Quote:
The health minister recently argued for a policy of Prohibition to be implemented across the country. While making it clear that there were no plans for a nationwide implementation of this policy, he strongly opposed the growing culture of alcohol abuse amongst youngsters in the metropolises.. He pointed out that in metropolises like Bangalore and Chennai, this culture was the most rampant. According to According to a government survey, the average age of commencement of alcohol use in India has reduced from 28 years in 1990 to 19 years in 2008another survey, by a well-known NGO, in New Delhi, alcohol is available across the counter and does not require any license. Most importantly, according to the survey, youngsters as young as 15 could obtain alcohol from places like petrol pumps. From this data, the NGO concluded that alcoholism is becoming a major problem in India.
Which of the following, if true, significantly weakens the conclusion stated in the above passage?
A. The agencies involved in the surveys have totally overlooked the problem of alcohol abuse prevalent in rural India, which is by some estimates far graver than the problem in the metropolises.
B. The members of the NGO and the government have not been able to reach a consensus regarding the surveys.
C. The methods used to conduct the surveys are faulty in the sense that they concentrate on the percentage of people who consume alcohol, and not the duration of the addiction or any specific health effects of it.
D. The surveys have concentrated on only a specific section of the country's populace, and drawn conclusions based on the preferences of a very select and insignificant income group in society.
E. The surveys have not received official sanction from the executive organ of the government.
CRACK Verbal Explanation
The health minister recently argued for a policy of Prohibition to be implemented across the country. This is based on the reports available by a survey and what the NGOs have concluded (that alcoholism is becoming a major problem in India.)
If we have to weaken the argument then we need to attack the minister’s Major premise on which he bases his conclusion.
A. The agencies involved in the surveys have totally overlooked the problem of alcohol abuse prevalent in rural India, which is by some estimates far graver than the problem in the metropolises.
(There is no comparison between rural and Urban India, also this option will go in sync with Minister’s concern)B. The members of the NGO and the government have not been able to reach a consensus regarding the surveys.
(Lack of Consensus does not negate the veracity of the surveys)C. The methods used to conduct the surveys are faulty in the sense that they concentrate on the percentage of people who consume alcohol, and not the duration of the addiction or any specific health effects of it.
(Although it mentions survey can be flawed but finds no error in the percentage of people who consume alcohol but on scant data related to duration and effect of Alcohol. These are not parameters discussed by author – we are concerned about the licensing policy- Out of scope option.)D. The surveys have concentrated on only a specific section of the country's populace, and drawn conclusions based on the preferences of a very select and insignificant income group in society.
(If this is true, then nationwide implementation of a policy cannot be a right course of action – thus this option reduces the urgency or seriousness of the situation)E. The surveys have not received official sanction from the executive organ of the government.
(Official Sanction of government is not a criterion for a survey to be true or false)