Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 25 Jun 2015
Posts: 6

If p,s, and t are positive integers, is pspt > p(st) [#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Dec 2015, 12:11
1
This post received KUDOS
10
This post was BOOKMARKED
Question Stats:
68% (01:10) correct 32% (01:38) wrong based on 391 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
If p,s, and t are positive integer, is pspt > p(st) (1) p < s (2) s < t need help to solve this one.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.



Current Student
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2685
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.7
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)

Re: If p,s, and t are positive integers, is pspt > p(st) [#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Dec 2015, 12:18
4
This post received KUDOS
2
This post was BOOKMARKED
ajayvyavahare wrote: If p,s, and t are positive integer, is pspt > p(st)
(1) p < s (2) s < t
need help to solve this one. Do not forget to mention the source of the question.it is simple after you realise that as p is positive, you can rewrite the given inequality as pspt > p(st) = pst > p(st) , you can also remove 'p' from both the sides , leaving you with is st > st which is very clearly obtainable if you know about the relative relation between t and s (side note, not required for this question: for st > st to be true, this means that st<0 or s<t)Statement 1, gives no information about relation between t and s , hence not sufficient. Statement 2, gives the exact relation we need to answer the question and as such is sufficient. B is the correct answer. Hope this helps.



Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 4715
GPA: 3.82

Re: If p,s, and t are positive integers, is pspt > p(st) [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Dec 2015, 04:43
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution. If p,s, and t are positive integer, is pspt > p(st)? (1) p < s (2) s < t When you modify the condition and the question, pspt > p(st)?> pspt<0?, therefore p(st)<0?. Since p>0, you need to find out st<0?. In 2), st<0, which is yes and sufficient. Therefore, the answer is B. > Once we modify the original condition and the question according to the variable approach method 1, we can solve approximately 30% of DS questions.
_________________
MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spare The oneandonly World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy. Find a 10% off coupon code for GMAT Club members. “Receive 5 Math Questions & Solutions Daily” Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons  try it yourself See our Youtube demo



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 5545

If p,s, and t are positive integers, is pspt > p(st) [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Dec 2015, 05:39
ajayvyavahare wrote: If p,s, and t are positive integer, is pspt > p(st)
(1) p < s (2) s < t
need help to solve this one. Hi, the eq is pspt > p(st).. or plstl > p(st) since all numbers are positive , p cannot be 0.. two instances.. 1) lstl will never be smaller than st as lstl will always be positive while st will depend on relative values of s and t.. 2) if s and t are equal both will be 0.. so our answer for pspt > p(st) will be NO if s>t or s=t.. and it will be YES if s<t... so we are just looking for the relation between s and tlets see the statements.. (1) p < s... nothing between s and t.. insuff (2) s < t answer is YES.. suff ans B
_________________
Absolute modulus :http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolutemodulusabetterunderstanding210849.html#p1622372 Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html
BANGALORE/



Intern
Joined: 07 Sep 2016
Posts: 20
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Sustainability, International Business
GPA: 2.95
WE: Account Management (Commercial Banking)

Re: If p,s, and t are positive integers, is pspt > p(st) [#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Oct 2016, 09:19
Engr2012 wrote: ajayvyavahare wrote: If p,s, and t are positive integer, is pspt > p(st)
(1) p < s (2) s < t
need help to solve this one. Do not forget to mention the source of the question.it is simple after you realise that as p is positive, you can rewrite the given inequality as pspt > p(st) = pst > p(st) , you can also remove 'p' from both the sides , leaving you with is st > st which is very clearly obtainable if you know about the relative relation between t and s (side note, not required for this question: for st > st to be true, this means that st<0 or s<t)Statement 1, gives no information about relation between t and s , hence not sufficient. Statement 2, gives the exact relation we need to answer the question and as such is sufficient. B is the correct answer. Hope this helps. I did exactly what you did in this question but picked E. I was thinking x is x or x, so s  t can be equal to st or (st). Plugging in some numbers for s and t: 3  5= 2 and 3 + 5 = 2, so st could be equal to 2 or 2 which would be insufficient. Could you help me to understand why this is wrong? Tks



Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2015
Posts: 220
Location: Canada
Concentration: Leadership, Accounting
GPA: 3
WE: Accounting (Accounting)

If p,s, and t are positive integers, is pspt > p(st) [#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Jan 2017, 12:12
1
This post received KUDOS
AJ1012 wrote: If p,s, and t are positive integer, is pspt > p(st)
(1) p < s (2) s < t
need help to solve this one. Excellent question, this one looks a lot tricker than it actually is. Took me for a ride until I saw the "only positive integers". So let's look at ps  pt > P(st) or rewrite it as  p(st) > p (st). Now let's consider a possibility where P(st) is greater than  p(st) , think about this one. I can't come up with one. So there's no way  p(st  < p (st). We know that p(st) is always positive. So if p (st) is negative then, lets call P (st) x, so x > x is equal when both positive and x < x when x is negative correct? Since all of them are positive, to make P (st) negative, T has to be bigger than S. That's the only option. No other way to make it negative since they're all positive. T > s is necessary. 1) insufficient. 2) sufficient ! Here's a easy way: rewrite : p (st) > p(st) let call inside X. x > x only if X is negative. so if all are positive, (st) has to be negative. for that T has to be bigger than S. Bam!
_________________
Winners dont make excuses.
350> 700 https://gmatclub.com/forum/700q47v39ir7awa246682.html



Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 317
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
GPA: 3.96
WE: Human Resources (Retail Banking)

Re: If p,s, and t are positive integers, is pspt > p(st) [#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Jan 2017, 08:30
in the problem we can take p as common as: p(st) > p(st) so now we need to look at the values of s and t and which tells only statement 2 so its suff. to get a exact yes. hence answer is B



Mannheim Thread Master
Status: It's now or never
Joined: 10 Feb 2017
Posts: 288
Location: India
GPA: 3
WE: Consulting (Consulting)

Re: If p,s, and t are positive integers, is pspt > p(st) [#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Aug 2017, 23:51
1
This post received KUDOS
hi all, I still am unable to derive the relationship between the st > st. Can anyone please share an easier way to crack this. Thanks.
_________________
20172018 MBA Deadlines
Threadmaster for Bschool Discussions Class of 2019: Mannheim Business School Class 0f 2020: HHL Leipzig



Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Jul 2017
Posts: 287

Re: If p,s, and t are positive integers, is pspt > p(st) [#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Sep 2017, 04:21
If p,s, and t are positive integer, is pspt > p(st) => Find is p(st) > p(st)
As we know x > x only when x is ve . When x is positive x =x
So here we have to check if product p*(st) is ve or not. => either p is ve or (st) is ve. If both ve, than product will become +ve => x=x
given in question stem that all variables are +ve. So we have to find if (st) is ve or not. => we have to find is s<t or not.
(1) p < s This just tell value of p is less than s . Not sufficient.
(2) s < t This directly gives us equation that we are looking for. => s<t => (st) is ve => p(st) is ve => p(st) > p(st) Sufficient
Answer: B



Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2016
Posts: 251
Location: United States
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 3.4

Re: If p,s, and t are positive integers, is pspt > p(st) [#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Sep 2017, 16:38
AnubhavK wrote: hi all, I still am unable to derive the relationship between the st > st. Can anyone please share an easier way to crack this. Thanks. Modulus is always positive or 0.Hence st will always be positive or 0. In this problem it can be zero since s can be equal to t (there is nothing that says that these numbers are unique) On the other hand, st will be positive if s>t and negative otherwise. Statement 2 clearly tells us that s<t. This means that the RHS will be negative. Since LHS, i.e Modulus of any value is always positive, we can answer this question using statement B alone.
_________________
Kudosity killed the cat but your kudos can save it.




Re: If p,s, and t are positive integers, is pspt > p(st)
[#permalink]
22 Sep 2017, 16:38






