Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

If \(d >0\) and \(0 < 1 - \frac{c}{d} < 1\), which of the following must be true?

I. \(c > 0\) II. \(\frac{c}{d} < 1\) III. \(c^2 + d^2 > 1\)

A. I only B. II only C. I and II only D. II and III only E. I, II, and III[/quote]

\(0<1-\frac{c}{d}<1\) --> add \(-1\) to all three parts of this inequality --> \(-1<-\frac{c}{d}<0\) --> mutliply by \(-1\) and as multiplying by negative flip signs --> \(1>\frac{c}{d}>0\).

So we have that: \(1>\frac{c}{d}>0\)

I. \(c>0\) --> as \(\frac{c}{d}>0\) and \(d>0\), then \(c>0\). Always true.

II. \(\frac{c}{d}<1\) --> directly given as true.

III. \(c^2 + d^2 > 1\) --> if \(c=1\) and \(d=2\), then YES, but if \(c=0.1\) and \(d=0.2\), then No, hences this one is not always true.

Re: If d > 0 and 0 < 1 - c/d < 1, which of the following must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Apr 2012, 18:18

1

This post received KUDOS

kashishh wrote:

Inequalities !! is it possible to get some tips and tools to solve these "sign" (< = > ) questions?

i dunno if my method can help you but i solved it in two ways.

0 < 1 - (c/d) < 1

the way i looked at this problem was to first simply the equation by subtracting 1 in the middle to both sides: -1 < -(c/d) < 0

and the given statement is that d is greater than zero, so d must be positive. if we know a variable is positive, you can safely multiply the variable without changing the signs. so i multiplied d to isolate c. -1(d) < -c < 0(d)

so we get -d < -c < 0

and then i divided the negative out and switched the signs. d > c > 0

the above answers statement I. c > 0 is true. for statement II, i manipulated the above equation by dividing d and i get 1 > c/d > 0 this answers statement II. c/d < 1

the last statement i just tested numbers using the d > c > 0 by using whole numbers and decimals.

the second way i solved this was using bunuel's way.

If d > 0 and 0 < 1 - c/d < 1, which of the following must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Nov 2014, 17:16

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

Hey Guys

May I raise a small question regarding the third statement? If it would be INSTEAD of c^2 + d^2 > 1 be c^2 + d^2 > 0 , would the third statement be considered sufficient? My thinking is as follows:

1. as we know (out of proven first statement) that c>0: multiply the IE with itself leads to: c^2 >0 2. as we know (out of the question stem) that d>0: multiply the IE with itself leads to: d^2 >0 3. Combining the two IE from above by adding them up: c^2 + d^2 >0 4. The MODIFIED Statement 3 is considered sufficient

Would highly appreciate your inputs on my thought...

May I raise a small question regarding the third statement? If it would be INSTEAD of c^2 + d^2 > 1 be c^2 + d^2 > 0 , would the third statement be considered sufficient? My thinking is as follows:

1. as we know (out of proven first statement) that c>0: multiply the IE with itself leads to: c^2 >0 2. as we know (out of the question stem) that d>0: multiply the IE with itself leads to: d^2 >0 3. Combining the two IE from above by adding them up: c^2 + d^2 >0 4. The MODIFIED Statement 3 is considered sufficient

Would highly appreciate your inputs on my thought...

Re: If d > 0 and 0 < 1 - c/d < 1, which of the following must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Nov 2014, 08:42

Bunuel I have just one confusion here, 1> c/d > 0, however st 2 says c/d <1, doesnt the statement also include the cases where c/d<0, where the inequality wont hold so it isnt a MUST BE TRUE statement. Thanks in advance

Bunuel I have just one confusion here, 1> c/d > 0, however st 2 says c/d <1, doesnt the statement also include the cases where c/d<0, where the inequality wont hold so it isnt a MUST BE TRUE statement. Thanks in advance

We got that \(0 < \frac{c}{d} < 1\). So, the answer to the question whether \(\frac{c}{d} < 1\) is true, is YES. How else?
_________________

Re: If d > 0 and 0 < 1 - c/d < 1, which of the following must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Sep 2015, 05:13

1

This post received KUDOS

Bunuel wrote:

sunaimshadmani wrote:

I have just one confusion here, 1> c/d > 0, however st 2 says c/d <1, doesnt the statement also include the cases where c/d<0, where the inequality wont hold so it isnt a MUST BE TRUE statement. Thanks in advance

We got that \(0 < \frac{c}{d} < 1\). So, the answer to the question whether \(\frac{c}{d} < 1\) is true, is YES. How else?

I think what he meant was a different thing.

He assumes that c/d can also be negative. This is not possible, because c has to be bigger than 0 and d is positive (given).

Therefore c/d has to be smaller than 1 (and is NEVER negative).

Hope this helps people who struggeld with this part (like I did )

Re: If d > 0 and 0 < 1 - c/d < 1, which of the following must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Sep 2016, 06:18

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

There’s something in Pacific North West that you cannot find anywhere else. The atmosphere and scenic nature are next to none, with mountains on one side and ocean on...

This month I got selected by Stanford GSB to be included in “Best & Brightest, Class of 2017” by Poets & Quants. Besides feeling honored for being part of...

Joe Navarro is an ex FBI agent who was a founding member of the FBI’s Behavioural Analysis Program. He was a body language expert who he used his ability to successfully...