It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 20:48

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Household indebtedness, which some theorists regard as

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 574

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

Location: San Jose, CA
Household indebtedness, which some theorists regard as [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2004, 02:19
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Household indebtedness, which some theorists regard as causing recession, was high preceding the recent recession, but so was the value of assets owned by households. Admittedly, if most of the assets were owned by quite affluent households, and most of the debt was owed by low-income households, high household debt levels could have been the cause of the recession despite high asset values: low-income households might have decreased spending in order to pay off debts while the quite affluent ones might simply have failed to increase spending. But, in fact, quite affluent people must have owed most of the household debt, since money is not lent to those without assets. Therefore, the real cause must lie elsewhere.

11. Which one of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the argument?

(A) Prior to the recent recession, middle-income households owed enough debt that they had begun to decrease spending.

(B) The total value of the economy’s household debt is exceeded by the total value of assets held by households.

(C) Low-income households somewhat decreased their spending during the recent recession.

(D) During a recession the affluent usually borrow money only in order to purchase assets.

(E) Household debt is the category of debt least likely to affect the economy.

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2004
Posts: 35

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

Location: Mumbai INDIA
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2004, 03:42
I feel C should be the answer....

since the question is : 11. Which one of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the argument?

If C is true, then the author's argument "But, in fact, quite affluent people must have owed most of the household debt, since money is not lent to those without assets. Therefore, the real cause must lie elsewhere" becomes weak.

Its a good question...what the official answer.....

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 179

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2004, 14:35
Very nice question. It has taken me almost 3 minutes to answer it.

My analysis as follows.

D and E are just restating the conclusion of the author. We need to identify a choice which provides information to prove that the author's conclusion is wrong.

Putting it short, the author feels that increase or decrease in spending doesnt have to do much with the recession.

Choice A and C provides some relation between these two.

A tells us about middle income which showed a similar graph in the recent recession. While C says that the Low income group has reduced spending.

I would prefer picking up C as it is concerned with the context, even though A gives us some similar information.

Thanks

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 349

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Location: Manhattan
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2004, 15:17
tough question, I'll go with A. C seems to be already contained in the text

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Posts: 272

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2004, 16:24
Tough question.. I'll choose C for similar reasons as above. If a had cited "low income" rather than "middle income", i would have chosen A.

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 574

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

Location: San Jose, CA
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2004, 21:46
The OA is A
Tough Question indeed!
both A and C are contenders and I think lastochka's logic of eliminating C makes sense

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 217

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Aug 2004, 08:21
went for A

C is no good because it says what was happening DURING the recession. The conclusion however is about WHAT CAUSED the recession

A reinstates the contention that it was household indebtedness that caused the recession

the question is trickily worded and looks really tough

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 16 Aug 2004, 08:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Household indebtedness, which some theorists regard as

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.