Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 15:51 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 15:51

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92900
Own Kudos [?]: 618809 [0]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Jan 2020
Posts: 77
Own Kudos [?]: 21 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: United States
Schools: Duke '22 (M$)
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.9
WE:Investment Banking (Other)
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 09 Aug 2017
Posts: 689
Own Kudos [?]: 415 [1]
Given Kudos: 778
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Posts: 368
Own Kudos [?]: 706 [0]
Given Kudos: 67
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: General Management
GPA: 3.9
Send PM
If Blankenship Enterprises has to switch suppliers in the middle of a [#permalink]
If Blankenship Enterprises has to switch suppliers in the middle of a large production run, the company will not show a profit for the year. Therefore, if Blankenship Enterprises in fact turns out to show no profit for the year, it will also turn out to be true that the company had to switch suppliers during a large production run.

The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds?


Weaken question

Pre-thinking

By deconstructing the argument we see that in the first sentence the author presents a cause effect relation: Change of supplier->no profits situation.
In the second sentence the author also claims that the contrary is valid, that is that a no profit situation means a change of the supplier.

The Gap in the author's logic here is that the author neglects that there could be other reasons for the no profit situation.


POE:


(A) The argument is a circular argument made up of an opening claim followed by a conclusion that merely paraphrases that claim.
Not in line with pre-thinking

(B) The argument fails to establish that a condition under which a phenomenon is said to occur is the only condition under which that phenomenon occurs.
Mentioned in pre-thinking, hence correct

(C) The argument involves an equivocation, in that the word “profit” is allowed to shift its meaning during the course of the argument.
Not in line with pre-thinking

(D) The argument erroneously uses an exceptional, isolated case to support a universal conclusion.
Not in line with pre-thinking

(E) The argument explains one event as being caused by another event, even though both events must actually have been caused by some third, unidentified event.
Not in line with pre-thinking
GMAT Club Bot
If Blankenship Enterprises has to switch suppliers in the middle of a [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne