Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

If r and s are consecutive even integers, is r greater than s?

Either s=r+2 or r=s+2. We are asked whether we have the second case: r=s+2 --> r>s.

(1) r + 2 and s - 2 are consecutive even integers --> s>r, because if r>s then r+2 and s-2 won't be consecutive even integers. Sufficient.

Or another way: stem says that the distance between r and s is 2. Now, if r>s then the distance between r+2 and s-2 would be 6 and they won't be consecutive as (1) states. Thus it must be true that r<s.

(2) r - 1 is not equal to s + 1 --> subtract 1 from both sides in r=s+2 --> r-1=s+1. Now, we are told that this is not true, hence r=s+2 is not true, which means that r>s is not true. So, s>r. Sufficient.

Re: If r and s are consecutive even integers, is r greater than [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Apr 2013, 05:30

Bunuel,

Could you help with the below confusion regarding your explanation:

In the question, it says "consecutive even integers" so those could be positive or negative, but in the answer part you have only taken into consideration the positive even integers.My doubt is the consecutive even integers could be negative also, and could possible change the final answer as E.

Could you help with the below confusion regarding your explanation:

In the question, it says "consecutive even integers" so those could be positive or negative, but in the answer part you have only taken into consideration the positive even integers.My doubt is the consecutive even integers could be negative also, and could possible change the final answer as E.

Please help to clarify.

Thanks!

In the solution above positive integers are not mentioned at all. Thus the reasoning holds true for any even r and s.
_________________

Re: If r and s are consecutive even integers, is r greater than [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Apr 2013, 05:54

Thanks, got my mistake.

In general: we should plugin both positive & negative consecutive integers if not explicitly mentioned in question, as negative consecutive integers (odd or even) are very well accepted in GMAT.

Re: If r and s are consecutive even integers, is r greater than [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Feb 2015, 10:17

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Re: If r and s are consecutive even integers, is r greater than [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Mar 2016, 06:24

Bunuel wrote:

If r and s are consecutive even integers, is r greater than s?

Either s=r+2 or r=s+2. We are asked whether we have the second case: r=s+2 --> r>s.

(1) r + 2 and s - 2 are consecutive even integers --> s>r, because if r>s then r+2 and s-2 won't be consecutive even integers. Sufficient.

Or another way: stem says that the distance between r and s is 2. Now, if r>s then the distance between r+2 and s-2 would be 6 and they won't be consecutive as (1) states. Thus it must be true that r<s.

(2) r - 1 is not equal to s + 1 --> subtract 1 from both sides in r=s+2 --> r-1=s+1. Now, we are told that this is not true, hence r=s+2 is not true, which means that r>s is not true. So, s>r. Sufficient.

If r and s are consecutive even integers, is r greater than s?

Either s=r+2 or r=s+2. We are asked whether we have the second case: r=s+2 --> r>s.

(1) r + 2 and s - 2 are consecutive even integers --> s>r, because if r>s then r+2 and s-2 won't be consecutive even integers. Sufficient.

Or another way: stem says that the distance between r and s is 2. Now, if r>s then the distance between r+2 and s-2 would be 6 and they won't be consecutive as (1) states. Thus it must be true that r<s.

(2) r - 1 is not equal to s + 1 --> subtract 1 from both sides in r=s+2 --> r-1=s+1. Now, we are told that this is not true, hence r=s+2 is not true, which means that r>s is not true. So, s>r. Sufficient.

Hi, Since you ask about Stat 1, let me concentrate on that part only.. 1) we know r and s are consecutive even integers.. Either r=s+2 or s=r+2..

2) from stat 1 r + 2 and s - 2 are consecutive even integers..

lets try two cases here.. a) r=s+2.. substitute in r+2= s+2+2= s+4.. NOW can s+4 and s-2 be consecutive even- NO so s=r+2 so s>r.. b) we can try s=r+2 too.. s-2=r+2-2=r... so s-2 and r+2 consecutive would mean r and r+2 consecutive even.. so yes s=r+2..

Re: If r and s are consecutive even integers, is r greater than [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Mar 2016, 06:58

chetan2u wrote:

smartguy595 wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

If r and s are consecutive even integers, is r greater than s?

Either s=r+2 or r=s+2. We are asked whether we have the second case: r=s+2 --> r>s.

(1) r + 2 and s - 2 are consecutive even integers --> s>r, because if r>s then r+2 and s-2 won't be consecutive even integers. Sufficient.

Or another way: stem says that the distance between r and s is 2. Now, if r>s then the distance between r+2 and s-2 would be 6 and they won't be consecutive as (1) states. Thus it must be true that r<s.

(2) r - 1 is not equal to s + 1 --> subtract 1 from both sides in r=s+2 --> r-1=s+1. Now, we are told that this is not true, hence r=s+2 is not true, which means that r>s is not true. So, s>r. Sufficient.

Hi, Since you ask about Stat 1, let me concentrate on that part only.. 1) we know r and s are consecutive even integers.. Either r=s+2 or s=r+2..

2) from stat 1 r + 2 and s - 2 are consecutive even integers..

lets try two cases here.. a) r=s+2.. substitute in r+2= s+2+2= s+4.. NOW can s+4 and s-2 be consecutive even- NO so s=r+2 so s>r.. b) we can try s=r+2 too.. s-2=r+2-2=r... so s-2 and r+2 consecutive would mean r and r+2 consecutive even.. so yes s=r+2..

Hope it helps

Thanks Chetan
_________________

"When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe, then you’ll be successful.” - Eric Thomas

I need to work on timing badly!!

gmatclubot

Re: If r and s are consecutive even integers, is r greater than
[#permalink]
06 Mar 2016, 06:58

Campus visits play a crucial role in the MBA application process. It’s one thing to be passionate about one school but another to actually visit the campus, talk...

Its been long time coming. I have always been passionate about poetry. It’s my way of expressing my feelings and emotions. And i feel a person can convey...

Marty Cagan is founding partner of the Silicon Valley Product Group, a consulting firm that helps companies with their product strategy. Prior to that he held product roles at...

Written by Scottish historian Niall Ferguson , the book is subtitled “A Financial History of the World”. There is also a long documentary of the same name that the...