It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 19:17

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Posts: 131

Kudos [?]: 941 [0], given: 0

Location: Corea
Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2004, 06:55
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:13) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 4 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted annually to determine the population of each village. Village census records for the last half of the 1600â€™s are remarkably complete. This very completeness makes one point stand out; in five different years, villages overwhelmingly reported significant population declines. Tellingly, each of those five years immediately followed an increase in a certain Drindian tax. This tax, which was assessed on villages, was computed by the central government using the annual census figures. Obviously, whenever the tax went up, villages had an especially powerful economic incentive to minimize the number of people they recorded; and concealing the size of a villageâ€™s population from government census takers would have been easy. Therefore, it is reasonable to think that the reported declines did not happen.
In the historianâ€™s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

K. The first supplies a context for the historianâ€™s argument; the second acknowledges a consideration that has been used to argue against the position the historian seeks to establish.
L. The first presents evidence to support the position that the historian seeks to establish; the second acknowledges a consideration that has been used to argue against that position.
M. The first provides a context for certain evidence that supports the position that the historian seeks to establish; the second is that position.
N. The first is a position for which the historian argues; the second is an assumption that serves as the basis of that argument.
O. The first is an assumption that the historian explicitly makes in arguing for a certain position; the second acknowledges a consideration that calls that assumption into question.

Kudos [?]: 941 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 124

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Location: US

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2004, 10:36
Is it M ?

I feel second bold faced text is the conclusion of the argument. Only M has that choice.

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4285

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2004, 15:20
M it is
historian position: it is not true that population increased(historian's position as mentioned by 2nd BF) despite given evidence(remarkable accuracy of 1600's census records) because of the reasons given
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 03 Aug 2004
Posts: 45

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Nov 2004, 13:54
Q1 What is the difference between

Quote:
K. The first supplies a context for the historianâ€™s argument; the second acknowledges a consideration that has been used to argue against the position the historian seeks to establish.

M. The first provides a context for certain evidence that supports the position that the historian seeks to establish; the second is that position.

Point 1
The first supplies a context for the historianâ€™s argument v/s The first provides a context for certain evidence that supports the position that the historian seeks to establish

Point 2
the second acknowledges a consideration that has been used to argue against the position the historian seeks to establish.
v/s
the second is that position

Q2 How is a context different from assumption .. dont both mean assumptions

Q3 doesnt acknowledges a consideration mean a conclusion

Any tips on BF questions ?

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1431

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2005, 21:55
Paul wrote:
M it is
historian position: it is not true that population increased(historian's position as mentioned by 2nd BF) despite given evidence(remarkable accuracy of 1600's census records) because of the reasons given

Paul,

Although I also chose "M"...as none other was a better option, still option "M" says "certain evidence that supports the position"....on the contrary the evidence doesn't support the author's position...it contradicts it ?

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 604

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2005, 08:10
Chose M for lack of a better one..

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Dec 2004
Posts: 274

Kudos [?]: 200 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2005, 13:38
"M" for Me.

First one is evidence or context of it.

Hence POE => L or M
Second one is the position historian is trying to come at.

M wins.
_________________

"Forums are meant to benefit all. No one is interested in knowing what your guesses are. Please explain the reasoning behind the answer you chose. This will also help you organize your thoughts quickly during the exam."

Kudos [?]: 200 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 556

Kudos [?]: 272 [0], given: 0

Location: SF Bay Area, USA

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2005, 19:28
Why not O?
Village census records for the last half of the 1600â€™s are remarkably complete
seems like an assumption to me as he would not know that the census is complete

the reported declines did not happen
calls the assumption to question as it proves census was not complete!

Kudos [?]: 272 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 556

Kudos [?]: 272 [0], given: 0

Location: SF Bay Area, USA

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2005, 14:21
Can somebody convince me why it is not O?

What is the OA?

Kudos [?]: 272 [0], given: 0

25 Jan 2005, 14:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by