It is currently 12 Dec 2017, 23:35

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If, in a tennis tournament, a match reaches a fifth-set tiebreak, the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Board of Directors
Status: Aiming MBA
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 2857

Kudos [?]: 965 [0], given: 69

Location: India
Concentration: Healthcare, Technology
GPA: 3.65
WE: Information Technology (Health Care)
Re: If, in a tennis tournament, a match reaches a fifth-set tiebreak, the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2016, 01:12
ynk wrote:
Why not B ?

Also can someone throw light on Method of reasoning & how to solve it in the given timeframe.
Any links or notes will be highly useful.

In B, we have the form If A --> Then B in the first rule.

Then the example says If B--> Then A. Which may or may not be true. Hence , it is incorrect.
_________________

How I improved from V21 to V40! ?

Kudos [?]: 965 [0], given: 69

Manager
Joined: 18 Sep 2015
Posts: 109

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 612

GMAT 1: 610 Q43 V31
GMAT 2: 610 Q47 V27
GMAT 3: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 4: 700 Q49 V35
WE: Project Management (Health Care)
Re: If, in a tennis tournament, a match reaches a fifth-set tiebreak, the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Sep 2016, 10:43
here are the 2 relevant logic rules (according to De Morgan's laws)

1. not (x and y ) = (not x) or (not y)
2. not (x or y) = (not x) and (not y)

The 1st part of correct answer is: [Twins history] and [3 preg.] -> [1 set of twins]
the second part is: [twins history] and (not 1 set of twins) -> (not 3 preg) - this is logically incorrect.

This is true because:
1. not [1set of twins] -> not [twins history] or not [3 preg]
2. if X->y is given, the logical equivalent is x->y or (not y) -> (not x).

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 612

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2017
Posts: 435

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 15

Location: India
Re: If, in a tennis tournament, a match reaches a fifth-set tiebreak, the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Mar 2017, 03:10
a) If a woman with a family history of twins gets pregnant three times, she will have one set of twins. Jennifer, who falls
into this category, had two sets of twins, so she must not have gotten pregnant exactly three times.
b) If a salesman sells more product than anyone else in a calendar year, then he will earn an all-expenses-paid
vacation. Joe earned an all-expense-paid vacation, so he must have sold more product than anyone else for the
year.
c) A newspaper can charge a 50% premium for ads if its circulation surpasses 100,000; if the circulation does not pass
100,000, therefore, the newspaper can't charge any kind of premium for ads.
d) If a student is in the top 10% of her class, she will earn a college scholarship. Anna is not in the top 10% of her class,
so she will not earn a scholarship.
e) All of the players on a football team receive a cash bonus if the team wins the Super Bowl. If quarterback Tom Brady
earned a cash bonus last year, he must have been a member of the winning Super Bowl team.

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 15

Director
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 690

Kudos [?]: 252 [0], given: 855

Location: United States
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: If, in a tennis tournament, a match reaches a fifth-set tiebreak, the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Apr 2017, 19:53
This question is something like: If X then Y. If not Y then not X.....

That is, if we look at the question, then the format is:-

Premise (P): If X then Y.
Conclusion (C): If not Y then not X.

Now formulate the same things for the options also.

A)
Premise (P):If X then Y.
Conclusion (C): If not Y then not X.
(This match the original pattern, hence should be the correct answer).

B)
Premise (P):If X then Y.
Conclusion (C): Y then X. (Wrong, it does not match the pattern).

C)
Premise (P): X then Y. (Wrong, does not match the pattern).
Conclusion (C): If not Y then not X.

D)
Premise (P): If X then Y.
Conclusion (C): If not X then not Y
(Wrong, does not match the original pattern).

E)
Premise (P): X if Y
Conclusion (C): Y then X
(Wrong, does not match the original pattern).
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Kudos [?]: 252 [0], given: 855

Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1254

Kudos [?]: 1362 [0], given: 440

Location: Malaysia
Re: If, in a tennis tournament, a match reaches a fifth-set tiebreak, the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2017, 22:01
IEsailor wrote:
If, in a tennis tournament, a match reaches a fifth-set tiebreak, the lower-ranked player always loses the tiebreak (and, therefore, the match). If Rafael, the second-ranked player, wins a tournament by beating Roger, the top-ranked player, then the match must not have included a fifth-set tiebreak.

Which of the following arguments most closely mimics the reasoning used in the above argument?

(A) If a woman with a family history of twins gets pregnant three times, she will have one set of twins. Jennifer, who falls into this category, had two sets of twins, so she must not have gotten pregnant exactly three times.

(B) If a salesman sells more product than anyone else in a calendar year, then he will earn an all-expenses-paid vacation. Joe earned an all-expense-paid vacation, so he must have sold more product than anyone else for the year.

(C) A newspaper can charge a 50% premium for ads if its circulation surpasses 100,000; if the circulation does not pass 100,000, therefore, the newspaper can't charge any kind of premium for ads.

(D) If a student is in the top 10% of her class, she will earn a college scholarship. Anna is not in the top 10% of her class, so she will not earn a scholarship.

(E) All of the players on a football team receive a cash bonus if the team wins the Super Bowl. If quarterback Tom Brady earned a cash bonus last year, he must have been a member of the winning Super Bowl team.

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

On a "mimic the argument" question, it's useful to use logic notation to understand the flow of the argument. In this case, we're told that IF A happens (a match reaches a fifth-set tiebreak), THEN B will definitely happen (the lower-ranked player loses). Standard logic rules tell us that, when given "If A, then B," the only definite conclusion we can draw is "If not B, then not A." In other words, if A always leads to B, and B doesn't happen, then A can't have happened either. The second sentence of the argument shows this principle: If not B (the lower-ranked player doesn't lose), then not A (there wasn't a fifth-set tiebreak). So we need to find another argument that follows this pattern: If A, then B; if not B, then not A.

(A) CORRECT. If A (a woman with a family history of twins gets pregnant 3 times), then B (she will have 1 set of twins). Note that these numbers are precise: if she gets pregnant exactly three times, she will have exactly one set of twins. If not B (a woman with a family history of twins has 2 sets of twins - that is, not 1), then not A (she must have gotten pregnant either fewer than 3 times or more than 3 times - that is, not exactly 3 times).

(B) If A (a salesman sells more product than anyone else), then B (he will earn an all-expenses-paid vacation). If B (Joe earned the trip), then A (he must have sold more than anyone else). We can see why logic rules do not include "if B, then A" as a logical conclusion: A may always lead to B, but B does not necessarily have to lead to A. There may be other ways to earn the trip besides selling more than anyone else.

(C) If A (a newspaper's circulation surpasses 100,000), then B (the newspaper can charge a 50% premium). If not A (the circulation doesn't surpass 100,000), then not C (the newspaper cannot charge any premium). The final assertion here does not match the initial A / B argument We know nothing about any other premium the newspaper might charge; we are only given information about charging a 50% premium.

(D) If A (a student is in the top 10% of the class), then B (she will earn a scholarship). If not A (Anna is not in the top 10%), then not B (she won't earn a scholarship). We can see why logic rules do not include "if not A, then not B" as a logical conclusion: A may always lead to B, but it doesn't have to be the only way to reach B. There may be other ways to earn a scholarship besides being in the top 10% of the class.

(E) If A (the team wins the Super Bowl), then B (the players receive a bonus). If not A (a player was not on the winning team), then not B (the player won't receive a bonus). We can see why logic rules do not include "if not A, then not B" as a logical conclusion: A may always lead to B, but it doesn't have to be the only way to reach B. There may be other ways to earn a bonus besides winning the Super Bowl.
_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Kudos [?]: 1362 [0], given: 440

Re: If, in a tennis tournament, a match reaches a fifth-set tiebreak, the   [#permalink] 16 Sep 2017, 22:01

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 25 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by