Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

OG C DS 144 If n is a positive integer, is (1/10)^n < .01? a. n>2 b. (1/10)^(n-1) <0.1

First lets make the question simpler... n is a postive integer....so n can be 1, 2, 3..... (1/10)^n < .01 ? ===> 10^-n < .01? ===== > 10^-n < 10^-2 ? so the question now becomes ----- > is 10 raised to -n less than 10 raised to -2

a. n > 2====> since n can only be an integer, lets take the value of n as 3. so, substitiuting n = 3,

10^-3 < 10^-2 i.e. 10^-3 IS less than 10^-2 .... so statement 1 is sufficient...

b. (1/10)^(n-1) <0.1 simplying statement 2 goes like this..:

(1/10)^(n-1) <0.1 =====> (10)^-(n-1) <0.1 ====>

(10)^-n+1 <0.1 =====> (10)^-n <0.01 ..ie. this is what the question was asking for...

Hoping someone can please shed some light on this as I'm seeing conflicting answers in different threads.

OG C DS 144 If n is a positive integer, is \(\frac{1}{10}^n < 0.01\)? a. \(n>2\) b. \(\frac{1}{10}^{n-1} < 0.1\)

Taking the stem, I change it to \(\frac{1}{10}^n < \frac{1}{100}\). For this to be true, n > 2. So the question is asking... is n > 2?

A. n > 2 Sufficient based on manipulation of stem.

B. \(\frac{1}{10}^{n-1} < 0.1\) This is where it gets really confusing. There are two ways I can go about doing this resulting in different answers...

Method 1 \(\frac{1}{10}^{n-1} < 0.1\) Change the bases into decimals. \(0.1^{n-1} < 0.1^1\) The bases on both sides of the inequality match, so I focus on the exponents: \(n-1 < 1\) \(n < 2\) This is sufficient, but this answer conflicts with A. From what I understand, this should never happen on the GMAT.

Method 2 \(\frac{1}{10}^{n-1} < 0.1\) Change the bases into whole numbers: \((10^{-1})^{n-1} < 10^{-1}\) Now that the bases are the same on both sides, I focus on the exponents: \(-1(n-1) < -1\) \(-n+1 < -1\) \(-n < -2\) \(n > 2\) This is sufficient and this answer agrees with A.

Method 2 is the explanation given in the OG. But why does Method 1 (my approach) give a different answer? What am I doing wrong?

Hoping someone can please shed some light on this as I'm seeing conflicting answers in different threads.

OG C DS 144 If n is a positive integer, is \(\frac{1}{10}^n < 0.01\)? a. \(n>2\) b. \(\frac{1}{10}^{n-1} < 0.1\)

Taking the stem, I change it to \(\frac{1}{10}^n < \frac{1}{100}\). For this to be true, n > 2. So the question is asking... is n > 2?

A. n > 2 Sufficient based on manipulation of stem.

B. \(\frac{1}{10}^{n-1} < 0.1\) This is where it gets really confusing. There are two ways I can go about doing this resulting in different answers...

Method 1 \(\frac{1}{10}^{n-1} < 0.1\) Change the bases into decimals. \(0.1^{n-1} < 0.1^1\) The bases on both sides of the inequality match, so I focus on the exponents: \(n-1 < 1\) \(n < 2\) This is sufficient, but this answer conflicts with A. From what I understand, this should never happen on the GMAT.

Method 2 \(\frac{1}{10}^{n-1} < 0.1\) Change the bases into whole numbers: \((10^{-1})^{n-1} < 10^{-1}\) Now that the bases are the same on both sides, I focus on the exponents: \(-1(n-1) < -1\) \(-n+1 < -1\) \(-n < -2\) \(n > 2\) This is sufficient and this answer agrees with A.

Method 2 is the explanation given in the OG. But why does Method 1 (my approach) give a different answer? What am I doing wrong?

Anyone? I'd really appreciate an explanation because clearly something is wrong with my logic.

Hoping someone can please shed some light on this as I'm seeing conflicting answers in different threads.

OG C DS 144 If n is a positive integer, is \(\frac{1}{10}^n < 0.01\)? a. \(n>2\) b. \(\frac{1}{10}^{n-1} < 0.1\)

Taking the stem, I change it to \(\frac{1}{10}^n < \frac{1}{100}\). For this to be true, n > 2. So the question is asking... is n > 2?

A. n > 2 Sufficient based on manipulation of stem.

B. \(\frac{1}{10}^{n-1} < 0.1\) This is where it gets really confusing. There are two ways I can go about doing this resulting in different answers...

Method 1 \(\frac{1}{10}^{n-1} < 0.1\) Change the bases into decimals. \(0.1^{n-1} < 0.1^1\) The bases on both sides of the inequality match, so I focus on the exponents: \(n-1 < 1\) \(n < 2\) This is sufficient, but this answer conflicts with A. From what I understand, this should never happen on the GMAT.

Method 2 \(\frac{1}{10}^{n-1} < 0.1\) Change the bases into whole numbers: \((10^{-1})^{n-1} < 10^{-1}\) Now that the bases are the same on both sides, I focus on the exponents: \(-1(n-1) < -1\) \(-n+1 < -1\) \(-n < -2\) \(n > 2\) This is sufficient and this answer agrees with A.

Method 2 is the explanation given in the OG. But why does Method 1 (my approach) give a different answer? What am I doing wrong?

Anyone? I'd really appreciate an explanation because clearly something is wrong with my logic.

GSD, the Method 2 deals with whole numbers, Method 1 is deals with decimals/fractions. A fraction raised to the (n+1) power is smaller than that same fraction raised to the n power (assuming n is positive), whereas a whole number raised to the (n+1) power is larger than that same number raised to the n power. That's why you're seeing the conflicting answers.

GSD, the Method 2 deals with whole numbers, Method 1 is deals with decimals/fractions. A fraction raised to the (n+1) power is smaller than that same fraction raised to the n power (assuming n is positive), whereas a whole number raised to the (n+1) power is larger than that same number raised to the n power. That's why you're seeing the conflicting answers.

Thank you for the response. Do you mind elaborating on this? I understand the concept that when you take any number between 0 and 1 and raise it to a power, the value will decrease. But I still don't understand how it matters in this particular context. The stem was not manipulated to use whole numbers as the base, so why does Method 2 (using whole numbers) arrive at the correct conflusion? Are there any general rules about flipping inequalities when dealing with numbers between 0 and 1?

(1) \(\frac{1}{10}^{n-1} < 0.1\) Change the bases into decimals. (2) \(0.1^{n-1} < 0.1^1\)

The bases on both sides of the inequality match, so I focus on the exponents: (3) \(n-1 < 1\)

Going from step (2) to step (3) is not logically or mathematically correct.

If: \(0.1^{n-1} < 0.1^1\) Then: n-1 > 1, since the higher the exponent of 0.1, the lower the resulting decimal.

For example, if n-1 WAS less than 1, you can see that \(0.1^{n-1} > 0.1^1\) If n-1 = 0, which is less than 1, then \(0.1^{0} = 1 > 0.1^1\) If n-1 = -1, which is less than 1, then \(0.1^{-1} = 10 > 0.1^1\) If n-1 = 1, which is greater than 1, then \(0.1^{-1} = .01 < 0.1^1\)

OG C DS 144 If n is a positive integer, is (1/10)^n < .01? a. n>2 b. (1/10)^(n-1) <0.1

(1) n is greater than 2 that is at least 3 so 1 is divided by 1000 (1/1000=.001) less than 0.01 suff. (2) if n=2 then left=right part, if n=3 then left part (.01) <0.1, n>2 suff.

There’s something in Pacific North West that you cannot find anywhere else. The atmosphere and scenic nature are next to none, with mountains on one side and ocean on...

This month I got selected by Stanford GSB to be included in “Best & Brightest, Class of 2017” by Poets & Quants. Besides feeling honored for being part of...

Joe Navarro is an ex FBI agent who was a founding member of the FBI’s Behavioural Analysis Program. He was a body language expert who he used his ability to successfully...