Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 04:13 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 04:13

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Current Student
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Status:He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Going to Business School -- Corruptus in Extremis
Posts: 1734
Own Kudos [?]: 5734 [16]
Given Kudos: 3054
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Mar 2018
Posts: 32
Own Kudos [?]: 28 [0]
Given Kudos: 97
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Apr 2019
Posts: 22
Own Kudos [?]: 27 [0]
Given Kudos: 39
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Jan 2020
Posts: 69
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 304
GMAT 1: 730 Q43 V42
Send PM
Re: I. Room air conditioners produced by Japanese manufacturers tend to be [#permalink]
(B) Production facilities of firms designated as United States manufacturers are not all located in the United States


For the 7% of people picking B.

hypothetically, according to this answer, the production facility that produces US air conditioners "outside the US" could be in Japan, which would not resolve the paradox because they would be from the same place.
CEO
CEO
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 2552
Own Kudos [?]: 1813 [0]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: I. Room air conditioners produced by Japanese manufacturers tend to be [#permalink]
I. Room air conditioners produced by Japanese manufacturers tend to be more reliable than those produced by United States manufacturers.

II. The average lifetime of room air conditioners produced by United States manufacturers is about fifteen years, the same as that of room air conditioners produced by Japanese manufacturers.

Which one of the following, if true, would best reconcile the two statements above?

(A) Reliability is a measure of how long a product functions without needing repair - CORRECT. This is required to understand the reason behind better reliability of Japanese manufactured room ACs, but, it is not without the assumption that US manufactured ones require more numbers of repair, which we can't conclude from the given argument.

(B) Production facilities of firms designated as United States manufacturers are not all located in the United States - WRONG. Not sure if they are located in Japan, but even if they are, the comparison is between ones that are manufactured by US manufacturers and those that are manufactured by Japanese. However, what if some are located at places other than Japan and US. More importantly how ACs by Japanese manufacturers are more reliable than ACs by US manufacturers. This one does not helps but looks so at first read.

(C) Damage to room air conditioners during shipping and installation does not occur with great frequency in the United States or in Japan - WRONG. Nothing's there.

(D) Room air conditioners have been manufactured for a longer time in the United States than in Japan - WRONG. This makes us believe that even after with more experience in manufacturing US manufacturers' ACs have only 15 years of average lifetime. This makes us think that US ACs are not that reliable but a longer experience doesn't guarantee better reliability - it can be a business function also.

(E) Japanese manufacturers often use more reliable components in their room air conditioners than do United States manufacturers - WRONG. A deceiver for a correct answer.

A is not fully acceptable as i see it.

Answer A.
LBS Moderator
Joined: 30 Oct 2019
Posts: 836
Own Kudos [?]: 775 [0]
Given Kudos: 1577
Send PM
Re: I. Room air conditioners produced by Japanese manufacturers tend to be [#permalink]
unraveled wrote:
I. Room air conditioners produced by Japanese manufacturers tend to be more reliable than those produced by United States manufacturers.

II. The average lifetime of room air conditioners produced by United States manufacturers is about fifteen years, the same as that of room air conditioners produced by Japanese manufacturers.

Which one of the following, if true, would best reconcile the two statements above?

(A) Reliability is a measure of how long a product functions without needing repair - CORRECT. This is required to understand the reason behind better reliability of Japanese manufactured room ACs, but, it is not without the assumption that US manufactured ones require more numbers of repair, which we can't conclude from the given argument.

(B) Production facilities of firms designated as United States manufacturers are not all located in the United States - WRONG. Not sure if they are located in Japan, but even if they are, the comparison is between ones that are manufactured by US manufacturers and those that are manufactured by Japanese. However, what if some are located at places other than Japan and US. More importantly how ACs by Japanese manufacturers are more reliable than ACs by US manufacturers. This one does not helps but looks so at first read.

(C) Damage to room air conditioners during shipping and installation does not occur with great frequency in the United States or in Japan - WRONG. Nothing's there.

(D) Room air conditioners have been manufactured for a longer time in the United States than in Japan - WRONG. This makes us believe that even after with more experience in manufacturing US manufacturers' ACs have only 15 years of average lifetime. This makes us think that US ACs are not that reliable but a longer experience doesn't guarantee better reliability - it can be a business function also.

(E) Japanese manufacturers often use more reliable components in their room air conditioners than do United States manufacturers - WRONG. A deceiver for a correct answer.

A is not fully acceptable as i see it.

Answer A.

No such assumptions are needed to be made.

Statements say although life of both products are the same, why is the Japanese product considered more reliable?
Option A answers this by saying reliability depends on how many repairs the product needs during its lifetime and not just how long the life of the product is.

Posted from my mobile device
CEO
CEO
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 2552
Own Kudos [?]: 1813 [0]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: I. Room air conditioners produced by Japanese manufacturers tend to be [#permalink]
AnirudhaS wrote:
unraveled wrote:
I. Room air conditioners produced by Japanese manufacturers tend to be more reliable than those produced by United States manufacturers.

II. The average lifetime of room air conditioners produced by United States manufacturers is about fifteen years, the same as that of room air conditioners produced by Japanese manufacturers.

Which one of the following, if true, would best reconcile the two statements above?

(A) Reliability is a measure of how long a product functions without needing repair - CORRECT. This is required to understand the reason behind better reliability of Japanese manufactured room ACs, but, it is not without the assumption that US manufactured ones require more numbers of repair, which we can't conclude from the given argument.

(B) Production facilities of firms designated as United States manufacturers are not all located in the United States - WRONG. Not sure if they are located in Japan, but even if they are, the comparison is between ones that are manufactured by US manufacturers and those that are manufactured by Japanese. However, what if some are located at places other than Japan and US. More importantly how ACs by Japanese manufacturers are more reliable than ACs by US manufacturers. This one does not helps but looks so at first read.

(C) Damage to room air conditioners during shipping and installation does not occur with great frequency in the United States or in Japan - WRONG. Nothing's there.

(D) Room air conditioners have been manufactured for a longer time in the United States than in Japan - WRONG. This makes us believe that even after with more experience in manufacturing US manufacturers' ACs have only 15 years of average lifetime. This makes us think that US ACs are not that reliable but a longer experience doesn't guarantee better reliability - it can be a business function also.

(E) Japanese manufacturers often use more reliable components in their room air conditioners than do United States manufacturers - WRONG. A deceiver for a correct answer.

A is not fully acceptable as i see it.

Answer A.

No such assumptions are needed to be made.

Statements say although life of both products are the same, why is the Japanese product considered more reliable?
Option A answers this by saying reliability depends on how many repairs the product needs during its lifetime and not just how long the life of the product is.

Posted from my mobile device

Whether an assumption or an inference has to be made, it is sure that one of them is require for A to be correct. I might be wrong to say it as an assumption but that's the necessary requirement here.

Otherwise the argument is no big deal and i guess POE is better an approach in this case.
LBS Moderator
Joined: 30 Oct 2019
Posts: 836
Own Kudos [?]: 775 [0]
Given Kudos: 1577
Send PM
Re: I. Room air conditioners produced by Japanese manufacturers tend to be [#permalink]
unraveled wrote:
AnirudhaS wrote:
unraveled wrote:
I. Room air conditioners produced by Japanese manufacturers tend to be more reliable than those produced by United States manufacturers.

II. The average lifetime of room air conditioners produced by United States manufacturers is about fifteen years, the same as that of room air conditioners produced by Japanese manufacturers.

Which one of the following, if true, would best reconcile the two statements above?

(A) Reliability is a measure of how long a product functions without needing repair - CORRECT. This is required to understand the reason behind better reliability of Japanese manufactured room ACs, but, it is not without the assumption that US manufactured ones require more numbers of repair, which we can't conclude from the given argument.

(B) Production facilities of firms designated as United States manufacturers are not all located in the United States - WRONG. Not sure if they are located in Japan, but even if they are, the comparison is between ones that are manufactured by US manufacturers and those that are manufactured by Japanese. However, what if some are located at places other than Japan and US. More importantly how ACs by Japanese manufacturers are more reliable than ACs by US manufacturers. This one does not helps but looks so at first read.

(C) Damage to room air conditioners during shipping and installation does not occur with great frequency in the United States or in Japan - WRONG. Nothing's there.

(D) Room air conditioners have been manufactured for a longer time in the United States than in Japan - WRONG. This makes us believe that even after with more experience in manufacturing US manufacturers' ACs have only 15 years of average lifetime. This makes us think that US ACs are not that reliable but a longer experience doesn't guarantee better reliability - it can be a business function also.

(E) Japanese manufacturers often use more reliable components in their room air conditioners than do United States manufacturers - WRONG. A deceiver for a correct answer.

A is not fully acceptable as i see it.

Answer A.

No such assumptions are needed to be made.

Statements say although life of both products are the same, why is the Japanese product considered more reliable?
Option A answers this by saying reliability depends on how many repairs the product needs during its lifetime and not just how long the life of the product is.

Posted from my mobile device

Whether an assumption or an inference has to be made, it is sure that one of them is require for A to be correct. I might be wrong to say it as an assumption but that's the necessary requirement here.

Otherwise the argument is no big deal and i guess POE is better an approach in this case.


Option A says Reliability--> no. of repairs
And the question type is "resolve the paradox"
This does help resolve the paradox right? The option NEVER says that no. of repairs (US) < no. of repairs (Japan).
We are very well in our right to choose no. of repairs (US) > (Japan) as this resolves the paradox.
I see no fault with this question.
CEO
CEO
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 2552
Own Kudos [?]: 1813 [0]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: I. Room air conditioners produced by Japanese manufacturers tend to be [#permalink]
AnirudhaS wrote:
unraveled wrote:
AnirudhaS wrote:
No such assumptions are needed to be made.

Statements say although life of both products are the same, why is the Japanese product considered more reliable?
Option A answers this by saying reliability depends on how many repairs the product needs during its lifetime and not just how long the life of the product is.

Posted from my mobile device

Whether an assumption or an inference has to be made, it is sure that one of them is require for A to be correct. I might be wrong to say it as an assumption but that's the necessary requirement here.

Otherwise the argument is no big deal and i guess POE is better an approach in this case.


Option A says Reliability--> no. of repairs
And the question type is "resolve the paradox"
This does help resolve the paradox right? The option NEVER says that no. of repairs (US) < no. of repairs (Japan).
We are very well in our right to choose no. of repairs (US) > (Japan) as this resolves the paradox.

I see no fault with this question.

Certainly we can't find faults with official questions.
But don't you think if number of repairs are more for Japanese manufacturer then it raises questions whether Japanese ACs are reliable.
The highlighted text, as you said, would only make things complex, not resolve.

I would have liked option A more had it mentioned that repairs are the only measure to know reliability.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17210
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: I. Room air conditioners produced by Japanese manufacturers tend to be [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: I. Room air conditioners produced by Japanese manufacturers tend to be [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne