Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

If j and k are positive integers where k > j, what is the value of the remainder when k is divided by j?

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5.

(2) j > 5

Got the answer as E , can someone testify ..whether the answer ..i am getting is right or wrong and also post the explanation.

Thanks

Positive integer \(a\) divided by positive integer \(d\) yields a reminder of \(r\) can always be expressed as \(a=qd+r\), where \(q\) is called a quotient and \(r\) is called a remainder, note here that \(0\leq{r}<d\) (remainder is non-negative integer and always less than divisor).

So according to above \(k\) is divided by \(j\) yields a remainder of \(r\) can be expressed as: \(k=qj+r\), where \(0\leq{r}<j=divisor\). Question: \(r=?\)

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5 --> it's tempting to say that this statement is sufficient and \(r=5\), as given equation is very similar to \(k=qj+r\). But we don't know whether \(5<j\): remainder must be less than divisor.

For example: If \(k=6\) and \(j=1\) then \(6=1*1+5\) and the remainder upon division 6 by 1 is zero; If \(k=11\) and \(j=6\) then \(11=1*6+5\) and the remainder upon division 11 by 6 is 5. Not sufficient.

(2) \(j > 5\) --> clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) \(k = jm + 5\) and \(j > 5\) --> direct formula of remainder as defined above --> \(r=5\). Sufficient.

Or: \(k = jm + 5\) --> first term \(jm\) is clearly divisible by \(j\) and 5 divided by \(j\) as (\(j>5\)) yields remainder of 5.

If j and k are positive integers where k > j, what is the value of the remainder when k is divided by j?

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5.

(2) j > 5

Got the answer as E , can someone testify ..whether the answer ..i am getting is right or wrong and also post the explanation.

Thanks

Positive integer \(a\) divided by positive integer \(d\) yields a reminder of \(r\) can always be expressed as \(a=qd+r\), where \(q\) is called a quotient and \(r\) is called a remainder, note here that \(0\leq{r}<d\) (remainder is non-negative integer and always less than divisor).

So according to above \(k\) is divided by \(j\) yields a remainder of \(r\) can be expressed as: \(k=qj+r\), where \(0\leq{r}<j=divisor\). Question: \(r=?\)

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5 --> it's tempting to say that this statement is sufficient and \(r=5\), as given equation is very similar to \(k=qj+r\). But we don't know whether \(5<j\): remainder must be less than divisor.

For example: If \(k=6\) and \(j=1\) then \(6=1*1+5\) and the remainder upon division 6 by 1 is zero; If \(k=11\) and \(j=6\) then \(11=1*6+5\) and the remainder upon division 11 by 6 is 5. Not sufficient.

(2) \(j > 5\) --> clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) \(k = jm + 5\) and \(j > 5\) --> direct formula of remainder as defined above --> \(r=5\). Sufficient.

Or: \(k = jm + 5\) --> first term \(jm\) is clearly divisible by \(j\) and 5 divided by \(j\) as (\(j>5\)) yields remainder of 5.

If j and k are positive integers where k > j, what is the value of the remainder when k is divided by j?

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5.

(2) j > 5

Got the answer as E , can someone testify ..whether the answer ..i am getting is right or wrong and also post the explanation.

Thanks

Positive integer \(a\) divided by positive integer \(d\) yields a reminder of \(r\) can always be expressed as \(a=qd+r\), where \(q\) is called a quotient and \(r\) is called a remainder, note here that \(0\leq{r}<d\) (remainder is non-negative integer and always less than divisor).

So according to above \(k\) is divided by \(j\) yields a remainder of \(r\) can be expressed as: \(k=qj+r\), where \(0\leq{r}<j=divisor\). Question: \(r=?\)

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5 --> it's tempting to say that this statement is sufficient and \(r=5\), as given equation is very similar to \(k=qj+r\). But we don't know whether \(5<j\): remainder must be less than divisor.

For example: If \(k=6\) and \(j=1\) then \(6=1*1+5\) and the remainder upon division 6 by 1 is zero; If \(k=11\) and \(j=6\) then \(11=1*6+5\) and the remainder upon division 11 by 6 is 5. Not sufficient.

(2) \(j > 5\) --> clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) \(k = jm + 5\) and \(j > 5\) --> direct formula of remainder as defined above --> \(r=5\). Sufficient.

Or: \(k = jm + 5\) --> first term \(jm\) is clearly divisible by \(j\) and 5 divided by \(j\) as (\(j>5\)) yields remainder of 5.

Answer: C.

I do not understand why the reminder is still 5....

If you have 25=20*2 + 5 than reminder is 5. But if K/J than the reminder is 5/10: 0.5 not 5. And indeed 25/10=2.5 and 2+0.5=2.5

Therefore, the value of the reminder when K is divided by J is correlated with the value of J.

This is why I answered E because we do not know the value of J.

Where did I get wrong?

Thanks!

The remainder when k=25 is divided by j=20 is 5. The remainder when k=5 is divided by j=10 is 5 too.

Re: If j and k are positive integers where k > j, what is the [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 Mar 2017, 01:01

1

This post received KUDOS

We are told that k > j > 0, and both k and j are integers. The remainder when k is divided by j may be expressed as r in this formula: k = jq + r In this formula, (a) all of the variables are integers, (b) q (the quotient) is the greatest number of j's such that jx < k, and (c) r < j. (If r were greater than j, then q would not be the greatest number of j's in k.) Thus, the question may be rephrased: “If k = jq + r, and q is maximized such that jq < k and r < j, what is the value of r?” (1) INSUFFICIENT: At first glance, this may seem sufficient since it is in the form of our remainder equation. Certainly, m could equal q (the quotient) and r (the remainder) could be 5.

For example, k = 13 and j = 8 yield a remainder of 5 when k is divided by j: 13 = (8)(1) + 5, where m = 1 is the greatest number of 8's such that (8)(1) < 13, and r < j (i.e. 5 < 8). However, this statement does not indicate whether m is the greatest number of j's such that jm < k and r < j, as our rephrased question requires. For example, k = 13 and j = 2 may be expressed in this form: 13 = (2)(4) + 5, where m = 4. However, 5 is not the remainder because 5 > j, and 4 is not the greatest number of 2's in 13. When 13 is divided by 2, the quotient is 6 and the remainder is 1. If j ≤ 5, then 5 cannot be the remainder and m is not the quotient. If j > 5, then 5 must be the remainder and m must be the quotient.

(2) INSUFFICIENT: This statement gives us a range of possible values of j. Without information about k, we cannot determine anything about the remainder when k is divided by j.

(1) AND (2) SUFFICIENT: Statement (2) tells us that j > 5, so we can conclude from statement (1) that 5 is the remainder and m is the quotient when k is divided by j. The correct answer is C.
_________________

If j and k are positive integers where k > j, what is the value of the remainder when k is divided by j?

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5.

(2) j > 5

Got the answer as E , can someone testify ..whether the answer ..i am getting is right or wrong and also post the explanation.

Thanks

Positive integer \(a\) divided by positive integer \(d\) yields a reminder of \(r\) can always be expressed as \(a=qd+r\), where \(q\) is called a quotient and \(r\) is called a remainder, note here that \(0\leq{r}<d\) (remainder is non-negative integer and always less than divisor).

So according to above \(k\) is divided by \(j\) yields a remainder of \(r\) can be expressed as: \(k=qj+r\), where \(0\leq{r}<j=divisor\). Question: \(r=?\)

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5 --> it's tempting to say that this statement is sufficient and \(r=5\), as given equation is very similar to \(k=qj+r\). But we don't know whether \(5<j\): remainder must be less than divisor.

For example: If \(k=6\) and \(j=1\) then \(6=1*1+5\) and the remainder upon division 6 by 1 is zero; If \(k=11\) and \(j=6\) then \(11=1*6+5\) and the remainder upon division 11 by 6 is 5. Not sufficient.

(2) \(j > 5\) --> clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) \(k = jm + 5\) and \(j > 5\) --> direct formula of remainder as defined above --> \(r=5\). Sufficient.

Or: \(k = jm + 5\) --> first term \(jm\) is clearly divisible by \(j\) and 5 divided by \(j\) as (\(j>5\)) yields remainder of 5.

Answer: C.

Hi Bunuel,

Could you please elaborate as to why A is not the right answer. Would really appreciate it. Thanks

If j and k are positive integers where k > j, what is the value of the remainder when k is divided by j?

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5.

(2) j > 5

Got the answer as E , can someone testify ..whether the answer ..i am getting is right or wrong and also post the explanation.

Thanks

Positive integer \(a\) divided by positive integer \(d\) yields a reminder of \(r\) can always be expressed as \(a=qd+r\), where \(q\) is called a quotient and \(r\) is called a remainder, note here that \(0\leq{r}<d\) (remainder is non-negative integer and always less than divisor).

So according to above \(k\) is divided by \(j\) yields a remainder of \(r\) can be expressed as: \(k=qj+r\), where \(0\leq{r}<j=divisor\). Question: \(r=?\)

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5 --> it's tempting to say that this statement is sufficient and \(r=5\), as given equation is very similar to \(k=qj+r\). But we don't know whether \(5<j\): remainder must be less than divisor.

For example: If \(k=6\) and \(j=1\) then \(6=1*1+5\) and the remainder upon division 6 by 1 is zero; If \(k=11\) and \(j=6\) then \(11=1*6+5\) and the remainder upon division 11 by 6 is 5. Not sufficient.

(2) \(j > 5\) --> clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) \(k = jm + 5\) and \(j > 5\) --> direct formula of remainder as defined above --> \(r=5\). Sufficient.

Or: \(k = jm + 5\) --> first term \(jm\) is clearly divisible by \(j\) and 5 divided by \(j\) as (\(j>5\)) yields remainder of 5.

Answer: C.

Hi Bunuel,

Could you please elaborate as to why A is not the right answer. Would really appreciate it. Thanks

Consider the examples for the first statement given in my solution proving that this statement is not sufficient.
_________________

If j and k are positive integers where k > j, what is the value of the remainder when k is divided by j?

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5.

(2) j > 5

Got the answer as E , can someone testify ..whether the answer ..i am getting is right or wrong and also post the explanation.

Thanks

Positive integer \(a\) divided by positive integer \(d\) yields a reminder of \(r\) can always be expressed as \(a=qd+r\), where \(q\) is called a quotient and \(r\) is called a remainder, note here that \(0\leq{r}<d\) (remainder is non-negative integer and always less than divisor).

So according to above \(k\) is divided by \(j\) yields a remainder of \(r\) can be expressed as: \(k=qj+r\), where \(0\leq{r}<j=divisor\). Question: \(r=?\)

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5 --> it's tempting to say that this statement is sufficient and \(r=5\), as given equation is very similar to \(k=qj+r\). But we don't know whether \(5<j\): remainder must be less than divisor.

For example: If \(k=6\) and \(j=1\) then \(6=1*1+5\) and the remainder upon division 6 by 1 is zero; If \(k=11\) and \(j=6\) then \(11=1*6+5\) and the remainder upon division 11 by 6 is 5. Not sufficient.

(2) \(j > 5\) --> clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) \(k = jm + 5\) and \(j > 5\) --> direct formula of remainder as defined above --> \(r=5\). Sufficient.

Or: \(k = jm + 5\) --> first term \(jm\) is clearly divisible by \(j\) and 5 divided by \(j\) as (\(j>5\)) yields remainder of 5.

Answer: C.

I do not understand why the reminder is still 5....

If you have 25=20*2 + 5 than reminder is 5. But if K/J than the reminder is 5/10: 0.5 not 5. And indeed 25/10=2.5 and 2+0.5=2.5

Therefore, the value of the reminder when K is divided by J is correlated with the value of J.

This is why I answered E because we do not know the value of J.

Hi, would be grateful if someone could elaborate on first statement. Can't understand how given statement 'k=jm+5' is not the same as 'a=qd+r'.

Thanks

Have you read this: (1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5 --> it's tempting to say that this statement is sufficient and \(r=5\), as given equation is very similar to \(k=qj+r\). But we don't know whether \(5<j\): remainder must be less than divisor.

For example: If \(k=6\) and \(j=1\) then \(6=1*1+5\) and the remainder upon division 6 by 1 is zero; If \(k=11\) and \(j=6\) then \(11=1*6+5\) and the remainder upon division 11 by 6 is 5. Not sufficient.
_________________

Re: If j and k are positive integers where k > j, what is the [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 May 2016, 03:33

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

There’s something in Pacific North West that you cannot find anywhere else. The atmosphere and scenic nature are next to none, with mountains on one side and ocean on...

This month I got selected by Stanford GSB to be included in “Best & Brightest, Class of 2017” by Poets & Quants. Besides feeling honored for being part of...

Joe Navarro is an ex FBI agent who was a founding member of the FBI’s Behavioural Analysis Program. He was a body language expert who he used his ability to successfully...