nov 2017, 06:44
+1 for D. Ask yourself - what if a lot of buildings built after 1930s did not sustain in the first place ? In other words, what if the sample space of buildings after 1930s did not have furniture of good enough quality ? Option D fits the bill. Hence option D is the right answer.
_________________

" The few , the fearless "

Manager
Joined: 21 Jul 2014
Posts: 66
GMAT Date: 07-30-2015
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2017, 06:23
I have two doubt:-

1. Do the premises say that the writer visited hotels that was built pre 1930 and hotels post 1930. Or is it that he visited hotels in the 1930s only.

2. Could you explain D: I understood that all the crappy buildings are likely to be demolished or the building still standing has superior carpentry. How does this statement weakens the argument.

GMATNinja and GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Posts: 284
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2017, 10:05
rajatbanik wrote:
I have two doubt:-

1. Do the premises say that the writer visited hotels that was built pre 1930 and hotels post 1930. Or is it that he visited hotels in the 1930s only.

2. Could you explain D: I understood that all the crappy buildings are likely to be demolished or the building still standing has superior carpentry. How does this statement weakens the argument.

GMATNinja and GMATNinjaTwo

1) Since the writer noticed that pre-1930 hotels had superior quality, we can infer that the writer has visited hotels built after 1930 as well (otherwise how else could he/she make a comparison?).
2) Stay tuned for an official explanation here! Please use that thread for additional questions (this one will be locked).

Thanks!
_________________
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 17084
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2017, 23:01
THIS TOPIC HAS BEEN LOCKED AND DECOMMISSIONED

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.

_________________

Founder of GMAT Club

Just starting out with GMAT? Start here... or use our Daily Study Plan

Co-author of the GMAT Club tests

Re: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav &nbs [#permalink] 18 Nov 2017, 23:01

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   [ 167 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and hav

Moderators: GMATNinja, GMATNinjaTwo

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.