It is currently 18 Oct 2017, 17:05

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If r and s are positive integers, is (r/s) an integer?

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2007
Posts: 198

Kudos [?]: 51 [1], given: 0

If r and s are positive integers, is (r/s) an integer? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Feb 2008, 14:31
1
KUDOS
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

This came up in my review, my answer was incorrect.

If r and s are positive integers, is (r/s) an integer?

(1) Every factor of s is also a factor of r.

(2) Every prime factor of s is also a prime factor of r.

Can you provide rationale as well?

Kudos [?]: 51 [1], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 12 Feb 2008
Posts: 177

Kudos [?]: 46 [1], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Feb 2008, 18:04
1
KUDOS
RyanDe680 wrote:
This came up in my review, my answer was incorrect.

If r and s are positive integers, is (r/s) an integer?

(1) Every factor of s is also a factor of r.

(2) Every prime factor of s is also a prime factor of r.

Can you provide rationale as well?

E - each statement is sufficient. here is my rational:

1 - if each factor of r is also a factor of s then when you break down the numbers into their factors you will cancel each other out and have an integer. actually this will probably yield to one.
2 - each number can be broken down to a set of prime factors. a number is either prime(divisible only by 1 and itself) or can be broken down into prime numbers. so the same thing here as with 1. all prime will cancel each other out and yield an integer.

what is the OA?

Kudos [?]: 46 [1], given: 0

Director
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 775

Kudos [?]: 172 [1], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Feb 2008, 20:36
1
KUDOS
Should be 'A'.

Stmt1: if every factor of s is a factor of r, r/s will yield an integer.
example: r=6, s =3
r=6, s=6

stmt2: r=6 s=12,
r=6, s=6

Kudos [?]: 172 [1], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 25 Feb 2008
Posts: 14

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Feb 2008, 20:49
since s is a factor of itself, based on statement (1), s is a factor of r which means r/s is a integer

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2007
Posts: 198

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Feb 2008, 06:22
The OA is A (statement 1 alone is sufficient).

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 05 Sep 2007
Posts: 41

Kudos [?]: 21 [1], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Feb 2008, 16:26
1
KUDOS
Not sure how the OA can be A...here's why I think it's E:

What is s is 4 and r is 6...what am I missing here?

Kudos [?]: 21 [1], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 12 Feb 2008
Posts: 177

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Feb 2008, 16:36
varunk wrote:
Not sure how the OA can be A...here's why I think it's E:

What is s is 4 and r is 6...what am I missing here?

every factor of s is a factor of r.
so the factors calncell each other out and you are left with an integer.
1 is suffic.
but why 2 is not suff.

any CEO here to shed some light?

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 1437

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 12

Schools: Chicago Booth '11

### Show Tags

28 Feb 2008, 17:09
(2) Every prime factor of s is also a prime factor of r.

2 is insufficient because consider s=4 r=10

prime factor of S is 2
prime factor of r is 5 and 2

so back to stat 2, every prime factor of S (which 2 is the only prime factor) is also a prime factor of R (which is 10) well 2 is prime factor of 10 as well

however 10/4 is not an integer

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 12

Intern
Joined: 25 Feb 2008
Posts: 14

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Feb 2008, 18:36
RyanDe680 wrote:
This came up in my review, my answer was incorrect.

If r and s are positive integers, is (r/s) an integer?

(1) Every factor of s is also a factor of r.

(2) Every prime factor of s is also a prime factor of r.

Can you provide rationale as well?

statement 1 - since s is a factor of itself, and every factor of s is a factor of r, statement 1 answers the question directly.

statement 2 - Example 4, 8 - ok. Example 4,6 - not ok. So not sufficient.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Posts: 535

Kudos [?]: 180 [1], given: 0

Schools: Stern, McCombs, Marshall, Wharton

### Show Tags

29 Feb 2008, 14:17
1
KUDOS
I get A as well.

Stmt 1: Every factor of s is also a factor of r.

All the factors of s in the denominator cancel with r in the numerator and since they are both positive integers your left with a positive integer.

Stmt 2: Every prime factor of s is also a prime factor of r.

Since we dont know anything about the non prime factors this is insuff.

For example r could be 12 and s could be 11.

Kudos [?]: 180 [1], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 20 Sep 2007
Posts: 106

Kudos [?]: 81 [1], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Mar 2008, 21:33
1
KUDOS

First statement sufficient as every factor of s is a factor of r as well so they cancel out to make an integer
Remember we cannot take example of r=6 and s=4 as somebody has taken previously as there are two factors of two in 4 but only one factor of 2 in 6.
Statement 2 insufficient
e.g r=9 and s=6
and r=9 and s=3

Kudos [?]: 81 [1], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 39

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2008, 07:30
I'm not a fan of this question. If, for example S = 12, its prime factorization is 2^2 * 3.

According to statement 2, EVERY prime factor of s (I took this to mean 2, 2, and 3 since it has two 2's, which are both prime factors). Basically I thought the trick was that you had to understand that for every integer, there is a prime factorization, and therefore the two statements were basically the same. I guess I misinterpreted (2), but still, how would you KNOW how to interpret that?

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1402

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

26 Sep 2008, 13:47
tamg08 wrote:
I'm not a fan of this question. If, for example S = 12, its prime factorization is 2^2 * 3.

According to statement 2, EVERY prime factor of s (I took this to mean 2, 2, and 3 since it has two 2's, which are both prime factors). Basically I thought the trick was that you had to understand that for every integer, there is a prime factorization, and therefore the two statements were basically the same. I guess I misinterpreted (2), but still, how would you KNOW how to interpret that?

What a worst coincidence! I did the same. I was looking for numbers that had the same prime factors. But I guess we are wrong.

Every prime factor of s is also a prime factor of r.

does not mean that every prime factor of s need not be a prime factor of r as many times in s. It can just be a subset of the numbers. as some said 4,8 good 4,6 not good

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 1

Re: DS question   [#permalink] 26 Sep 2008, 13:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by