It is currently 24 Sep 2017, 18:11

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# How many integers are there between, but not including

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2011
Posts: 213

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 39

Location: Accra, Ghana
How many integers are there between, but not including [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Mar 2012, 01:19
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

70% (00:38) correct 30% (00:56) wrong based on 261 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

How many integers are there between, but not including, integers r and s ?

(1) s – r = 10
(2) There are 9 integers between, but not including, r + 1 and s + 1.

I may have mistakenly chosen the wrong answer, but nevertheless some expert explanation will help me understand this better.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 39

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 41699

Kudos [?]: 124811 [0], given: 12079

Re: How many integers are there between, but not including [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Mar 2012, 01:38
How many integers are there between, but not including, integers r and s ?

Notice that we are told that r and s are integers.

(1) s – r = 10 --> since r and s are integers and s – r = 10 then there will be 9 integers between them. For example take s=10 and r=0, then there are following integers between them: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Sufficient.

(2) There are 9 integers between, but not including, r + 1 and s + 1 --> the distance between r and s is the same as the distance between r+1 and s+1, so if there are 9 integers between, but not including, r+1 and s+1 then there will be 9 integers between, but not including, r and s too. For example consider s+1=11 and r+1=1 (9 integers between them: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10) --> s=10 and r=0 the same as above. Sufficient.

Hope it's clear.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 124811 [0], given: 12079

Intern
Status: I laugh all day, and scrabble all night. I badazzle my clothes, so my outfits tight.
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Posts: 3

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: How many integers are there between, but not including [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2012, 18:42
nice explanation!

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 153

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 31

Location: India
Re: How many integers are there between, but not including [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2012, 04:12
number of integers including s and r = s-r+1. Number of integers excluding s and r = s-r+1-2 = s-r-1.

1) gives us s-r-1 = 9. Sufficient
2) The number of integers between s and r will be the same as number of integers between s+1 and r+1 = 9 .Sufficient.

Hence D

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 31

Manager
Joined: 13 Feb 2012
Posts: 144

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 85

Location: Italy
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 560 Q36 V34
GPA: 3.1
WE: Sales (Transportation)
Re: How many integers are there between, but not including [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2012, 05:41
I might be wrong, but I think the second part of statement 2) : "not including r+1 and s+1" is useless since it does not change anything to the distance the two values are apart.

At least this is how I got D.
_________________

"The Burnout" - My Debrief

Kudos if I helped you

Andy

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 85

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 41699

Kudos [?]: 124811 [1], given: 12079

Re: How many integers are there between, but not including [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2012, 06:07
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
highdiving wrote:
I might be wrong, but I think the second part of statement 2) : "not including r+1 and s+1" is useless since it does not change anything to the distance the two values are apart.

At least this is how I got D.

If we were not told that, then yes the statement would still be sufficient, but in this case the two statements would contradict each other: answer from (1) would be 9, and the answer from (2) would be 7.

Note that: on the GMAT, two data sufficiency statements always provide TRUE information and these statements never contradict each other.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 124811 [1], given: 12079

Manager
Joined: 13 Feb 2012
Posts: 144

Kudos [?]: 10 [1], given: 85

Location: Italy
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 560 Q36 V34
GPA: 3.1
WE: Sales (Transportation)
Re: How many integers are there between, but not including [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2012, 06:39
1
KUDOS
I must be missing something and I am sorry to bother you: but why would I even need to consider s+1 when I am looking for numbers between them? Maybe Im just assuming s is the upper end and so on.

Thank you for your time and patience.

Posted from my mobile device
_________________

"The Burnout" - My Debrief

Kudos if I helped you

Andy

Kudos [?]: 10 [1], given: 85

VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1411

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 916

Re: How many integers are there between, but not including [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Feb 2013, 00:16
THERE ARE og question which ask about the number of even interger between 2 numbers. This is more cheating.
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 916

Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 125

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 45

Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Operations
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 590 Q48 V23
GPA: 3.9
WE: Operations (Manufacturing)
Re: How many integers are there between, but not including [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Feb 2013, 00:36
In general number of integeres when extreme numbers are omiitted is s-r-1 .

A. Since s-r=10, so answer is 9, hence A is fine
B. Again difference b/w r+1 & s+1 is s-r-1, so B is also is fiine.

so D .

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 45

SVP
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 1742

Kudos [?]: 418 [0], given: 49

Re: How many integers are there between, but not including [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2013, 06:40
Bunuel wrote:
How many integers are there between, but not including, integers r and s ?

Notice that we are told that r and s are integers.

(1) s – r = 10 --> since r and s are integers and s – r = 10 then there will be 9 integers between them. For example take s=10 and r=0, then there are following integers between them: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Sufficient.

(2) There are 9 integers between, but not including, r + 1 and s + 1 --> the distance between r and s is the same as the distance between r+1 and s+1, so if there are 9 integers between, but not including, r+1 and s+1 then there will be 9 integers between, but not including, r and s too. For example consider s+1=11 and r+1=1 (9 integers between them: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10) --> s=10 and r=0 the same as above. Sufficient.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunuel , if i am not mistaken , why are we assuming that r and s belongs to an evenly spaced set of integers ??

Kudos [?]: 418 [0], given: 49

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 41699

Kudos [?]: 124811 [0], given: 12079

Re: How many integers are there between, but not including [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2013, 08:21
yezz wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
How many integers are there between, but not including, integers r and s ?

Notice that we are told that r and s are integers.

(1) s – r = 10 --> since r and s are integers and s – r = 10 then there will be 9 integers between them. For example take s=10 and r=0, then there are following integers between them: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Sufficient.

(2) There are 9 integers between, but not including, r + 1 and s + 1 --> the distance between r and s is the same as the distance between r+1 and s+1, so if there are 9 integers between, but not including, r+1 and s+1 then there will be 9 integers between, but not including, r and s too. For example consider s+1=11 and r+1=1 (9 integers between them: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10) --> s=10 and r=0 the same as above. Sufficient.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunuel , if i am not mistaken , why are we assuming that r and s belongs to an evenly spaced set of integers ??

Not sure I understand what you mean.

s and r are just two integers. The question asks: how many integers are there between, but not including r and s.

Ask yourself, how many integers are there between, but not including, 0 and 10? The answer is 9: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 124811 [0], given: 12079

Intern
Joined: 15 May 2012
Posts: 41

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 94

Re: How many integers are there between, but not including [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 May 2013, 04:51
Bunuel wrote:
How many integers are there between, but not including, integers r and s ?

Notice that we are told that r and s are integers.

(1) s – r = 10 --> since r and s are integers and s – r = 10 then there will be 9 integers between them. For example take s=10 and r=0, then there are following integers between them: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Sufficient.

(2) There are 9 integers between, but not including, r + 1 and s + 1 --> the distance between r and s is the same as the distance between r+1 and s+1, so if there are 9 integers between, but not including, r+1 and s+1 then there will be 9 integers between, but not including, r and s too. For example consider s+1=11 and r+1=1 (9 integers between them: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10) --> s=10 and r=0 the same as above. Sufficient.

Hope it's clear.

But, Bunuel - Considering your example in the first case in which r=0 and s=10, the number of integers between them could be maximum 9 or it could be any number less than that. Because, there is no mention of the word "consecutive" in the question. But, the second one clearly states that there are 9 integers. Hence B is sufficient, but A is not! Can you please explain where I am going wrong? Since this is an official problem and also you had solved it, I am 100% confident that D is the answer, but, I want to know where I am going wrong.
Thanks!

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 94

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 41699

Kudos [?]: 124811 [0], given: 12079

Re: How many integers are there between, but not including [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 May 2013, 04:57
sharmila79 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
How many integers are there between, but not including, integers r and s ?

Notice that we are told that r and s are integers.

(1) s – r = 10 --> since r and s are integers and s – r = 10 then there will be 9 integers between them. For example take s=10 and r=0, then there are following integers between them: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Sufficient.

(2) There are 9 integers between, but not including, r + 1 and s + 1 --> the distance between r and s is the same as the distance between r+1 and s+1, so if there are 9 integers between, but not including, r+1 and s+1 then there will be 9 integers between, but not including, r and s too. For example consider s+1=11 and r+1=1 (9 integers between them: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10) --> s=10 and r=0 the same as above. Sufficient.

Hope it's clear.

But, Bunuel - Considering your example in the first case in which r=0 and s=10, the number of integers between them could be maximum 9 or it could be any number less than that. Because, there is no mention of the word "consecutive" in the question. But, the second one clearly states that there are 9 integers. Hence B is sufficient, but A is not! Can you please explain where I am going wrong? Since this is an official problem and also you had solved it, I am 100% confident that D is the answer, but, I want to know where I am going wrong.
Thanks!

You don't need the word "consecutive".

How many integers are there between, but not including 1 and 3? Only one integer: 2.
How many integers are there between, but not including 1 and 5? Three: 2, 3, and 4.

Similarly: how many integers are there between, but not including, 0 and 10? The answer is 9: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9.

Hope it's clear.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 124811 [0], given: 12079

Intern
Joined: 15 May 2012
Posts: 41

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 94

Re: How many integers are there between, but not including [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 May 2013, 10:39
Bunuel wrote:
sharmila79 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
How many integers are there between, but not including, integers r and s ?

Notice that we are told that r and s are integers.

(1) s – r = 10 --> since r and s are integers and s – r = 10 then there will be 9 integers between them. For example take s=10 and r=0, then there are following integers between them: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Sufficient.

(2) There are 9 integers between, but not including, r + 1 and s + 1 --> the distance between r and s is the same as the distance between r+1 and s+1, so if there are 9 integers between, but not including, r+1 and s+1 then there will be 9 integers between, but not including, r and s too. For example consider s+1=11 and r+1=1 (9 integers between them: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10) --> s=10 and r=0 the same as above. Sufficient.

Hope it's clear.

But, Bunuel - Considering your example in the first case in which r=0 and s=10, the number of integers between them could be maximum 9 or it could be any number less than that. Because, there is no mention of the word "consecutive" in the question. But, the second one clearly states that there are 9 integers. Hence B is sufficient, but A is not! Can you please explain where I am going wrong? Since this is an official problem and also you had solved it, I am 100% confident that D is the answer, but, I want to know where I am going wrong.
Thanks!

You don't need the word "consecutive".

How many integers are there between, but not including 1 and 3? Only one integer: 2.
How many integers are there between, but not including 1 and 5? Three: 2, 3, and 4.

Similarly: how many integers are there between, but not including, 0 and 10? The answer is 9: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9.

Hope it's clear.

GMAT questions are tricky and they demand over- cautiousness! This is one such occasion...

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 94

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 17660

Kudos [?]: 272 [0], given: 0

Re: How many integers are there between, but not including [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2014, 14:48
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 272 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Status: The Final Countdown
Joined: 07 Mar 2013
Posts: 295

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 444

Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V41
GPA: 3.84
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: How many integers are there between, but not including [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2015, 09:09
Bunuel , why can't s and r be negative?s could be -10 and r could be 20 so s-r would still be 10 but the number of integers would be 30?I'm sure i'm missing something stupid here.
:/

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 444

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 41699

Kudos [?]: 124811 [0], given: 12079

Re: How many integers are there between, but not including [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2015, 09:11
Ralphcuisak wrote:
Bunuel , why can't s and r be negative?s could be -10 and r could be 20 so s-r would still be 10 but the number of integers would be 30?I'm sure i'm missing something stupid here.
:/

If s = -10 and r = 20, then s - r = -10 - 20 = -30, not 10.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 124811 [0], given: 12079

Current Student
Status: The Final Countdown
Joined: 07 Mar 2013
Posts: 295

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 444

Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V41
GPA: 3.84
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: How many integers are there between, but not including [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2015, 11:08
Oh.i knew its something stupid.This warrants a break.Thanks a ton Bunuel . You rock.

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 444

Re: How many integers are there between, but not including   [#permalink] 27 Jan 2015, 11:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by