It is currently 23 Nov 2017, 04:42

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Hotco oil burners, designed to be used in asphalt plants,

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 107

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 1

Hotco oil burners, designed to be used in asphalt plants, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 May 2010, 12:04
16
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

75% (01:30) correct 25% (01:40) wrong based on 1706 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Hotco oil burners, designed to be used in asphalt plants, are so efficient that Hotco will sell one to the Clifton Asphalt plant for no payment other than the cost savings between the total amount the asphalt plant actually paid for oil using its former burner during the last two years and the total amount it will pay for oil using the Hotco burner during the next two years. On installation, the plant will make an estimated payment, which will be adjusted after two years to equal the actual cost savings.

Which of the following, if it occurred, would constitute a disadvantage for Hotco of the plan described above?

A) Another manufacturer’s introduction to the market of a similarly efficient burner
B) The Clifton Asphalt plant’s need for more than one new burner
C) Very poor efficiency in the Clifton Asphalt plant’s old burner
D) A decrease in the demand for asphalt
E) A steady increase in the price of oil beginning soon after the new burner is installed

For some reason I can't understand this. Any help will be most appreciated.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 1

VP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1471

Kudos [?]: 793 [6], given: 6

Re: Difficult CR OG [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 May 2010, 13:19
6
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
is it (E)?

Hotco will get = amount paid for oil in last 2 years - amount paid for oil in next 2 years

now suppose the plant used 100 liters of oil in last 2 years at a price of \$2 per liter....which means the plant spent \$200 on oil

the price of oil is steadily increasing

now suppose the plane used 70 liters of oils (because the burner is efficient) in next 2 years at a price of \$2.30 per liter....which means the plant will spend \$161 on oil

Hotco will get = 200 - 161 = \$39 for its burner which will be disadvantageous for Hotco because of its plan.

Kudos [?]: 793 [6], given: 6

Intern
Affiliations: CFA
Joined: 09 Dec 2009
Posts: 37

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

Schools: Columbia Business School '13
Re: Difficult CR OG [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 May 2010, 15:16
Yep. Your logic is right. Even if the burner is much more efficient than the old one, if the price of oil goes through the roof, the cost savings could be nil.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 189

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 29

Re: Difficult CR OG [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 May 2010, 16:02
this is a hard one... intially i thought its D but cost of oil going up will reduce the amount paid to Hotco.... assuming same amouint is used.

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 29

Intern
Joined: 08 Nov 2009
Posts: 44

Kudos [?]: 11 [2], given: 1

Location: New York, NY
Schools: Columbia, NYU, Wharton, UCLA, Berkeley
WE 1: 2 Yrs mgmt consulting
WE 2: 2 yrs m&a
Re: Difficult CR OG [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 May 2010, 09:51
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I think it's E.

As I read thru them, nothing really rang a bell until I got to E. Cuz if the price of oil goes up, then the cost savings for using this new burner becomes less and less. If the price goes up really high, then cost savings go to zero or even that there's negative cost savings (or that it ends up being more expensive than before). His payment is the cost savings, so if that goes to zero that's disadvantageous to the dude. Anybody disagree with E?

Kudos [?]: 11 [2], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Posts: 179

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 17

Re: Difficult CR OG [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 May 2010, 03:54
can somebody explain - why D is not right?

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 17

Manager
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 107

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 1

Re: Difficult CR OG [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 May 2010, 17:40
Yup the OA is E

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 31 Aug 2010
Posts: 42

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 2

Re: Difficult CR OG [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2010, 19:31
I just went over this problem and Chose D as well. I was stuck between D and E. Instinct took me to E first, but ultimately I thought that a D would also be a strong disadvantage is there was no asphalt production to claim the use of the oil...

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 2

Intern
Joined: 25 Dec 2006
Posts: 9

Kudos [?]: 3 [2], given: 2

Re: Difficult CR OG [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2010, 21:01
2
This post received
KUDOS
In my opinion D will end up being profitable for Hotco

Less Demand- Less Oil used-Greater Savings ( Assuming Oil prices stay the same)--More money for HOTCO...

E is Right..

Kudos [?]: 3 [2], given: 2

Senior Manager
Status: Can't give up
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 305

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 35

Re: Difficult CR OG [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Nov 2010, 13:20
Gosh this was a hard one > 3 minutes

E - using the key word "oil" also if the price of the oil goes up there won't be much savings Hotco would get back by selling it.

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 35

Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3381

Kudos [?]: 9310 [0], given: 1169

Re: Difficult CR OG [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2010, 11:12
maybe A ???? or not..........
_________________

Kudos [?]: 9310 [0], given: 1169

Manager
Status: swimming against the current
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 238

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 30

Location: Chennai, India
Re: Difficult CR OG [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2010, 09:44
fell for D
_________________

Gonna make it this time

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 30

Manager
Status: GMAT in 4 weeks
Joined: 28 Mar 2010
Posts: 179

Kudos [?]: 193 [0], given: 25

GPA: 3.89
Re: Difficult CR OG [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2011, 08:03
What kind of stimulus is it ? its first sentence is so long I was surely not able understand while doing it in timed practice.
Please check the sentence for grammatical errors
_________________

If you liked my post, please consider a Kudos for me. Thanks!

Kudos [?]: 193 [0], given: 25

Manager
Status: GMAT in 4 weeks
Joined: 28 Mar 2010
Posts: 179

Kudos [?]: 193 [0], given: 25

GPA: 3.89
Re: Difficult CR OG [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2011, 08:07
After reading it twice I think it is E
_________________

If you liked my post, please consider a Kudos for me. Thanks!

Kudos [?]: 193 [0], given: 25

Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 621

Kudos [?]: 284 [0], given: 51

Re: Difficult CR OG [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Apr 2011, 11:42
has to be E . and the explanation given above is accurate.

suppose the price for oil goes up so much that same amount of work costs more with hotco at new oil price than it used to cost with old burner at old oil prices.

then hotco will in fact have to pay money to the asphalt company according to the agreement,
as cost savings will be negative
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Kudos [?]: 284 [0], given: 51

VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1283

Kudos [?]: 286 [0], given: 10

Re: Difficult CR OG [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Apr 2011, 18:51
Straight E.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Kudos [?]: 286 [0], given: 10

Manager
Status: struggling with GMAT
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Posts: 200

Kudos [?]: 449 [0], given: 46

Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Accounting
GMAT Date: 04-06-2013
GPA: 3.65
Re: Hotco oil burners, designed to be used in asphalt plants, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Apr 2013, 10:20
run4run wrote:
Hotco oil burners, designed to be used in asphalt plants, are so efficient that Hotco will sell one to the Clifton Asphalt plant for no payment other than the cost savings between the total amount the asphalt plant actually paid for oil using its former burner during the last two years and the total amount it will pay for oil using the Hotco burner during the next two years. On installation, the plant will make an estimated payment, which will be adjusted after two years to equal the actual cost savings.

Which of the following, if it occurred, would constitute a disadvantage for Hotco of the plan described above?

A) Another manufacturer’s introduction to the market of a similarly efficient burner
B) The Clifton Asphalt plant’s need for more than one new burner
C) Very poor efficiency in the Clifton Asphalt plant’s old burner
D) A decrease in the demand for asphalt
E) A steady increase in the price of oil beginning soon after the new burner is installed

I am not understanding the content of the argument.Need every answer choice`s explanation

Kudos [?]: 449 [0], given: 46

Intern
Joined: 19 Apr 2011
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 11

Re: Hotco oil burners, designed to be used in asphalt plants, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 May 2013, 09:17
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Situation: Hotco selling burner to CA plant
Transaction details : CA plant will pay X+Y amount (say). This breakdown can be explained as below:
X = Cost savings of the plant using old burner
Y = Future cost savings using hotco burner. (hotco is very confident about the savings as their burners are really efficient)
Now, the argument concludes with a plan whereby the CA plant will make an estimated payment(unrealised amount) & this amount will be adjusted on the actual cost savings after 2 years. So, Cost savings > estimated payment; the plant will pay hotco, the difference & vice versa.

Best way to attack this is to think about Y component, ie:- savings based on the installation of hotco burner(projected cash savings for 2 yrs). That is the unknown part. We cannot do much on X as we already know the savings using old burner(last 2 yrs)

Now if oil prices shoot up after the new installation, CA plant's savings is directly affected & thereby endangering hotco's plan, which will eventually lead hotco to a loss.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 11

Intern
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 11 [3], given: 7

Re: Hotco oil burners, designed to be used in asphalt plants, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 May 2013, 03:02
3
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
mun23 wrote:
run4run wrote:
Hotco oil burners, designed to be used in asphalt plants, are so efficient that Hotco will sell one to the Clifton Asphalt plant for no payment other than the cost savings between the total amount the asphalt plant actually paid for oil using its former burner during the last two years and the total amount it will pay for oil using the Hotco burner during the next two years. On installation, the plant will make an estimated payment, which will be adjusted after two years to equal the actual cost savings.

Which of the following, if it occurred, would constitute a disadvantage for Hotco of the plan described above?

A) Another manufacturer’s introduction to the market of a similarly efficient burner
B) The Clifton Asphalt plant’s need for more than one new burner
C) Very poor efficiency in the Clifton Asphalt plant’s old burner
D) A decrease in the demand for asphalt
E) A steady increase in the price of oil beginning soon after the new burner is installed

I am not understanding the content of the argument.Need every answer choice`s explanation

I am giving it a try here to explain this:

Hotco will run into losses if the diference in the amount paid by Clifton asphalt manufacturing company in the last 2 yrs is close enuf to the cost that the compnay will pay in the nex t2 yrs. ok !!
Now lets analyse the answers.

A) Another manufacturer’s introduction to the market of a similarly efficient burner - there is no comparision with other manufacturers. irrelevant. INCORRECT

B) The Clifton Asphalt plant’s need for more than one new burner. - out of scope. INCORRECT

C) Very poor efficiency in the Clifton Asphalt plant’s old burner. - might sound true. but this is a catch. we cannot compare efficiencies of old and new burner.INCORRECT

D) A decrease in the demand for asphalt. - we have no clue what demand of asphalt has to do with oil burners. this is verbal section in gmat not a physics exam in a college. INCORRECT.

E) A steady increase in the price of oil beginning soon after the new burner is installed- If the price of oil increases, the company will have to pay more for its oil in the coming 2 yrs. so the difference in price will reduce and HETCO will receive less in return. - CORRECT.

Last edited by myselfhari on 06 May 2013, 13:39, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 11 [3], given: 7

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 349

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 41

Location: European union
Re: Hotco oil burners, designed to be used in asphalt plants, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 May 2013, 13:35
How the hell to answer this when I have no idea what oil burner is and what the whole passage talks about...

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 41

Re: Hotco oil burners, designed to be used in asphalt plants,   [#permalink] 06 May 2013, 13:35

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 42 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Hotco oil burners, designed to be used in asphalt plants,

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.