It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 07:47

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Verbal Expert
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3157

Kudos [?]: 3303 [1], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Aug 2016, 12:32
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
manhasnoname wrote:
Can someone answer why D & E aren't parallel? Can't the article "a" be distributed to all items in a list? To maintain parallelism in the "either...or..." stem article should be present.


Distribution of article is not the issue in D - in authentic sources, such distribution has been used.

The problem of parallelism in D and E lies elsewhere. Because of use of "not", the idiom "not X but Y" comes into effect, and thus there arises a violation of parallelism.
not + verb (generate) requires but (rather) + verb to maintain parallelism.

Kudos [?]: 3303 [1], given: 22

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 18 Nov 2016
Posts: 51

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 136

Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Aug 2017, 07:24
rohitgoel15 wrote:
If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it would generate not a blast, shock, nor heat, but an intense electromagnetic pulse disrupting, like a lightning bolt, all unshielded electric lines and electronic equipment.

c. A nuclear weapon detonated above the atmosphere would generate no blast, shock, or heat, but rather


Can someone explain the comma between "heat" and "but rather"? Thanks!!

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 136

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 01 Jun 2015
Posts: 164

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 101

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V26
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Aug 2017, 11:37
I have a question regarding the use of but rather. rather is an adverb and here it seems to modify the noun phrase.So my question is"Don't we just need a but instead of but rather?"

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 101

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 18 Nov 2016
Posts: 51

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 136

If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2017, 18:11
rohitgoel15 wrote:
If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it would generate not a blast, shock, nor heat, but an intense electromagnetic pulse disrupting, like a lightning bolt, all unshielded electric lines and electronic equipment.

c. A nuclear weapon detonated above the atmosphere would generate no blast, shock, or heat, but rather


Could someone explain this comma to me? It's such a little thing, but I'm not sure what it's doing there since "an intense electromagnetic pulse disrupting, like a lightning bolt, all unshielded electric lines and electronic equipment" definitely isn't an independent clause.

I have the same confusion about a similar ellipsis question:

Quote:
Until 2010, a state tax regulation known as the "80-20 rule required that condominium associations receive at least 80 percent of their gross income from their tenant-shareholders, and no more than 20 percent from other sources, like ground-floor rent for restaurants.


Sorry for being a pest and posting twice, but all the study advice says so stay persistent and follow every source of confusion until you fully understand the material. How I feel about commas right now: :x How I'll feel once I've got this sorted: :-) :grin: 8-)

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 136

Expert Post
Verbal Expert
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3157

Kudos [?]: 3303 [0], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2017, 06:33
NicoleJaneway wrote:
rohitgoel15 wrote:
If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it would generate not a blast, shock, nor heat, but an intense electromagnetic pulse disrupting, like a lightning bolt, all unshielded electric lines and electronic equipment.

c. A nuclear weapon detonated above the atmosphere would generate no blast, shock, or heat, but rather


Could someone explain this comma to me? It's such a little thing, but I'm not sure what it's doing there since "an intense electromagnetic pulse disrupting, like a lightning bolt, all unshielded electric lines and electronic equipment" definitely isn't an independent clause.

I have the same confusion about a similar ellipsis question:

Quote:
Until 2010, a state tax regulation known as the "80-20 rule required that condominium associations receive at least 80 percent of their gross income from their tenant-shareholders, and no more than 20 percent from other sources, like ground-floor rent for restaurants.


Sorry for being a pest and posting twice, but all the study advice says so stay persistent and follow every source of confusion until you fully understand the material. How I feel about commas right now: :x How I'll feel once I've got this sorted: :-) :grin: 8-)


Consider the following uses:

1 a. Use of "but" to join two clauses:
I can read, but I cannot write. ( comma must be included.)

1 b. Use of "but" to join two items that are not clauses (e.g. two verbs).
I can read but cannot write. ( comma must be eliminated.)

2. Use of "but" as a part of idiom "not X, BUT Y".
What I saw was not a child, but a man. ( comma is required.)

The usage of "comma" in option C is similar to the usage 2 above (idiom).

Kudos [?]: 3303 [0], given: 22

Expert Post
Verbal Expert
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3157

Kudos [?]: 3303 [0], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2017, 06:36
techiesam wrote:
I have a question regarding the use of but rather. rather is an adverb and here it seems to modify the noun phrase.So my question is"Don't we just need a but instead of but rather?"


"But" and "but rather" would both be gramatically correct. "But rather" is more emphatic than just "but".

Kudos [?]: 3303 [0], given: 22

Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the   [#permalink] 29 Aug 2017, 06:36

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 26 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.