GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 25 Jun 2019, 15:38

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Hector: Government welfare programs are much less efficient than

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
CR Forum Moderator
avatar
V
Joined: 25 Apr 2018
Posts: 579
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Hector: Government welfare programs are much less efficient than  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 May 2019, 08:13
1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

76% (01:57) correct 24% (01:47) wrong based on 58 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics


Hector: Government welfare programs are much less efficient than private charities. Since people donate more to charities when they have more, income tax rates should be decreased so as to increase benefits to those now served by government welfare programs.

Andromache: Income tax rates should be reduced so as to leave taxpayers with more disposable income. This in turn will lead to greater spending and investment, which will stimulate our stagnant economy by making increased production more profitable.

Which of the following best describes the logical relationship between the two arguments above?

A. They endorse the same course of action for different purposes.

B. They endorse different courses of action intended to achieve the same goal.

C. The effects that they argue will follow from decreasing income tax rates are contradictory.

D. They disagree over the fundamental purpose behind the government's taxation of personal income.

E. Andromache provides additional evidence for Hector's claim that reducing income tax rates will benefit people now served by national welfare programs.

_________________
Please give kudos if you found my posts helpful!

Project CR Butler - 2 CR's everyday
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Posts: 81
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Hector: Government welfare programs are much less efficient than  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 May 2019, 10:07
gmat1393 wrote:
Hector: Government welfare programs are much less efficient than private charities. Since people donate more to charities when they have more, income tax rates should be decreased so as to increase benefits to those now served by government welfare programs.

Andromache: Income tax rates should be reduced so as to leave taxpayers with more disposable income. This in turn will lead to greater spending and investment, which will stimulate our stagnant economy by making increased production more profitable.

Which of the following best describes the logical relationship between the two arguments above?

A. They endorse the same course of action for different purposes.

B. They endorse different courses of action intended to achieve the same goal.

C. The effects that they argue will follow from decreasing income tax rates are contradictory.

D. They disagree over the fundamental purpose behind the government's taxation of personal income.

E. Andromache provides additional evidence for Hector's claim that reducing income tax rates will benefit people now served by national welfare programs.


I think the answer is C .

The aftereffects of the decreasing income tax rates are contradictory.
Hector says that since people donate more when they have more , thus decreasing income tax will lead to increase benefits served by government charities.
On the other hand, Andromache says decrease in income tax will lead to more disposable income which in turn will strengthen stagnant economy.

Please let me know if I’m wrong.
Thanks
_________________
Hope it helps,

Thanks,
Mofe Bhatia
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 20 Mar 2019
Posts: 26
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Hector: Government welfare programs are much less efficient than  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jun 2019, 21:51
MofeBhatia wrote:
gmat1393 wrote:
Hector: Government welfare programs are much less efficient than private charities. Since people donate more to charities when they have more, income tax rates should be decreased so as to increase benefits to those now served by government welfare programs.

Andromache: Income tax rates should be reduced so as to leave taxpayers with more disposable income. This in turn will lead to greater spending and investment, which will stimulate our stagnant economy by making increased production more profitable.

Which of the following best describes the logical relationship between the two arguments above?

A. They endorse the same course of action for different purposes.

B. They endorse different courses of action intended to achieve the same goal.

C. The effects that they argue will follow from decreasing income tax rates are contradictory.

D. They disagree over the fundamental purpose behind the government's taxation of personal income.

E. Andromache provides additional evidence for Hector's claim that reducing income tax rates will benefit people now served by national welfare programs.


I think the answer is C .

The aftereffects of the decreasing income tax rates are contradictory.
Hector says that since people donate more when they have more , thus decreasing income tax will lead to increase benefits served by government charities.
On the other hand, Andromache says decrease in income tax will lead to more disposable income which in turn will strengthen stagnant economy.

Please let me know if I’m wrong.
Thanks


Well, the problem with the answer choice is that the after effects are not "contradictory" to these each. Andromache believes reducing income tax would cause spending to increase. While hector believe reducing income tax would cause people to give more, hence increasing their spending! I definitely considered C, but felt as A was the right choice because both are endorsing the same course of action (reducing income tax) for different purposes (help people served under welfare programs vs stimulating a stagnating economy)
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Hector: Government welfare programs are much less efficient than   [#permalink] 24 Jun 2019, 21:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Hector: Government welfare programs are much less efficient than

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne