sony1000 wrote:
Answer E brings in new information not mentioned on the argument. Answer E speaks of Amazon basin, no where in the argument Amazon basin is mentioned, the problem I have with E is that the other answer choices are crapy too. Also, E mentions high species , once again the argument does not say how many species developed, from the argument we can not conlcude it was a high number or a low number. of new species.
Hi It is all about to choose the best among all, so option E is one of the most apt, indeed there are new words introduced but the other option is no where in the line and we can say they are out of scope .
Main Idea:
Periodic geographic isolation of related populations(there have been an estimated 13 ice ages to date) would have facilitated the development of new species as existing species on the lowlands adopted to changing climates.
Let us take each option one by one:
A.Provide proof that cooler and drier temperatures were primarily responsible for the distribution of species in the Amazon. ->
Conclusion is all about Geographical isolation which may lead to diversity because of changing climate. So Out of Scope.B.Explain how population of species was protected from extinction in the amazon basin -
No where it is written how it is protected. Rather the whole idea is how species is adopted with changing climate.C.Explain how most species were able to survive periodic climatic disturbances in the Amazon basin. -
The idea is how isolation of different species has facilitated the developing of new species. D.Suggest that certain types of climatic disturbances cause more species diversity than other types of climatic disturbances.
There is no where comparison of different type of climate disturbances.E.Suggest that geographical isolation may have occured often enough to cause high species diversity in the Amazon basin.
yes amazon basic is new but idea is intact.