Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 27 May 2017, 06:37

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2008
Posts: 244
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 354 [4] , given: 29

Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2009, 16:29
4
KUDOS
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

80% (01:55) correct 20% (01:05) wrong based on 1931 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in Greenrock National Forest's deer population over the past ten years. Yet clearly, black bears have also played an important role in this decline. In the past ten years, the forest's protected black bear population has risen sharply, and examination of black bears found dead in the forest during the deer hunting season showed that a number of them had recently fed on deer.

In the hunter's argument, the portion in boldface plays which of the following roles?

(A) It is the main conclusion of the argument.
(B) It is a finding that the argument seeks to explain.
(C) It is an explanation that the argument concludes is correct.
(D) It provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument.
(E) It introduces a judgment that the argument opposes
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Please give kudos if you enjoy the explanations that I have given. Thanks

Last edited by honchos on 10 Jun 2016, 01:32, edited 1 time in total.
Reformatted
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 17 Dec 2007
Posts: 101
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 8

Re: Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2009, 17:41
perfectstranger wrote:
Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in Greenrock National Forest's deer population over the past ten years. Yet clearly, black bears have also played an important role in this decline. In the past ten years, the forest's protected black bear population has risen sharply, and examination of black bears found dead in the forest during the deer hunting season showed that a number of them had recently fed on deer.
In the hunter's argument, the portion in boldface plays which of the following roles?
(A) It is the main conclusion of the argument.
(B) It is a finding that the argument seeks to explain.
(C) It is an explanation that the argument concludes is correct.
(D) It provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument.
(E) It introduces a judgment that the argument opposes

Please explain in a detailed reasoning.Nice explanation will be appreciated with kudos ) . OA after explanations.

Answer is E: Author's total argument is against this the judgement of many people that hunters alone are responsible for deer population decline
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Posts: 326
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 134 [0], given: 14

Re: Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2009, 17:47
Premise: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in Greenrock National Forest's deer population over the past ten years.
ConclusionYet clearly, black bears have also played an important role in this decline.

Premise :In the past ten years, the forest's protected black bear population has risen sharply, and examination of black bears found dead in the forest during the deer hunting season showed that a number of them had recently fed on deer.

Once you divide , you can see , ans :B

In the hunter's argument, the portion in boldface plays which of the following roles?
(A) It is the main conclusion of the argument. - no
(B) It is a finding that the argument seeks to explain. -yes
(C) It is an explanation that the argument concludes is correct. -no
(D) It provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument. - no
(E) It introduces a judgment that the argument opposes - no
_________________

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2009
Posts: 309
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 13

Re: Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2009, 01:04
IMO B
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 312
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 338 [2] , given: 9

Re: Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2009, 01:25
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I think the answer to this question should be E. Here's my line of reasoning

Premise: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in Greenrock National Forest's deer population over the past ten years.
Premise :In the past ten years, the forest's protected black bear population has risen sharply, and examination of black bears found dead in the forest during the deer hunting season showed that a number of them had recently fed on deer.

Conclusion: Yet clearly, black bears have also played an important role in this decline.

(A) It is the main conclusion of the argument.

No, the conclusion is that bears have also played an important role in this decline

(B) It is a finding that the argument seeks to explain.
No, The argument seeks to explain why black bears have played an important role for the decline in Greenrock National Forest's deer population

(C) It is an explanation that the argument concludes is correct.

The author concludes that this is not correct.

(D) It provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument.
This premise does not support the main conlusion.

(E) It introduces a judgment that the argument opposes -
Correct. The author concludes that the black bear has played an important role,so people should not blame only hunters.
Senior Manager
Joined: 27 May 2009
Posts: 268
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 421 [0], given: 18

Re: Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2009, 02:05
IMO B: I dont think argument opposes the first premises. .OA???
Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2008
Posts: 244
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 354 [0], given: 29

Re: Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2009, 03:49
OA:
[Reveal] Spoiler:
E

_________________

Please give kudos if you enjoy the explanations that I have given. Thanks

Manager
Joined: 17 Dec 2007
Posts: 101
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 8

Re: Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2009, 10:27
rohansherry wrote:
IMO B: I dont think argument opposes the first premises. .OA???

Yes it does, look at this way: the common belief is that hunters are responsible for deer population decline which is first bolded statement. The whole argument is against this to prove/conclude Black Bear play a great role and the hunters are not solely responsible
Manager
Joined: 15 Jun 2009
Posts: 156
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 8

Re: Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2009, 11:31
E it is.. nicely explained in above posts..
Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 631
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 241 [0], given: 51

Re: Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2011, 11:20
it is fairly simple e . whats the confusion with B ?
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Manager
Status: One last try =,=
Joined: 11 Jun 2010
Posts: 142
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 88 [3] , given: 32

Re: Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2011, 21:24
3
KUDOS
Apply the strategy in MGMAT CR:
- Conclusion: Black bears have also played an important role in this decline
- Premise for: In the past ten years, the forest's protected black bear population has risen sharply, and examination of black bears found dead in the forest during the deer hunting season showed that a number of them had recently fed on deer.
- Premise against: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in Greenrock National Forest's deer population over the past ten years.

This argument has a common structure of many CR problems: Some people claim/say that... Then an opposite idea appears to refute the initial opinion. Pay attention to the transitive word "YET" to spot the change in the argument.
_________________

There can be Miracles when you believe

Director
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 541
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 303 [3] , given: 75

Re: Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2013, 12:33
3
KUDOS
Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in Greenrock National Forest's deer population over the past ten years. Yet clearly, black bears have also played an important role in this decline. In the past ten years, the forest's protected black bear population has risen sharply, and examination of black bears found dead in the forest during the deer hunting season showed that a number of them had recently fed on deer.
In the hunter's argument, the portion in boldface plays which of the following roles?

(A) It is the main conclusion of the argument.
No. Not the main conclusion.
(B) It is a finding that the argument seeks to explain.
it's no where mentioned as a "finding" ( finding is applicable if something is found out of a research, survey etc..)
(C) It is an explanation that the argument concludes is correct.
the argument concludes is right opposite to the bold faced sentence,rather it is just "blame" which the hunters think that people blame them ...
(D) It provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument.
it's not at all supporting the main conclusion.Also, it's not an evidence.
(E) It introduces a judgment that the argument opposes
correct. As "it "(boldface) is a matter which is introduced by the hunters .It states that people blame them for the decline in Deer population.Also, the hunter is concluding a different reason for that.
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 285
Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 158 [2] , given: 75

Re: Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2013, 10:31
2
KUDOS
perfectstranger wrote:
Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in Greenrock National Forest's deer population over the past ten years. Yet clearly, black bears have also played an important role in this decline. In the past ten years, the forest's protected black bear population has risen sharply, and examination of black bears found dead in the forest during the deer hunting season showed that a number of them had recently fed on deer.
In the hunter's argument, the portion in boldface plays which of the following roles?
(A) It is the main conclusion of the argument.
(B) It is a finding that the argument seeks to explain. No
(C) It is an explanation that the argument concludes is correct.
(D) It provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument.
(E) It introduces a judgment that the argument opposes

Conclusion starts with Yet which indicate opposition / contradiction to the previous premise i.e. bold faced
_________________

YOU CAN, IF YOU THINK YOU CAN

Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2012
Posts: 77
Location: United States
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 137

Re: Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Mar 2013, 12:27

The author doesn't completely oppose the bold face statement in his conclusion - "Yet clearly, black bears have also played an important role in this decline".

Does someone care to explain?

thanks
_________________

If my post has contributed to your learning or teaching in any way, feel free to hit the kudos button ^_^

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10362
Followers: 1000

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Re: Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 May 2014, 22:19
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Director
Status: Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Posts: 612
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 750 Q51 V41
GMAT 3: 790 Q51 V49
GPA: 3.3
Followers: 78

Kudos [?]: 498 [0], given: 298

Re: Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 May 2014, 22:20
Yet is a trigger word for contradiction. Thanks!
_________________

Like my post Send me a Kudos It is a Good manner.
My Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-score-750-and-750-i-moved-from-710-to-189016.html

Director
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 597
Location: Germany
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 580 Q46 V24
GPA: 3.88
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 356 [0], given: 200

Re: Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Feb 2015, 02:36
Hi, , it was a good question, but I don't really think that the difficulty level was correctly assigned here --> 600-700 Level in my opinion.
Bold Face questions are appear usually in level 600-700 and above.
_________________

When you’re up, your friends know who you are. When you’re down, you know who your friends are.

800Score ONLY QUANT CAT1 51, CAT2 50, CAT3 50
GMAT PREP 670
MGMAT CAT 630
KAPLAN CAT 660

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10362
Followers: 1000

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Re: Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Feb 2016, 06:40
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 54
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 43

Re: Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2017, 23:25
Hi Experts,
I have a couple of Qs for this argument:
a. Clarification in identifying main conclusion.
b. Is second part of (B) ie argument seeks to explain is correct?

Presenting my understanding:

Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in Greenrock
National Forest???s deer population over the past ten years.

Here, hunter is the author of argument and the BF is belief of people.

Yet clearly, black bears have also played an important role in this decline.

Is this main conclusion since till now we were discussing people's belief but now, we are reading hunter's view?

In the past ten years, the forest???s protected black bear population has risen sharply, and examination of black bears found dead in the forest during the deer hunting season showed that a number of them had recently fed on deer.

This is an evidence to support earlier statement by hunter.

If I interpret correctly, yet clearly ??? is hunter???s opinion and hence becomes main conclusion in spite of first BF 1 i.e what people believe in ???.. Between third party (people) and author (hunter) author???s view is treated as main conclusion. What if no comments are made by author? Should one consider third party belief / claim as main conclusion?
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 495
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Followers: 154

Kudos [?]: 377 [1] , given: 191

Re: Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 May 2017, 13:17
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
Top Contributor
Quote:
Hi Experts,
I have a couple of Qs for this argument:
a. Clarification in identifying main conclusion.
b. Is second part of (B) ie argument seeks to explain is correct?

Presenting my understanding:

Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in Greenrock
National Forest???s deer population over the past ten years.

Here, hunter is the author of argument and the BF is belief of people.

Yet clearly, black bears have also played an important role in this decline.

Is this main conclusion since till now we were discussing people's belief but now, we are reading hunter's view?

In the past ten years, the forest???s protected black bear population has risen sharply, and examination of black bears found dead in the forest during the deer hunting season showed that a number of them had recently fed on deer.

This is an evidence to support earlier statement by hunter.

If I interpret correctly, yet clearly ??? is hunter???s opinion and hence becomes main conclusion in spite of first BF 1 i.e what people believe in ???.. Between third party (people) and author (hunter) author???s view is treated as main conclusion. What if no comments are made by author? Should one consider third party belief / claim as main conclusion?

Yes, the main conclusion is that "black bears have also played an important role in [the decline in GNF's deer population]". The use of the word "also" implies that the author agrees that hunters have played a role in the decline. However, unlike "many people", the author does not blame hunters alone.

This conclusion a bit tricky to see because it follows a contrasting statement. If the first sentence were removed, the author could have said, "In addition to hunters, black bears have also played an important role in the decline in GNF's deer population," and the conclusion would be the same. The first sentence simply states the belief of many people, a belief that the author's argument opposes. The last sentence provides evidence to support the author's conclusion. Thus, choice E is correct.
Quote:
(B) It is a finding that the argument seeks to explain.

As for choice B, the author only presents the belief in the first sentence and does seek to explain it.
_________________

www.gmatninja.com + blog

Join us for the verbal experts' live chat every Wednesday, 8 am PST/8:30 pm IST! Details available here.

Rules for posting in verbal forum | How to use search function (before posting questions!)

GMAT Club's ultimate verbal study plan, 2017 edition

Re: Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in   [#permalink] 08 May 2017, 13:17
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Pundit: Many people blame the construction of retail locations 6 19 Jul 2016, 02:35
Treasure Hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found 0 21 Jul 2014, 08:55
15 Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found 13 10 Apr 2017, 16:44
16 In a certain state, hunting permits require the hunter to be 11 04 Sep 2016, 00:07
8 Hunter: Hunters alone are blamed for the decline in 21 19 Aug 2016, 09:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by