Last visit was: 08 Dec 2024, 18:16 It is currently 08 Dec 2024, 18:16
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
505-555 Level|   Inequalities|   Roots|                                       
User avatar
Walkabout
Joined: 02 Dec 2012
Last visit: 06 Dec 2024
Posts: 172
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 29
Products:
Posts: 172
Kudos: 25,636
 [164]
13
Kudos
Add Kudos
148
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 08 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,638
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88,214
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,638
Kudos: 684,245
 [38]
18
Kudos
Add Kudos
20
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 08 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,638
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88,214
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,638
Kudos: 684,245
 [31]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
25
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 08 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,638
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88,214
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,638
Kudos: 684,245
 [27]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
16
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
LucyDang
Bunuel
If n and k are positive integers, is \(\sqrt{n+k}>2\sqrt{n}\)?

Both parts of the inequality are positive, thus we can square it, to get "is \(n+k>4n\)?" --> is \(k>3n\)?

(1) k > 3n. Sufficient.

(2) n + k > 3n --> \(k>2n\). Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hi Bunuel,

I don't understand why n & k are positive then two parts of the inequility \(\sqrt{n+k}>2\sqrt{n}\) are positive.

What I understand is that: n, k>0 => n+k>0 => \(\sqrt{n+k}\) might be positive or negative. e.g: x=9>0 --> \(\sqrt{x}\) = 3 or -3
Same thought or n!

Please help me to clarify, thank you so much!

When the GMAT provides the square root sign for an even root, such as \(\sqrt{x}\) or \(\sqrt[4]{x}\), then the only accepted answer is the positive root.

That is, \(\sqrt{9}=3\), NOT +3 or -3. In contrast, the equation \(x^2=9\) has TWO solutions, +3 and -3. Even roots have only non-negative value on the GMAT.

Odd roots will have the same sign as the base of the root. For example, \(\sqrt[3]{125} =5\) and \(\sqrt[3]{-64} =-4\).

Hope it helps.
General Discussion
User avatar
LucyDang
Joined: 24 Mar 2010
Last visit: 22 Jun 2017
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
392
 [4]
Given Kudos: 105
Posts: 57
Kudos: 392
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If n and k are positive integers, is \(\sqrt{n+k}>2\sqrt{n}\)?

Both parts of the inequality are positive, thus we can square it, to get "is \(n+k>4n\)?" --> is \(k>3n\)?

(1) k > 3n. Sufficient.

(2) n + k > 3n --> \(k>2n\). Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hi Bunuel,

I don't understand why n & k are positive then two parts of the inequility \(\sqrt{n+k}>2\sqrt{n}\) are positive.

What I understand is that: n, k>0 => n+k>0 => \(\sqrt{n+k}\) might be positive or negative. e.g: x=9>0 --> \(\sqrt{x}\) = 3 or -3
Same thought or n!

Please help me to clarify, thank you so much!
avatar
tobiasfr
Joined: 07 Aug 2014
Last visit: 28 Mar 2016
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 75
Posts: 1
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If n and k are positive integers, is \(\sqrt{n+k}>2\sqrt{n}\)?

Both parts of the inequality are positive, thus we can square it, to get "is \(n+k>4n\)?" --> is \(k>3n\)?

(1) k > 3n. Sufficient.

(2) n + k > 3n --> \(k>2n\). Not sufficient.

Answer: A.


How do you get to the conclusion that \(\sqrt{n+k}>2\sqrt{n}\)? Even if k > 3n it can be either n+k > 4n or n+k < 4n, since we don't know more about n.

Thanks :).
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 08 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,638
Own Kudos:
684,245
 [2]
Given Kudos: 88,214
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,638
Kudos: 684,245
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tobiasfr
Bunuel
If n and k are positive integers, is \(\sqrt{n+k}>2\sqrt{n}\)?

Both parts of the inequality are positive, thus we can square it, to get "is \(n+k>4n\)?" --> is \(k>3n\)?

(1) k > 3n. Sufficient.

(2) n + k > 3n --> \(k>2n\). Not sufficient.

Answer: A.


How do you get to the conclusion that \(\sqrt{n+k}>2\sqrt{n}\)? Even if k > 3n it can be either n+k > 4n or n+k < 4n, since we don't know more about n.

Thanks :).

Not sure how you get the above...

Anyway, the question asks whether \(\sqrt{n+k}>2\sqrt{n}\)? After algebraic manipulations shown in my solution the question becomes: is \(k>3n\)? The first statement answers this question, which makes it sufficient.
User avatar
guialain
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 01 Dec 2016
Last visit: 18 Apr 2018
Posts: 78
Own Kudos:
67
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V34
WE:Investment Banking (Finance: Investment Banking)
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V34
Posts: 78
Kudos: 67
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Careless mistake!
Can someone share a link on how to reduce careless mistake please?
Frustrating to miss this kind of easy questions
avatar
IWilWin
Joined: 04 Jun 2012
Last visit: 03 Sep 2018
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 17
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GPA: 3.8
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Bunuel,

I couldn't understand the 2nd part.

The objective is the check if k>3n (after simplification).
From option 2 we find K>2n , so it's also sufficient to answer that K is not greater than 3n.

Please explain.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 08 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,638
Own Kudos:
684,245
 [2]
Given Kudos: 88,214
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,638
Kudos: 684,245
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IWilWin
Hi Bunuel,

I couldn't understand the 2nd part.

The objective is the check if k>3n (after simplification).
From option 2 we find K>2n , so it's also sufficient to answer that K is not greater than 3n.

Please explain.

Say a question asks: is x > 3? We got that x > 2. Is this sufficient to answer the question? No, because if x= 2.5, then the answer is NO but if x = 4, then the answer is YES.
User avatar
avaneeshvyas
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Last visit: 05 Dec 2017
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 32
Kudos: 225
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
IWilWin
Hi Bunuel,

I couldn't understand the 2nd part.

The objective is the check if k>3n (after simplification).
From option 2 we find K>2n , so it's also sufficient to answer that K is not greater than 3n.

Please explain.

Say a question asks: is x > 3? We got that x > 2. Is this sufficient to answer the question? No, because if x= 2.5, then the answer is NO but if x = 4, then the answer is YES.

Bunuel : I always have a confusion in questions such as these...
We know that on simplifying the question stem we get k>3n
The second premise is reduced to k>2n
Now my understanding is that the second premise is sufficient for us to say that k is not greater than 3n, hence answer choice D. When it itself deduces to k>2n isn't it enough for us to answer the original question stem whether k>3n? In this case No k is not greater than 3n
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 08 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,638
Own Kudos:
684,245
 [2]
Given Kudos: 88,214
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,638
Kudos: 684,245
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avaneeshvyas
Bunuel
IWilWin
Hi Bunuel,

I couldn't understand the 2nd part.

The objective is the check if k>3n (after simplification).
From option 2 we find K>2n , so it's also sufficient to answer that K is not greater than 3n.

Please explain.

Say a question asks: is x > 3? We got that x > 2. Is this sufficient to answer the question? No, because if x= 2.5, then the answer is NO but if x = 4, then the answer is YES.

Bunuel : I always have a confusion in questions such as these...
We know that on simplifying the question stem we get k>3n
The second premise is reduced to k>2n
Now my understanding is that the second premise is sufficient for us to say that k is not greater than 3n, hence answer choice D. When it itself deduces to k>2n isn't it enough for us to answer the original question stem whether k>3n? In this case No k is not greater than 3n

No. Say a question asks is x > 3?

(1) x > 2. Is this sufficient to answer the question whether x is greater than 3? No. If x = 100, then we'd have an YES answer to the question but if x = 2.5 (so if x is any number from 2 to 3), then we'd have a NO answer to the question.

In a Yes/No Data Sufficiency questions, statement(s) is sufficient if the answer is “always yes” or “always no” while a statement(s) is insufficient if the answer is "sometimes yes" and "sometimes no".
avatar
Marshy
Joined: 26 May 2016
Last visit: 24 Jul 2018
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
6
 [1]
Given Kudos: 62
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Healthcare
GRE 1: Q303 V304
GPA: 4
WE:Medicine and Health (Consulting)
GRE 1: Q303 V304
Posts: 10
Kudos: 6
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We know that on simplifying the question stem we get k>3n
The second premise is reduced to k>2n
Now my understanding is that the second premise is sufficient for us to say that k is not greater than 3n, hence answer choice D. When it itself deduces to k>2n isn't it enough for us to answer the original question stem whether k>3n? In this case No k is not greater than 3n[/quote]

No. Say a question asks is x > 3?

(1) x > 2. Is this sufficient to answer the question whether x is greater than 3? No. If x = 100, then we'd have an YES answer to the question but if x = 2.5 (so if x is any number from 2 to 3), then we'd have a NO answer to the question.

In a Yes/No Data Sufficiency questions, statement(s) is sufficient if the answer is “always yes” or “always no” while a statement(s) is insufficient if the answer is "sometimes yes" and "sometimes no".[/quote]


This explanation..... this is going to save lots of lives on the GMAT. Thank you Bunuel!
avatar
khan0210
Joined: 20 Jan 2017
Last visit: 18 Dec 2020
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
38
 [2]
Given Kudos: 107
Location: United Arab Emirates
Schools: Owen '22
Schools: Owen '22
Posts: 32
Kudos: 38
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is √(n+k)>2√n , yes/no?

Condition n>0 (I) k>0 (I) [n and k are positive integers]

Simplify:
(√(n+k) / √n)^2 > 2
n+k/n>4

n+k>4n

Therefore is k>3n... yes/no?
or
Is k>3 where the least possible value of n is 1
:. Possible values of k = 4,5,6....

St 1: k>3n ...Sufficient

Possible values of k= 4, 5, 6...

St 2: K>2n

possible values of k = 3,4,5....

Because K can be equal to 3 or greater than 3 it is not sufficient.
avatar
Zaer119
Joined: 07 Nov 2019
Last visit: 24 Mar 2022
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 37
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If n and k are positive integers, is \(\sqrt{n+k}>2\sqrt{n}\)?

Both parts of the inequality are positive, thus we can square it, to get "is \(n+k>4n\)?" --> is \(k>3n\)?

(1) k > 3n. Sufficient.

(2) n + k > 3n --> \(k>2n\). Not sufficient.

Answer: A.


How can you square both sides? I squared in some questions, and it turned out to be wrong. Could you please help me know in which questions I can square both the sides and which questions I cant.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 08 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,638
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88,214
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,638
Kudos: 684,245
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Raghav360
Bunuel
If n and k are positive integers, is \(\sqrt{n+k}>2\sqrt{n}\)?

Both parts of the inequality are positive, thus we can square it, to get "is \(n+k>4n\)?" --> is \(k>3n\)?

(1) k > 3n. Sufficient.

(2) n + k > 3n --> \(k>2n\). Not sufficient.

Answer: A.


How can you square both sides? I squared in some questions, and it turned out to be wrong. Could you please help me know in which questions I can square both the sides and which questions I cant.

We can raise both parts of an inequality to an even power if we know that both parts of an inequality are non-negative (the same for taking an even root of both sides of an inequality). Here both sides are under the square root, so non-negative, so we can square.

Adding, subtracting, squaring etc.: Manipulating Inequalities.
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 08 Dec 2024
Posts: 4,879
Own Kudos:
8,130
 [1]
Given Kudos: 224
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Posts: 4,879
Kudos: 8,130
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[b]Solution:[/b]

In any inequality, if the signs are same, we can square, cancel or cross multiply.
Here, both parts of the inequality are positive, we can square it and rephrase the question stem as
Is n + k > 4n ?
St (1):- k > 3n
Adding n on both sides n + k >3n (Sufficient)

St (2)
n + k > 3n
=> k>2n
This doesn’t tell us if n + k >4n (Insufficient)

Option (a)

Devmitra Sen
GMAT SME

User avatar
ayakik
Joined: 15 Sep 2022
Last visit: 31 Jan 2023
Posts: 9
Given Kudos: 9
GMAT 1: 610 Q36 V37
GMAT 2: 650 Q39 V41
GMAT 2: 650 Q39 V41
Posts: 9
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Bunuel I read through this read and I'm still having some trouble understanding one thing -- why does it matter that this question specifies "n and k are positive integers"? A value under a square root would always need to be positive anyway, and either way n must have the same sign on both sides, so why does it matter?
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 35,778
Own Kudos:
Posts: 35,778
Kudos: 928
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderator:
Math Expert
97638 posts