It is currently 14 Dec 2017, 07:21

# Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Wharton R1 | Stanford R1 | Tuck R1 | Ross R1 | Haas R1

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# I was curious if the word 'BECUASE' can ever be used to

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 31 Aug 2010
Posts: 41

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 2

I was curious if the word 'BECUASE' can ever be used to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2010, 19:41
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

40% (00:58) correct 60% (00:00) wrong based on 7 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

I was curious if the word 'BECUASE' can ever be used to signal a CONCLUSION in a CR passage. I have come across an instance where this might be the case. However in the MGMAT CR guide the word 'BECUASE' is listed only as a common PREMISE signal. I can post the question I am referring to but I wanted to know the general thoughts first. . . Thanks

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 2

Intern
Joined: 31 Aug 2010
Posts: 41

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 2

Re: Conclusion Signals in CR questions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2010, 10:33
Businesses are suffering because of a lack of money available for development loans. To help businesses, thegovernment plans to modify the income-tax structure in order to induce individual taxpayers to put a largerportion of their incomes into retirement savings accounts, because as more money is deposited in suchaccounts, more money becomes available to borrowers.

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt regarding the effectiveness of the government'splan to increase the amount of money available for development loans for businesses?

(A) When levels of personal retirement savings increase, consumer borrowing always increasescorrespondingly.

(B) The increased tax revenue the government would receive as a result of business expansion would notoffset the loss in revenue from personal income taxes during the first year of the plan.

(C) Even with tax incentives, some people will choose not to increase their levels of retirement savings.

(D) Bankers generally will not continue to lend money to businesses whose prospective earnings areinsufficient to meet their loan repayment schedules.

(E) The modified tax structure would give all taxpayers, regardless of their incomes, the same tax savings fora given increase in their retirement savings.

Posted from my mobile device

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 2

Intern
Joined: 31 Aug 2010
Posts: 41

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 2

Re: Conclusion Signals in CR questions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2010, 18:07
any thoughts????

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 2

Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 270

Kudos [?]: 244 [0], given: 2

Re: Conclusion Signals in CR questions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2010, 19:23
Is it E.
_________________

Trying hard to achieve something unachievable now....

Kudos [?]: 244 [0], given: 2

Intern
Joined: 31 Aug 2010
Posts: 41

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 2

Re: Conclusion Signals in CR questions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Nov 2010, 03:53
No it is not E. My original question is more about the recognition of conclusions rather than trying to determine the answer

Posted from my mobile device

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 2

Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 184

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 7

Schools: MBA, Thunderbird School of Global Management / BA, Wesleyan University
Re: Conclusion Signals in CR questions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Nov 2010, 14:22
Good question. "Because" indicates a rationale and thus a premise, not a conclusion:

"The Dodgers will win BECAUSE they have better players." --> "They have better players" is a premise.
"BECAUSE you are my friend, I will loan you five dollars." --> "You are my friend" is a premise.

You could have the following:

"My sister hates cheese and tomatoes. Because of that, she probably won't like pizza."

Here, the conclusion is that my sister won't like pizza (even though that sentence starts with "because.") This is acceptable because "because of that" refers to the premise in the prior sentence and "she probably won't like pizza" is an independent clause that follows.

That help?

Brett
_________________

Brett Beach-Kimball | Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 7

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4321

Kudos [?]: 8338 [0], given: 366

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Conclusion Signals in CR questions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Nov 2010, 08:14
Here ‘because more money is available’ is rather a premise and not part of the conclusion per se; the conclusion will be “(therefore) more money becomes available to borrowers.” The conclusion -marker “therefore” has been intentionally dropped to befuddle the test taker.

Incidentally, for those interested, the answer must be A, which directly addresses tax savings schemes and implies that the money available to businesses may not go up after all
_________________

Can you solve at least some SC questions without delving into the initial statement?

Narendran 98845 44509

Kudos [?]: 8338 [0], given: 366

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 253

Kudos [?]: 606 [0], given: 32

Re: Conclusion Signals in CR questions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Nov 2010, 10:03
Hey jscott,

Great question - on Strengthen/Weaken questions you want to first identify the conclusion that you're supporting/attacking, so please do make that an emphasis. The four common ways to determine a conclusion are to look for:

1) Conclusion language like “thus” or “therefore”

2) A call for action, such as “we should…” or “they must…”

3) The effect of a cause-and-effect relationship. For example, “Because it is raining, the parade will be canceled.” The parade being canceled is a conclusion dependent on the rain.

4) The “Why” test. The “Why” test dictates that CR arguments are comprised of only two things: facts and conclusions. And conclusions need to be based on facts. If you ask “why is that true” of a statement, and realize that the paragraph gives no attempt at a reason for it, that statement must be given as a fact – no reason is necessary. But if a reason is given – if you can point to another sentence after asking “why,” then the statement that depends on another is likely the conclusion.

If you want to break this process down with an example, I recommend this blog post: http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2010/11/gmat-tip-of-the-week-jump-to-conclusions/

Now, on this question, it's actually not a straight Weaken question - this is one that involves a plan or strategy. On Plan/Strategy questions, the "objective" is the "conclusion" - your job isn't to weaken an argument, but rather to demonstrate that the government's plan won't likely reach its objective.

So here, you'd want to use "to help businesses (who are hamstrung by a lack of available loan money)" as the "conclusion". The government aims to do that by cutting personal taxes so that people invest more and that money becomes available. As daagh notes, A weakens that plan by showing that individual consumers will borrow that increase in available loan funding, meaning that the plan won't actually increase the pool available "to help businesses".
_________________

Brian

Save \$100 on live Veritas Prep GMAT Courses and Admissions Consulting

Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 606 [0], given: 32

Re: Conclusion Signals in CR questions   [#permalink] 30 Nov 2010, 10:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# I was curious if the word 'BECUASE' can ever be used to

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.