Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

As you said Both a or c-b should be +ve or both should be -ve.

Let assume a= .1 its is a positive b = .1 c= .2

AB = .1*.1 = 0.01 AC = .1*.2 = 0.02

so ab< ac

In this case if a < 0 and a is -ve then b>c but if a<0 and +ve then C>b

So we are not pretty sure.. Again in the question it is not mentioned that a,b,c are integer

I think you are confused with notation: statement (1) says that \(a<0\), which means that \(a\) is negative, so it can not equal to 0.1 or any other non-negative value.
_________________

hi guys .... i am a beginner in prep for GMAT. I left mathematics a very very long ago ... i have a question regarding the problem...

the question itself says

ab < ac ............can't we subtract a from either side straight away which will yield ...

b < c directly from the stem itself. We have answer without any further condition. a could be anything but if ab<ac it has to as per my understanding b<c.

hi guys .... i am a beginner in prep for GMAT. I left mathematics a very very long ago ... i have a question regarding the problem...

the question itself says

ab < ac ............can't we subtract a from either side straight away which will yield ...

b < c directly from the stem itself. We have answer without any further condition. a could be anything but if ab<ac it has to as per my understanding b<c.

anyone can throw light on it ...?

I think you mean divide instead of subtract.

Never multiply or reduce (divide) inequality by an unknown (a variable) unless you are sure of its sign since you do not know whether you must flip the sign of the inequality.

So you can not divided (reduce) \(ab<ac\) by \(a\) and write \(b<c\) because you don't know whether \(a\) is positive or negative: if it's positive then you should write \(b<c\) but if its negative then you should flip the sign and write \(b>c\). Statement (1) says \(a<0\), so when reducing by \(a\) we should flip the sign and write \(b>c\).

Statement (1) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (2) by itself is not. Statement (2) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (1) by itself is not. Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question, even though NEITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient. EITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question. Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question, requiring more data pertaining to the problem.

I just have one issue with this problem: when I originally did it I tried picking numbers rather than just dividing by -a to get b > c. This is what I got:

(1) If a < 0, then perhaps a = -1. Then if b =3 and c=2, ab < ac and c > b. But if b = -2 and c = -3, ab < ac and b > c. I'm not finding any rules I'm missing in the problem, so my answer was C.. or E... Why is the above reasoning wrong?

Statement (1) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (2) by itself is not. Statement (2) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (1) by itself is not. Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question, even though NEITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient. EITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question. Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question, requiring more data pertaining to the problem.

I just have one issue with this problem: when I originally did it I tried picking numbers rather than just dividing by -a to get b > c. This is what I got:

(1) If a < 0, then perhaps a = -1. Then if b =3 and c=2, ab < ac and c > bBut if b = -2 and c = -3, ab < ac and b > c. I'm not finding any rules I'm missing in the problem, so my answer was C.. or E... Why is the above reasoning wrong?

Thanks...

Above c>b in yellow is incorrect. It is c<b becasue b =3 and c=2. Hence answer is A.
_________________

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What you do TODAY is important because you're exchanging a day of your life for it! -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statement (1) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (2) by itself is not. Statement (2) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (1) by itself is not. Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question, even though NEITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient. EITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question. Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question, requiring more data pertaining to the problem.

I just have one issue with this problem: when I originally did it I tried picking numbers rather than just dividing by -a to get b > c. This is what I got:

(1) If a < 0, then perhaps a = -1. Then if b =3 and c=2, ab < ac and c > b. But if b = -2 and c = -3, ab < ac and b > c. I'm not finding any rules I'm missing in the problem, so my answer was C.. or E... Why is the above reasoning wrong?

Thanks...

\(ab<ac\) can be rewritten as \(ab-ac<0\) or \(a(b-c)<0\), which means that \(a\) and \(b-c\) have opposite signs.

(1) \(a<0\) then necessarily \(b-c>0.\) Sufficient.

(2) \(c<0\) Obviously not sufficient, as we know nothing about \(b.\)

Answer A.
_________________

PhD in Applied Mathematics Love GMAT Quant questions and running.

I just have one issue with this problem: when I originally did it I tried picking numbers rather than just dividing by -a to get b > c. This is what I got:

(1) If a < 0, then perhaps a = -1. Then if b =3 and c=2, ab < ac and c > b. But if b = -2 and c = -3, ab < ac and b > c. I'm not finding any rules I'm missing in the problem, so my answer was C.. or E... Why is the above reasoning wrong?

Thanks...

Merging similar topics. Please refer to the solutions above.
_________________

Re: If ab<ac , which is greater b or c ? i. a<0 2. c<0 [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Nov 2012, 16:01

the difficulty level tag assigned to this question is 600-700, but that is a wide range, can some one try to put it in a narrower band, i.e. is it a 610-630 or 670-700 type question.

Re: If ab<ac , which is greater b or c ? i. a<0 2. c<0 [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Apr 2016, 10:47

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

There’s something in Pacific North West that you cannot find anywhere else. The atmosphere and scenic nature are next to none, with mountains on one side and ocean on...

This month I got selected by Stanford GSB to be included in “Best & Brightest, Class of 2017” by Poets & Quants. Besides feeling honored for being part of...

Joe Navarro is an ex FBI agent who was a founding member of the FBI’s Behavioural Analysis Program. He was a body language expert who he used his ability to successfully...