It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 19:59

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If n > 2, then the sum, S, of the integers from 1 through n

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 01 Aug 2011
Posts: 23

Kudos [?]: 7 [1], given: 15

If n > 2, then the sum, S, of the integers from 1 through n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2012, 04:53
1
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

68% (01:06) correct 32% (00:49) wrong based on 174 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

If n > 2, then the sum, S, of the integers from 1 through n can be calculated by the following formula: S = n(n + 1)/2. Which one of the following statements about S must be true?

A. S is always odd.
B. S is always even.
C. S must be a prime number
D. S must not be a prime number
E. S must be a perfect square

Can you please explain between B & D. Both need to be correct in order for the question to be valid right ?

(S needs to be even to be divisible by 2 & S shouldn't be a prime number)

Thanks,
Shreya
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 7 [1], given: 15

Manager
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 13

Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.69
WE: Analyst (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
Re: If n > 2, then the sum, S, of the integers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2012, 05:41
S does not necessarily have to be even. For example, when n=5, you have:

S = [(5)(5+1)]/2 = 15, an odd number

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 13

Joined: 29 Mar 2012
Posts: 320

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 23

Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q50 V26
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V28
GMAT 3: 730 Q50 V38
Re: If n > 2, then the sum, S, of the integers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2012, 05:49
Hi,

S = n(n + 1)/2, n > 2
for ex, n = 3, S = 6
n=5, S = 15 = 3*5 and so on

Now,
if n is even,
then, n = 2k, S = k(2k+1)....(a)

if n is odd,
then, n = 2k+1, S = (2k+1)(k+1)...(b)

Depending on value of k (integer), S can be odd/even
But for n>2, it will always be a product of two numbers....(from (a) & (b))

Regards,

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 23

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42269

Kudos [?]: 132851 [0], given: 12378

Re: If n > 2, then the sum, S, of the integers from 1 through n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2012, 14:26
If n > 2, then the sum, S, of the integers from 1 through n can be calculated by the following formula: S = n(n + 1)/2. Which one of the following statements about S must be true?
A. S is always odd.
B. S is always even.
C. S must be a prime number
D. S must not be a prime number
E. S must be a perfect square

Notice that we are asked "which of the following MUST be true, not COULD be true. For such kind of questions if you can prove that a statement is NOT true for one particular set of numbers, it will mean that this statement is not always true and hence not a correct answer.

A. S is always odd --> not necessarily true if n=3 then 1+2+3=6=even.
B. S is always even --> not necessarily true if n=5 then 1+2+3+4+5=15=odd.
C. S must be a prime number --> not true if n=3 then 1+2+3=6=not prime.
E. S must be a perfect square --> not necessarily true if n=3 then 1+2+3=6=not a perfect square.

Only choice D is left.

_________________

Kudos [?]: 132851 [0], given: 12378

Intern
Joined: 02 Nov 2012
Posts: 35

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 11

Re: If n > 2, then the sum, S, of the integers from 1 through n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2012, 04:43
Correct me if I am not right, but since n > 2, S is always even since odd * even = even and 2 is the only even prime number S can never be a prime number!

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 11

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42269

Kudos [?]: 132851 [0], given: 12378

Re: If n > 2, then the sum, S, of the integers from 1 through n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2012, 04:56
KevinBrink wrote:
Correct me if I am not right, but since n > 2, S is always even since odd * even = even and 2 is the only even prime number S can never be a prime number!

No, that's not correct. If S is always even, then B must also be correct. But if n=5 then 1+2+3+4+5=15=odd.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 132851 [0], given: 12378

Current Student
Joined: 12 Jan 2012
Posts: 26

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 10

GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
Re: If n > 2, then the sum, S, of the integers from 1 through n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2013, 01:05
shreya717 wrote:
If n > 2, then the sum, S, of the integers from 1 through n can be calculated by the following formula: S = n(n + 1)/2. Which one of the following statements about S must be true?

A. S is always odd.
B. S is always even.
C. S must be a prime number
D. S must not be a prime number
E. S must be a perfect square

Can you please explain between B & D. Both need to be correct in order for the question to be valid right ?

(S needs to be even to be divisible by 2 & S shouldn't be a prime number)

Thanks,
Shreya

S = [n(n+1)]/2 for n>2 S should be divisible by either n or n+1 (for n = odd S is divisible by n and for n=even S is divisible by n+1) so it cannot be a prime no.

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 10

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7738

Kudos [?]: 17822 [0], given: 235

Location: Pune, India
Re: If n > 2, then the sum, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2014, 21:49
akankshasoneja wrote:
If n > 2, then the sum, S, of the integers from 1 through n can be calculated by the following
formula: S = n(n + 1)/2. Which one of the following statements about S must be true?
(A) S is always odd.
(B) S is always even.
(C) S must be a prime number.
(D) S must not be a prime number.
(E) S must be a perfect square.

[Reveal] Spoiler: My doubt
Though i agree that the OA is right but even option B should be correct.

Put n = 5

S = 5*6/2 = 15
S is not always even. It may be even, it may be odd. If the even integer (out of n and n+1) is not a multiple of 4, then S will be odd.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17822 [0], given: 235

Current Student
Joined: 10 Oct 2013
Posts: 33

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 44

Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
Re: If n > 2, then the sum, S, of the integers from 1 through n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jan 2014, 23:54
S= n (n+1) /2 ,
Either n or n+1 , is even & also n > 2,
Thus after dividing by 2, S can be shown to be a product of two distinct numbers (not including 1) ----> S can never be prime . So D it is

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 44

Current Student
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1972

Kudos [?]: 742 [0], given: 355

Concentration: Finance
Re: If n > 2, then the sum, S, of the integers from 1 through n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Feb 2014, 09:43
Bunuel wrote:
If n > 2, then the sum, S, of the integers from 1 through n can be calculated by the following formula: S = n(n + 1)/2. Which one of the following statements about S must be true?
A. S is always odd.
B. S is always even.
C. S must be a prime number
D. S must not be a prime number
E. S must be a perfect square

Notice that we are asked "which of the following MUST be true, not COULD be true. For such kind of questions if you can prove that a statement is NOT true for one particular set of numbers, it will mean that this statement is not always true and hence not a correct answer.

A. S is always odd --> not necessarily true if n=3 then 1+2+3=6=even.
B. S is always even --> not necessarily true if n=5 then 1+2+3+4+5=15=odd.
C. S must be a prime number --> not true if n=3 then 1+2+3=6=not prime.
E. S must be a perfect square --> not necessarily true if n=3 then 1+2+3=6=not a perfect square.

Only choice D is left.

Does anyone know why can't the sum be a prime number?

So I began trying to understand this. First since all prime numbers greater than 3 are of the form 6k+1 or 6k-1
Now then let's take 1+6k, that means that 2+3+4......+n cannot be a multiple of 6, but i'm trying to figure out why this can't be true?

Thanks
Cheers
J

Bumpinggg

Kudos [?]: 742 [0], given: 355

Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 15614

Kudos [?]: 283 [0], given: 0

Re: If n > 2, then the sum, S, of the integers from 1 through n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jul 2015, 19:42
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 283 [0], given: 0

Re: If n > 2, then the sum, S, of the integers from 1 through n   [#permalink] 05 Jul 2015, 19:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by