Oct 18 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Learn an intuitive, systematic approach that will maximize your success on Fillintheblank GMAT CR Questions. Oct 19 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Does GMAT RC seem like an uphill battle? eGMAT is conducting a free webinar to help you learn reading strategies that can enable you to solve 700+ level RC questions with at least 90% accuracy in less than 10 days. Sat., Oct 19th at 7 am PDT Oct 20 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score. Oct 22 08:00 PM PDT  09:00 PM PDT On Demand for $79. For a score of 4951 (from current actual score of 40+) AllInOne Standard & 700+ Level Questions (150 questions)
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 8009
GPA: 3.82

Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Jan 2016, 22:45
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution. If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ? (1) b > 1 (2) ab + a/b > 0 Modify the original condition and the question and multiply b^2 on the both equations, which becomes ab^3>ab? > ab^3ab>0? >ab(b^21)>0?. There are 2 variables(a,b), which should match with the number of equations. So you need 2 equations. For 1) 1 equation, for 2) 1 equation, which is likely to make C the answer. When 1) &2), b>1 > b^2>1, ab and a/b get to have the same sign in 2). That is, ab>0 > a/b>0(this is divided by b^2 and as b^2 is a positive number, direction of the sign doesn’t change.) So, 2) becomes ab>0, which is yes and sufficient. Therefore, the answer is C. For cases where we need 2 more equations, such as original conditions with “2 variables”, or “3 variables and 1 equation”, or “4 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 70% chance that C is the answer, while E has 25% chance. These two are the majority. In case of common mistake type 3,4, the answer may be from A, B or D but there is only 5% chance. Since C is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition (It saves us time). Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, D or E.
_________________
MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spareThe oneandonly World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy. "Only $79 for 1 month Online Course""Free Resources30 day online access & Diagnostic Test""Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons  try it yourself"



Intern
Joined: 22 Oct 2015
Posts: 17

If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Jan 2016, 10:01
Bunuel wrote: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?
Is \(ab > \frac{a}{b}\)? > is \(ab  \frac{a}{b}>0\)? > \(\frac{a(b^21)}{b}>0\)? > \(\frac{a}{b}*(b^21)>0\)?
(1) b > 1 > both sides are nonnegative, thus we can square: \(b^2>1\) > \(b^21>0\). We need to know the sign of a/b. Not sufficient. (2) ab + a/b > 0. Notice that ab and a/b have the same sign. Both of them cannot be negative, because in this case their sum would also be negative, therefore both are positive: a/b > 0. We need to know the sign of b^21. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) \(b^21>0\) and \(\frac{a}{b} > 0\), thus their product \(\frac{a}{b}*(b^21)>0\). Sufficient.
Answer: C.
Hope it's clear. \(ab > \frac{a}{b}\) Could someone explain if instead of moving the a/b to the left side, we multiple by b on both sides? \(ab > \frac{a}{b}\) Multiple by b on both sides \(ab^2 > a\) Then divide by a \(b^2 > 1\) I assume this operation is not allowed, by can someone explain to me why? Could it be because we do not know the sign of b?



CEO
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2599
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.7
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)

Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Jan 2016, 10:13
ZaydenBond wrote:
Could someone explain if instead of moving the a/b to the left side, we multiple by b on both sides?
\(ab > \frac{a}{b}\) Multiple by b on both sides \(ab^2 > a\) Then divide by a \(b^2 > 1\)
I assume this operation is not allowed, by can someone explain to me why? Could it be because we do not know the sign of b? Its because of the most important rule in inequalities. You need to reverse the sign of the inequality when you multiple by a negative quantity. In the question at hand, you do not know whether b>0. If it is, then yes you can multiply the inequality by 'b' but if b<0 then you must reverse the sign of inequalilty. You can also remember this rule by the following example. You know 2>1 but what about 2 and 1? 2<1 or in the other words, when you are given 2>1 and you want to multiple throughout by 1, you get 2 < 1 (with reversed sign). This is the reason why it is much less time consuming to bring a/b to the other side than to multiply throughout by 'b' as you do not know the sign of 'b' Hope this helps.



Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1348
Location: Malaysia

Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Feb 2017, 17:49
gmatquant25 wrote: If \(ab ≠ 0\), is \(ab > \frac{a}{b}\)? (1) \(b > 1\) (2) \(ab + \frac{a}{b} > 0\) Solution from "Thursdays With Ron"
Attachments
Untitled.jpg [ 181.2 KiB  Viewed 1020 times ]
_________________
"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."Rules for posting in verbal forum  Please DO NOT post short answer in your post! Advanced Search : https://gmatclub.com/forum/advancedsearch/



Intern
Joined: 04 Mar 2019
Posts: 3

Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Mar 2019, 04:20
Bunuel wrote: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?
Is \(ab > \frac{a}{b}\)? > is \(ab  \frac{a}{b}>0\)? > \(\frac{a(b^21)}{b}>0\)? > \(\frac{a}{b}*(b^21)>0\)?
(1) b > 1 > both sides are nonnegative, thus we can square: \(b^2>1\) > \(b^21>0\). We need to know the sign of a/b. Not sufficient. (2) ab + a/b > 0. Notice that ab and a/b have the same sign. Both of them cannot be negative, because in this case their sum would also be negative, therefore both are positive: a/b > 0. We need to know the sign of b^21. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) \(b^21>0\) and \(\frac{a}{b} > 0\), thus their product \(\frac{a}{b}*(b^21)>0\). Sufficient.
Answer: C.
Hope it's clear. Hello Brunel, as far as I understand you can't multiply or divide by a variable unless you know it's sign. However, in the step I highlighted as red, it seems that you're multiplying ab by b, or is it something that I am missing?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58426

Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Mar 2019, 04:29
aprothes wrote: Bunuel wrote: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?
Is \(ab > \frac{a}{b}\)? > is \(ab  \frac{a}{b}>0\)? > \(\frac{a(b^21)}{b}>0\)? > \(\frac{a}{b}*(b^21)>0\)?
(1) b > 1 > both sides are nonnegative, thus we can square: \(b^2>1\) > \(b^21>0\). We need to know the sign of a/b. Not sufficient. (2) ab + a/b > 0. Notice that ab and a/b have the same sign. Both of them cannot be negative, because in this case their sum would also be negative, therefore both are positive: a/b > 0. We need to know the sign of b^21. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) \(b^21>0\) and \(\frac{a}{b} > 0\), thus their product \(\frac{a}{b}*(b^21)>0\). Sufficient.
Answer: C.
Hope it's clear. Hello Brunel, as far as I understand you can't multiply or divide by a variable unless you know it's sign. However, in the step I highlighted as red, it seems that you're multiplying ab by b, or is it something that I am missing? We are not multiplying the whole inequality. We are manipulating with the left hand side only.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 18 Feb 2018
Posts: 108

Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Jun 2019, 12:22
Bunuel wrote: GmatDestroyer2013 wrote: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?
Is ab > \frac{a}{b}? > is ab  \frac{a}{b}>0? > \frac{a(b^21)}{b}>0? > \frac{a}{b}*(b^21)>0?
(1) b > 1 > both sides are nonnegative, thus we can square: b^2>1 > b^21>0. We need to know the sign of a/b. Not sufficient.
(2) ab + a/b > 0. Notice that ab and a/b have the same sign. Both of them cannot be negative, because in this case their sum would also be negative, therefore both are positive: a/b > 0. We need to know the sign of b^21. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) b^21>0 and \frac{a}{b} > 0, thus their product \frac{a}{b}*(b^21)>0. Sufficient.
Hi bunuel,
I did not get the highlighted part of the solution. Can you please explain why both a and b cannot be negative. I think if we consider values of a and b = 2 and 3 respectively. ab + a/b will remain positive overall.
Thanks in advance for your help. Both ab and a/b cannot be negative, not a and b. BunuelCan you please explain the highlighted part in detail. From my understanding, even if both a and b are ve, the answer option would be C. THanks!



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58426

Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Jun 2019, 04:52
GittinGud wrote: Bunuel wrote: GmatDestroyer2013 wrote: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?
Is ab > \frac{a}{b}? > is ab  \frac{a}{b}>0? > \frac{a(b^21)}{b}>0? > \frac{a}{b}*(b^21)>0?
(1) b > 1 > both sides are nonnegative, thus we can square: b^2>1 > b^21>0. We need to know the sign of a/b. Not sufficient.
(2) ab + a/b > 0. Notice that ab and a/b have the same sign. Both of them cannot be negative, because in this case their sum would also be negative, therefore both are positive: a/b > 0. We need to know the sign of b^21. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) b^21>0 and \frac{a}{b} > 0, thus their product \frac{a}{b}*(b^21)>0. Sufficient.
Hi bunuel,
I did not get the highlighted part of the solution. Can you please explain why both a and b cannot be negative. I think if we consider values of a and b = 2 and 3 respectively. ab + a/b will remain positive overall.
Thanks in advance for your help. Both ab and a/b cannot be negative, not a and b. BunuelCan you please explain the highlighted part in detail. From my understanding, even if both a and b are ve, the answer option would be C. THanks! The point is that ab and a/b will have the same sign: either both are positive or both are negative. But if ab and a/b are negative, then their sum will also be negative, thus ab + a/b > 0 means that ab and a/b are both positive.
_________________




Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?
[#permalink]
30 Jun 2019, 04:52



Go to page
Previous
1 2
[ 28 posts ]



