It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 17:33

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 06 Oct 2009
Posts: 104

Kudos [?]: 180 [1], given: 4

Location: Mexico
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GPA: 3.85
WE: Sales (Commercial Banking)
If k is not equal to 0, 1, or -1 is 1/k > 0? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2010, 12:05
1
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

56% (00:47) correct 44% (01:06) wrong based on 286 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

If k is not equal to 0, 1, or -1 is 1/k > 0?

(1) 1/(k-1) > 0
(2) 1/(k+1) > 0

My method for this sort of questions is way underdeveloped. I will appreciate any hints on how to tackle this sort of problems. Many thanks in advance.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 180 [1], given: 4

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 41873

Kudos [?]: 128604 [4], given: 12180

Re: Number Properties, Data sufficiency. [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2010, 12:25
4
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
If k#0, 1 or -1 is $$\frac{1}{k}> 0$$?

Basically the question asks: is $$k>0$$?

(1) $$\frac{1}{k-1}> 0$$ --> the denominator must be positive: $$k-1>0$$--> $$k>1$$, hence $$\frac{1}{k}>0$$. Sufficient.

(2) $$\frac{1}{k+1}> 0$$--> the denominator must be positive: $$k+1>0$$ --> $$k>-1$$, hence $$k$$ can be negative as well as positive: $$\frac{1}{k}$$ may or may not be $$>0$$. Not sufficient.

Hope it's clear.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 128604 [4], given: 12180

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 41873

Kudos [?]: 128604 [4], given: 12180

Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2012, 04:09
4
KUDOS
Expert's post
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
If k#0, 1 or -1 is $$\frac{1}{k}> 0$$?

Basically the question asks: is $$k>0$$?

(1) $$\frac{1}{k-1}> 0$$ --> denominator is positive: $$k-1>0$$--> $$k>1$$, hence $$\frac{1}{k}>0$$. Sufficient.

(2) $$\frac{1}{k+1}> 0$$--> denominator is positive: $$k+1>0$$ --> $$k>-1$$, hence $$k$$ can be negative as well as positive: $$\frac{1}{k}$$ may or may not be $$>0$$. Not sufficient.

Hope it's clear.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 128604 [4], given: 12180

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 41873

Kudos [?]: 128604 [1], given: 12180

Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2015, 08:32
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
Turkish wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Turkish wrote:
Hello Bunuel,

I am not getting this. why is is k>0?

Thanks

Turk

Which statement are you referring to?

In your explanation you said " Basically the question asks: is k>0? " I am not getting how the question is asking whether k>0?

The question asks whether $$\frac{1}{k}$$ is positive. The numerator, which is 1, is positive, thus in order the fraction to be positive, the denominator must also be positive.

Hope it's clear.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 128604 [1], given: 12180

Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 793

Kudos [?]: 1185 [0], given: 25

Location: London
Re: GMAT Prep: Inequalities [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2010, 02:46
IF (1) is true, it implies K>1, which implies 1/K > 0

If (2) is true, it implies K>-1, which gives no information on the sign on 1/K

So (1) alone without (2) is sufficient to answer the question
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1185 [0], given: 25

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 41873

Kudos [?]: 128604 [0], given: 12180

Re: GMAT Prep CAT Inequalities question [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2010, 01:20
Merging similar topics. Please refer to the solutions above.

tonebeeze wrote:
*should I always assume that the variable can be a real number, unless otherwise stated?

The GMAT is dealing only with Real Numbers: Integers, Fractions and Irrational Numbers. So all numbers on the GMAT are real numbers and otherwise never will be stated.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 128604 [0], given: 12180

Current Student
Joined: 21 Aug 2010
Posts: 203

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 28

If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2011, 11:24
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0

(1) 1/(k-1) > 0
(2) 1/(k+1) > 0

Last edited by Bunuel on 19 Feb 2012, 04:08, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question and added the OA

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 28

Manager
Status: Persevering
Joined: 15 May 2013
Posts: 218

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 34

Location: India
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: If k <> 0, 1, or -1, is 1/k > 0 ? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2013, 05:32
It must be A.

Again it is not mentioned that k is an integer.

1) 1/k-1>0 => k can be any value greater than 1 to satisfy this equation hence 1/k >0; sufficient.
2) 1/1+k>0 => if k=0.5 then 1/k >0 it holds true, but if k=-0.5 this equation still holds whereas, 1/k<0; therefore not sufficient.

--
Ramandeep
_________________

--It's one thing to get defeated, but another to accept it.

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 34

Manager
Joined: 13 Jun 2012
Posts: 118

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 332

Location: United States
WE: Supply Chain Management (Computer Hardware)
Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2015, 08:28
Bunuel wrote:
Turkish wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
1. If k#0, 1 or -1 is $$\frac{1}{k}> 0$$?

(1) $$\frac{1}{k-1}> 0$$ --> $$k-1>0$$--> $$k>1$$, hence $$\frac{1}{k}>0$$. Sufficient.

(2) $$\frac{1}{k+1}> 0$$--> $$k+1>0$$ --> $$k>-1$$, hence $$k$$ can be negative as well as positive: $$\frac{1}{k}$$ may or may not be $$>0$$. Not sufficient.

Hello Bunuel,

I am not getting this. why is is k>0?

Thanks

Turk

Which statement are you referring to?

In your explanation you said " Basically the question asks: is k>0? " I am not getting how the question is asking whether k>0?

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 332

Manager
Joined: 29 Dec 2014
Posts: 81

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 997

Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2016, 07:50
Bunuel wrote:
If k#0, 1 or -1 is $$\frac{1}{k}> 0$$?

Basically the question asks: is $$k>0$$?

(1) $$\frac{1}{k-1}> 0$$ --> denominator is positive: $$k-1>0$$--> $$k>1$$, hence $$\frac{1}{k}>0$$. Sufficient.

(2) $$\frac{1}{k+1}> 0$$--> denominator is positive: $$k+1>0$$ --> $$k>-1$$, hence $$k$$ can be negative as well as positive: $$\frac{1}{k}$$ may or may not be $$>0$$. Not sufficient.

Hope it's clear.

A very fundamental or maybe silly question regarding such questions: when we are deducing from (1/K)>0 -> K>0.. how are we doing that, as assuming 0/0 on the RHS would be undefined.

Thanks

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 997

Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2676

Kudos [?]: 1722 [0], given: 792

Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: Kellogg '18 (M)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2016, 08:04
WilDThiNg wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
If k#0, 1 or -1 is $$\frac{1}{k}> 0$$?

Basically the question asks: is $$k>0$$?

(1) $$\frac{1}{k-1}> 0$$ --> denominator is positive: $$k-1>0$$--> $$k>1$$, hence $$\frac{1}{k}>0$$. Sufficient.

(2) $$\frac{1}{k+1}> 0$$--> denominator is positive: $$k+1>0$$ --> $$k>-1$$, hence $$k$$ can be negative as well as positive: $$\frac{1}{k}$$ may or may not be $$>0$$. Not sufficient.

Hope it's clear.

A very fundamental or maybe silly question regarding such questions: when we are deducing from (1/K)>0 -> K>0.. how are we doing that, as assuming 0/0 on the RHS would be undefined.

Thanks

No, we are not assuming 0/0. When you are given a/b > 0 this means that the fraction a/b > 0 ---> 2 cases possible,

Case 1, either both a,b > 0 or

Case 2, both a,b < 0.

You can try the following examples to see the above 2 cases:

Case 1: a=1, b = 2, a/b = 0.5 > 0

Case 2, a=-1, b = -5 , a/b = 0.2 > 0

But if lets say you have a=-1 and b = 2 or a=2 and b= -3 , a/b <0 and NOT >0.

You can even remember this that in order for a fraction a/b to be >0 ---> both a,b MUST have the same signs. Either both of them are >0 or both of them are negative.

Coming back to the question,

When you are given 1/k > 0 ---> 1 is already >0 so based on the 'rule' above, k must also be positive in order for 1 and k to have the same 'sign'. Thus k>0.

Similarly, if 1/(k-1) > 0 ---> k-1 > 0 ---> k >1 etc.

Hope this helps.
_________________

Thursday with Ron updated list as of July 1st, 2015: http://gmatclub.com/forum/consolidated-thursday-with-ron-list-for-all-the-sections-201006.html#p1544515
Rules for Posting in Quant Forums: http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-please-read-this-before-posting-133935.html
Everything Related to Inequalities: http://gmatclub.com/forum/inequalities-made-easy-206653.html#p1582891
Inequalities tips: http://gmatclub.com/forum/inequalities-tips-and-hints-175001.html
Debrief, 650 to 750: http://gmatclub.com/forum/650-to-750-a-10-month-journey-to-the-score-203190.html

Kudos [?]: 1722 [0], given: 792

Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 4120

Kudos [?]: 2885 [0], given: 0

GPA: 3.82
Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2016, 05:34
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0

(1) 1/(k-1) > 0
(2) 1/(k+1) > 0

When it comes to inequality DS questions, 2 things are important at all times. First is square. Secondly, when range of que includes range of con, the con is sufficient.
Modify the original condition and the question. Multiply k^2 on the both equations and the sign of inequality doesn't change as k^2 is still a positive integer even when it's multiplied. There is 1 variable(k), which should match with the number of equations. So you need 1 equation, for 1) 1 equation, for 2) q equation, which is likely to make D the answer.
For 1), multiply (k-1)^2 on the both equations, they become k-1>0, k>1. The range of que includes the range of con, which is sufficient.
For 2), multiply (k-1)^2 on the both equations, they become k-1>0, k>1. The range of que doesn't include the range of con, which is not sufficient
Therefore, the answer is A.

-> For cases where we need 1 more equation, such as original conditions with “1 variable”, or “2 variables and 1 equation”, or “3 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 59 % chance that D is the answer, while A or B has 38% chance and C or E has 3% chance. Since D is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition. Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or E.
_________________

MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spare
The one-and-only World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy.
Find a 10% off coupon code for GMAT Club members.
“Receive 5 Math Questions & Solutions Daily”
Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons - try it yourself
See our Youtube demo

Kudos [?]: 2885 [0], given: 0

BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Posts: 2212

Kudos [?]: 836 [0], given: 595

Re: If k is not equal to 0, 1, or -1 is 1/k > 0? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Mar 2016, 21:58
Bull78 wrote:
If k is not equal to 0, 1, or -1 is 1/k > 0?

(1) 1/(k-1) > 0
(2) 1/(k+1) > 0

My method for this sort of questions is way underdeveloped. I will appreciate any hints on how to tackle this sort of problems. Many thanks in advance.

Fun Fact => if K was an integer than then D would be the choice.
_________________

Give me a hell yeah ...!!!!!

Kudos [?]: 836 [0], given: 595

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 16760

Kudos [?]: 273 [0], given: 0

Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Feb 2017, 07:08
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 273 [0], given: 0

Re: If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0   [#permalink] 07 Feb 2017, 07:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# If k does not equal 0, 1 or -1, is 1/k >0 (1) 1/(k-1) > 0

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.