Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet after t seconds, where h = -16 (t - 3)2 + 150. At what height, in feet, is the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

Re: Height of an object thrown upwards [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Nov 2007, 15:07

gregspirited wrote:

An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet after t seconds, where h = -16 (t - 3)2 + 150. At what height, in feet, is the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

Re: Height of an object thrown upwards [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Nov 2007, 17:43

gregspirited wrote:

An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet after t seconds, where h = -16 (t - 3)2 + 150. At what height, in feet, is the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

A. 6 B. 86 C. 134 D 150 E. 214

Is this written correctly? why do we have -16(t-3)2? why not just

-32(t-3). Just making sure i am reading this correctly.

Re: Height of an object thrown upwards [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Nov 2007, 17:57

gregspirited wrote:

An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet after t seconds, where h = -16 (t - 3)2 + 150. At what height, in feet, is the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

A. 6 B. 86 C. 134 D 150 E. 214

B,

The object reaches its max height when t=3.
To find the height two seconds after the object reaches its max height means to find height when t=5.

Schools: Chicago Booth R2 (WL), Wharton R2 w/ int, Kellogg R2 w/ int

WE 1: Global Operations (Futures & Portfolio Financing) - Hedge Fund ($10bn+ Multi-Strat)

WE 2: Investment Analyst (Credit strategies) - Fund of Hedge Fund ($10bn+ Multi-Strat)

Re: Height of an object thrown upwards [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Nov 2007, 18:41

GMATBLACKBELT wrote:

gregspirited wrote:

An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet after t seconds, where h = -16 (t - 3)2 + 150. At what height, in feet, is the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

A. 6 B. 86 C. 134 D 150 E. 214

Is this written correctly? why do we have -16(t-3)2? why not just

-32(t-3). Just making sure i am reading this correctly.

Looks like a bogus question to me. I dont see how it could be written correctly. If "h = -16 (t - 3)2 + 150." is right then it reaches maximum height at ZERO seconds. h = -32(0-3) + 150 = 236

Re: Height of an object thrown upwards [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Nov 2007, 18:58

robertrdzak wrote:

GMATBLACKBELT wrote:

gregspirited wrote:

An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet after t seconds, where h = -16 (t - 3)2 + 150. At what height, in feet, is the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

A. 6 B. 86 C. 134 D 150 E. 214

Is this written correctly? why do we have -16(t-3)2? why not just

-32(t-3). Just making sure i am reading this correctly.

Looks like a bogus question to me. I dont see how it could be written correctly. If "h = -16 (t - 3)2 + 150." is right then it reaches maximum height at ZERO seconds. h = -32(0-3) + 150 = 236

i doubt my answer now...

t can not be negative, and it can not be zero, zero would mean the object did not move at all, and if it is thrown upwards, then h (t=0) is defenetely is not the max height.

but it makes sense that the closer t is to zero the higher is h, let`s say t is very close to zero, then h after 2 seconds must be very close to h (t=2)

Re: Height of an object thrown upwards [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Nov 2007, 19:13

gregspirited wrote:

An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet after t seconds, where h = -16 (t - 3)2 + 150. At what height, in feet, is the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

A. 6 B. 86 C. 134 D 150 E. 214

I thought when t = 1 - you get the max height.

-16(-2)2 + 150 = 214

and the fall in height in 2 sec is

-16(-1)2 + 150 = 182.

the diff. I got was 32 ..but none of the answer choices is 32. Dont know where I am going wrong.

Height of an object thrown upwards ... Wrong Equation [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Nov 2007, 19:56

The equation is incorrect to start with. As I querried my system for past discussions on this particular question, I found that the original equation is:

h=-16(t-3)^2+150

I think that explains why gregspirited had the confusion, triggering all the follow-up posts. Also, this question was debated for a long time on beatthegmat.com forums. I'm including a link for the discussion thread on beatthegmat.com to help those curious souls that have enough patience and interest in seeing what all possible solutions were arrived at when the posted the wrong equation..

Sorry Guys...My equation was wrong as wizard had posted. It should be ^2 and not *2. I was in bit hurry when I posted.
But when ^2 it is a valid question and good one too.