It is currently 21 Nov 2017, 21:25

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 303

Kudos [?]: 697 [1], given: 20

If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2010, 22:20
1
This post received
KUDOS
12
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

28% (01:06) correct 72% (01:05) wrong based on 345 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it would generate not a blast, shock, nor heat, but an intense electromagnetic pulse disrupting, like a lightning bolt, all unshielded electric lines and electronic equipment.

a. If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it would generate not a blast, shock, nor heat, but
b. If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it would not generate a blast, shock, or heat, but rather
c. A nuclear weapon detonated above the atmosphere would generate no blast, shock, or heat, but rather
d. A nuclear weapon detonated above the atmosphere would not generate a blast, shock, or heat, but rather
e. A nuclear weapon detonated above the atmosphere would not generate a blast, shock, nor heat, but
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 697 [1], given: 20

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 190

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 29

Re: nuclear weapon [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2010, 22:41
not sure why its C, i thought D would work as well.... any suggestions?

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 29

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 793

Kudos [?]: 1211 [0], given: 25

Location: London
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: nuclear weapon [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2010, 22:46
no blast, shock, or heat
v/s
a blast, shock, or heat

The second list doesnt seem parallel.
_________________

Math write-ups
1) Algebra-101 2) Sequences 3) Set combinatorics 4) 3-D geometry

My GMAT story

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1211 [0], given: 25

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: I wish!
Joined: 21 May 2010
Posts: 784

Kudos [?]: 484 [0], given: 33

Re: nuclear weapon [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2010, 23:21
I also believe the answer should be D. Option C is not parallel also seems to changing the meaning of sentence!
_________________

http://drambedkarbooks.com/

Kudos [?]: 484 [0], given: 33

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Sep 2010
Posts: 30

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 1

Re: nuclear weapon [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Sep 2010, 00:36
i went with option E
as i think But and rahter are redundant.
we should use 1 of them.
kindly give the official explaination and answer.

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 1

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Mesmerized
Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 172

Kudos [?]: 128 [0], given: 12

Location: UAE, Dubai
Re: nuclear weapon [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Sep 2010, 04:27
it cant be D, there is no parallelism, after "but" is a noun, so we need a noun after ""NOT'" instead we have a verb "GENERATED"
I was down between A or C, I know C is the OA but why A is wrong?
_________________

Nanquam Fractum

Kudos [?]: 128 [0], given: 12

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 793

Kudos [?]: 1211 [0], given: 25

Location: London
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: nuclear weapon [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Sep 2010, 05:12
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
elevinty wrote:
it cant be D, there is no parallelism, after "but" is a noun, so we need a noun after ""NOT'" instead we have a verb "GENERATED"
I was down between A or C, I know C is the OA but why A is wrong?


not X,Y, nor Z ... doesnt sound right
_________________

Math write-ups
1) Algebra-101 2) Sequences 3) Set combinatorics 4) 3-D geometry

My GMAT story

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1211 [0], given: 25

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 448

Kudos [?]: 112 [1], given: 10

Re: nuclear weapon [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Sep 2010, 06:03
1
This post received
KUDOS
this one's a bit tricky ....

C and D look very similar, don't they?
In C, we're using "no" and a noun;
In D, we're using "not" and a verb.

"not... but..." is a conjunction and therefore requires parallel structure. So in D, after "not" we have "generate," a verb, and after "but" we have "pulse," a noun.
where as we need a verb.

So we can rule out D.
_________________

GGG (Gym / GMAT / Girl) -- Be Serious

Its your duty to post OA afterwards; some one must be waiting for that...

Kudos [?]: 112 [1], given: 10

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1471

Kudos [?]: 791 [0], given: 6

Re: nuclear weapon [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Sep 2010, 07:26
good question. fell for E but agree with C and reasoning above.

Kudos [?]: 791 [0], given: 6

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 300

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 20

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V46
GPA: 3.2
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: nuclear weapon [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Sep 2010, 07:42
a. If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it would generate not a blast, shock, nor heat, but
- nor is wrong
b. If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it would not generate a blast, shock, or heat, but rather
- not parallel
c. A nuclear weapon detonated above the atmosphere would generate no blast, shock, or heat, but rather
d. A nuclear weapon detonated above the atmosphere would not generate a blast, shock, or heat, but rather
- not parallel
e. A nuclear weapon detonated above the atmosphere would not generate a blast, shock, nor heat, but
- not parallel

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 20

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Will Retake GMAT
Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Posts: 129

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 28

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Stanford '13 (D)
GPA: 3.11
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: nuclear weapon [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Sep 2010, 07:53
Got confused with B initially....but its definitely C
_________________

Re-taking GMAT. Hope the charm works this time.. :)

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 28

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Mesmerized
Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 172

Kudos [?]: 128 [0], given: 12

Location: UAE, Dubai
Re: nuclear weapon [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Sep 2010, 15:14
here is my thoughts about A and anyone is welcome to debate:
1)NOR is wrong not because it doesn't sound right ( nor by it self can actually complete a list of negative statements but with grammatical restrictions ) but because it's followed by an adjective and just an adjective, it's wrong
2) the usage of "if" structure: the presence of "would" indicate that the statement is out of the ordinary and hypothetical, which is not the case here, because the description in the sentence can actually happen.
PS: I was surprised that no one mentioned A, to me D was never a confusion.
_________________

Nanquam Fractum

Kudos [?]: 128 [0], given: 12

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Posts: 146

Kudos [?]: 124 [0], given: 37

Re: nuclear weapon [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Sep 2010, 16:59
This is quite tricky....
I fell for D...But accept the reasoning for C.
_________________

Thanks,
VP

Kudos [?]: 124 [0], given: 37

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 181

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 11

Re: nuclear weapon [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Sep 2010, 23:04
Good question....
the choice is between would generate no blast, shock, or heat, but rather and would not generate a blast, shock, or heat, but rather

for this we need to take a look at what is after rather...is it a verb or a noun. If noun then the first one wins
if a verb then the second one wins.

intense electromagnetic pulse this is noun.
so to make things || we need a noun in the earlier clause.
So the sentence becomes ... would generate no blast ..... but ...(generate) intense electromagnetic .....

C wins

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 11

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Aug 2010
Posts: 75

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 9

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: nuclear weapon [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Sep 2010, 21:33
I chose D. I see the point with C - a blast, shock or heat --> a heat????

generate [no] blast, shock or heat --> now i am not convinced if generate blast sounds fine.

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 9

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Aug 2010
Posts: 218

Kudos [?]: 230 [0], given: 5

Location: Boston
Re: nuclear weapon [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Oct 2010, 04:38
BlitzHN wrote:
I chose D. I see the point with C - a blast, shock or heat --> a heat????

generate [no] blast, shock or heat --> now i am not convinced if generate blast sounds fine.


"Generate blast" would be wrong, but "generate NO blast" is fine.

Kudos [?]: 230 [0], given: 5

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2010
Posts: 192

Kudos [?]: 127 [0], given: 13

Re: nuclear weapon [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Oct 2010, 06:24
I made a mistake.
it is a really good problem.

Kudos [?]: 127 [0], given: 13

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10127

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2016, 01:31
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4311

Kudos [?]: 8183 [0], given: 364

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2016, 03:36
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Quote:
If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it would generate not a blast, shock, nor heat, but an intense electromagnetic pulse disrupting, like a lightning bolt, all unshielded electric lines and electronic equipment.

a. If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it would generate not a blast, shock, nor heat, but -----not and nor make the clause a double negative. It should be ‘neither …nor’ or ‘not … or’

b. If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it would not generate a blast, shock, or heat, but rather – though accepted sometimes as good enough when extant alone, ‘not … but rather’ is still inferior to ‘not…. but’ because it is wordier. When both the forms of the idiom are available simple ‘not… but’ makes a better choice.

c. A nuclear weapon detonated above the atmosphere would generate no blast, shock, or heat, but rather ---- the same reasoning as in B. While the left of the conjunction but has no article, the right has an article in the form of an intense electromagnetic. Though not very significant, still it is a pin - prick.

d. A nuclear weapon detonated above the atmosphere would not generate a blast, shock, or heat, but rather --- not generate … but rather an intense ‘misses the correlative parallelism

e. A nuclear weapon detonated above the atmosphere would not generate a blast, shock, nor heat, but ------ the same problem as in D.

Not happy with any of the choices.
_________________

Can you solve at least some SC questions without delving into the initial statement?

Narendran 98845 44509

Kudos [?]: 8183 [0], given: 364

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 21 Apr 2016
Posts: 197

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 79

GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Aug 2016, 18:57
Can someone answer why D & E aren't parallel? Can't the article "a" be distributed to all items in a list? To maintain parallelism in the "either...or..." stem article should be present.

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 79

Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the   [#permalink] 21 Aug 2016, 18:57

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 26 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.