It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 04:09

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If p,s, and t are positive integers, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 25 Jun 2015
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 141

Schools: ISB '18
If p,s, and t are positive integers, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Dec 2015, 13:11
9
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

69% (01:12) correct 31% (01:44) wrong based on 320 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

If p,s, and t are positive integer, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)

(1) p < s
(2) s < t

need help to solve this one.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 141

Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2675

Kudos [?]: 1725 [4], given: 792

Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: Kellogg '18 (M)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Re: If p,s, and t are positive integers, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Dec 2015, 13:18
4
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
ajayvyavahare wrote:
If p,s, and t are positive integer, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)

(1) p < s
(2) s < t

need help to solve this one.

Do not forget to mention the source of the question.

it is simple after you realise that as p is positive, you can rewrite the given inequality as |ps-pt| > p(s-t) = p|s-t| > p(s-t) , you can also remove 'p' from both the sides , leaving you with

is |s-t| > s-t which is very clearly obtainable if you know about the relative relation between t and s (side note, not required for this question: for |s-t| > s-t to be true, this means that s-t<0 or s<t)

Statement 1, gives no information about relation between t and s , hence not sufficient.

Statement 2, gives the exact relation we need to answer the question and as such is sufficient.

B is the correct answer.

Hope this helps.
_________________

Thursday with Ron updated list as of July 1st, 2015: http://gmatclub.com/forum/consolidated-thursday-with-ron-list-for-all-the-sections-201006.html#p1544515
Rules for Posting in Quant Forums: http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-please-read-this-before-posting-133935.html
Writing Mathematical Formulae in your posts: http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-please-read-this-before-posting-133935.html#p1096628
GMATCLUB Math Book: http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-math-book-in-downloadable-pdf-format-130609.html
Everything Related to Inequalities: http://gmatclub.com/forum/inequalities-made-easy-206653.html#p1582891
Inequalities tips: http://gmatclub.com/forum/inequalities-tips-and-hints-175001.html
Debrief, 650 to 750: http://gmatclub.com/forum/650-to-750-a-10-month-journey-to-the-score-203190.html

Kudos [?]: 1725 [4], given: 792

Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 4142

Kudos [?]: 2899 [0], given: 0

GPA: 3.82
Re: If p,s, and t are positive integers, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Dec 2015, 05:43
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

If p,s, and t are positive integer, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)?

(1) p < s
(2) s < t

When you modify the condition and the question, |ps-pt| > p(s-t)?--> ps-pt<0?, therefore p(s-t)<0?. Since p>0, you need to find out s-t<0?. In 2), s-t<0, which is yes and sufficient. Therefore, the answer is B.

-> Once we modify the original condition and the question according to the variable approach method 1, we can solve approximately 30% of DS questions.
_________________

MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spare
The one-and-only World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy.
Find a 10% off coupon code for GMAT Club members.
“Receive 5 Math Questions & Solutions Daily”
Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons - try it yourself
See our Youtube demo

Kudos [?]: 2899 [0], given: 0

Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 4986

Kudos [?]: 5498 [0], given: 112

If p,s, and t are positive integers, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Dec 2015, 06:39
ajayvyavahare wrote:
If p,s, and t are positive integer, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)

(1) p < s
(2) s < t

need help to solve this one.

Hi,
the eq is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)..
or pls-tl > p(s-t)
since all numbers are positive , p cannot be 0..
two instances..
1) ls-tl will never be smaller than s-t as ls-tl will always be positive while s-t will depend on relative values of s and t..
2) if s and t are equal both will be 0..

so our answer for |ps-pt| > p(s-t) will be NO if s>t or s=t..
and it will be YES if s<t...
so we are just looking for the relation between s and t

lets see the statements..
(1) p < s...
nothing between s and t.. insuff

(2) s < t
answer is YES.. suff
ans B
_________________

Absolute modulus :http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html

Kudos [?]: 5498 [0], given: 112

Intern
Joined: 07 Sep 2016
Posts: 20

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 42

Location: Brazil
Concentration: Sustainability, International Business
Schools: Rotman '19 (S)
GMAT 1: 590 Q43 V28
GPA: 2.95
WE: Account Management (Commercial Banking)
Re: If p,s, and t are positive integers, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2016, 10:19
Engr2012 wrote:
ajayvyavahare wrote:
If p,s, and t are positive integer, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)

(1) p < s
(2) s < t

need help to solve this one.

Do not forget to mention the source of the question.

it is simple after you realise that as p is positive, you can rewrite the given inequality as |ps-pt| > p(s-t) = p|s-t| > p(s-t) , you can also remove 'p' from both the sides , leaving you with

is |s-t| > s-t which is very clearly obtainable if you know about the relative relation between t and s (side note, not required for this question: for |s-t| > s-t to be true, this means that s-t<0 or s<t)

Statement 1, gives no information about relation between t and s , hence not sufficient.

Statement 2, gives the exact relation we need to answer the question and as such is sufficient.

B is the correct answer.

Hope this helps.

I did exactly what you did in this question but picked E. I was thinking |x| is x or -x, so |s - t| can be equal to s-t or -(s-t). Plugging in some numbers for s and t: 3 - 5= -2 and -3 + 5 = 2, so |s-t| could be equal to 2 or -2 which would be insufficient. Could you help me to understand why this is wrong? Tks

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 42

Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2015
Posts: 209

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 105

Location: Canada
Concentration: Leadership, Accounting
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
GPA: 3.3
WE: Accounting (Accounting)
If p,s, and t are positive integers, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jan 2017, 13:12
AJ1012 wrote:
If p,s, and t are positive integer, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)

(1) p < s
(2) s < t

need help to solve this one.

Excellent question, this one looks a lot tricker than it actually is. Took me for a ride until I saw the "only positive integers". So let's look at |ps - pt| > P(s-t) or re-write it as | p(s-t)| > p (s-t).

Now let's consider a possibility where P(s-t) is greater than | p(s-t)| , think about this one. I can't come up with one. So there's no way | p(s-t | < p (s-t). We know that |p(s-t)| is always positive. So if p (s-t) is negative then, lets call P (s-t) x, so |x| > x is equal when both positive and |x| < x when x is negative correct?

Since all of them are positive, to make P (s-t) negative, T has to be bigger than S. That's the only option. No other way to make it negative since they're all positive. T > s is necessary. 1) insufficient. 2) sufficient !

Here's a easy way: re-write : |p (s-t)| > p(s-t) let call inside X. |x| > x only if X is negative. so if all are positive, (s-t) has to be negative. for that T has to be bigger than S. Bam!
_________________

Winners dont make excuses.

350--> 700

https://gmatclub.com/forum/700-q47-v39-ir-7-awa-246682.html

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 105

Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 319

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 88

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 550 Q42 V28
GPA: 3.96
WE: Human Resources (Retail Banking)
Re: If p,s, and t are positive integers, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2017, 09:30
in the problem we can take p as common as: |p(s-t)| > p(s-t) so now we need to look at the values of s and t and which tells only statement 2 so its suff. to get a exact yes. hence answer is B

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 88

Mannheim Thread Master
Status: It's now or never
Joined: 10 Feb 2017
Posts: 276

Kudos [?]: 27 [1], given: 51

Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q40 V39
GPA: 3
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: If p,s, and t are positive integers, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2017, 00:51
1
This post received
KUDOS
hi all, I still am unable to derive the relationship between the |s-t| > s-t. Can anyone please share an easier way to crack this. Thanks.
_________________

2017-2018 MBA Deadlines

Threadmaster for B-school Discussions
Class of 2019: Mannheim Business School
Class 0f 2020: HHL Leipzig

Kudos [?]: 27 [1], given: 51

Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Jul 2017
Posts: 252

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 60

Location: India
Re: If p,s, and t are positive integers, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2017, 05:21
If p,s, and t are positive integer, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)
=> Find is |p(s-t)| > p(s-t)

As we know |x| > x only when x is -ve . When x is positive |x| =x

So here we have to check if product p*(s-t) is -ve or not. => either p is -ve or (s-t) is -ve. If both -ve, than product will become +ve => |x|=x

given in question stem that all variables are +ve. So we have to find if (s-t) is -ve or not. => we have to find is s<t or not.

(1) p < s
This just tell value of p is less than s . Not sufficient.

(2) s < t
This directly gives us equation that we are looking for.
=> s<t => (s-t) is -ve => p(s-t) is -ve => |p(s-t)| > p(s-t)
Sufficient

Answer: B

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 60

Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2016
Posts: 202

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 38

Location: United States
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 3.4
Re: If p,s, and t are positive integers, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2017, 17:38
AnubhavK wrote:
hi all, I still am unable to derive the relationship between the |s-t| > s-t. Can anyone please share an easier way to crack this. Thanks.

Modulus is always positive or 0.

Hence |s-t| will always be positive or 0. In this problem it can be zero since s can be equal to t (there is nothing that says that these numbers are unique)

On the other hand, s-t will be positive if s>t and negative otherwise.

Statement 2 clearly tells us that s<t. This means that the RHS will be negative. Since LHS, i.e Modulus of any value is always positive, we can answer this question using statement B alone.
_________________

Kudosity killed the cat but your kudos can save it.

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 38

Re: If p,s, and t are positive integers, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)   [#permalink] 22 Sep 2017, 17:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# If p,s, and t are positive integers, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.