It is currently 23 Jun 2017, 09:04

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If r is the remainder when the positive integer n is divided

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 29 Jun 2008
Posts: 37
If r is the remainder when the positive integer n is divided [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2008, 04:42
This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

If r is the remainder when the positive integer n is divided by 7, what is the value of r?
(1) When r is divided by 21, the remainder is an odd number.
(2) When n is divided by 28, the remainder is 3.

n = 7x + r

according to (1):
n = 21y + r1 (r1 is odd)
n = 7(3y) + r1
meaning the remainder while dividing by 21 and by 7 is the same odd number, but we don't have a way to find it.

according to (2):
n = 28y + 3
n = 7(4y) + 3
therefore r = 3, and (2) is sufficient.

Is my reasoning correct, is there a better way to explain it? Of course, we don't to explain in the GMAT, but I want to make sure my understanding is correct.
Current Student
Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Posts: 287
Schools: INSEAD Class of July '10
Re: remainder question - is my reasoning correct [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2008, 04:50
nirimblf wrote:
according to (1):
n = 21y + r1 (r1 is odd)
n = 7(3y) + r1
meaning the remainder while dividing by 21 and by 7 is the same odd number, but we don't have a way to find it.

Nope, r and r1 are not necessarily the same. Don't forget :
n = 7x + r, with r between 0 and 6 (inclusive)

n = 21y + r1, with r1 between 0 and 20 (inclusive)

We could have r1=17, which is odd and though r won't be equal to 17 then (but 17-2*7 = 3)

That being said, it its true that you don't know much about r1 and therefore don't know much about r (all you can say is that it is odd too, so r belongs to {1,3,5})

For instance :
n = 26 ==> r1 = 5 and r=5
n = 38 ==> r1 = 17 and r=3

==> (1) is insufficient

Last edited by Oski on 02 Jul 2008, 04:52, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 23 Jun 2008
Posts: 85
Location: Australia
Schools: AGSM '22
GMAT Date: 04-01-2014
Re: remainder question - is my reasoning correct [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2008, 04:51
nirimblf wrote:
If r is the remainder when the positive integer n is divided by 7, what is the value of r?
(1) When r is divided by 21, the remainder is an odd number.
(2) When n is divided by 28, the remainder is 3.

n = 7x + r

according to (1):
n = 21y + r1 (r1 is odd)
n = 7(3y) + r1
meaning the remainder while dividing by 21 and by 7 is the same odd number, but we don't have a way to find it.

well you really dont need to get into calculations here, we know r < 7 so the reminder of r/21 is "r" for sure and r being odd r can be 1,3,5 (NOT sufficient)

Quote:
according to (2):
n = 28y + 3
n = 7(4y) + 3
therefore r = 3, and (2) is sufficient.

good approach i think..

Quote:
Is my reasoning correct, is there a better way to explain it? Of course, we don't to explain in the GMAT, but I want to make sure my understanding is correct.

_________________

Kudos (+1) if you find this post helpful.

Intern
Joined: 29 Jun 2008
Posts: 37
Re: remainder question - is my reasoning correct [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2008, 04:59
Oski wrote:
nirimblf wrote:
according to (1):
n = 21y + r1 (r1 is odd)
n = 7(3y) + r1
meaning the remainder while dividing by 21 and by 7 is the same odd number, but we don't have a way to find it.

Nope, r and r1 are not necessarily the same. Don't forget :
n = 7x + r, with r between 0 and 6 (inclusive)

n = 21y + r1, with r1 between 0 and 20 (inclusive)

We could have r1=17, which is odd and though r won't be equal to 17 then (but 17-2*7 = 3)

That being said, it its true that you don't know much about r1 and therefore don't know much about r (all you can say is that it is odd too, so r belongs to {1,3,5})

For instance :
n = 26 ==> r1 = 5 and r=5
n = 38 ==> r1 = 17 and r=3

==> (1) is insufficient

So the reason we can move from
n = 28y + 3
to
n = 7(4y) + 3
and deduce the remainder is the same, is that 3 < 7 ?
Current Student
Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Posts: 287
Schools: INSEAD Class of July '10
Re: remainder question - is my reasoning correct [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2008, 05:14
1
KUDOS
nirimblf wrote:
So the reason we can move from
n = 28y + 3
to
n = 7(4y) + 3
and deduce the remainder is the same, is that 3 < 7 ?

Exactly
Re: remainder question - is my reasoning correct   [#permalink] 02 Jul 2008, 05:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by