It is currently 25 Sep 2017, 12:03

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra, she

Author Message
Director
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 775

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 0

If Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra, she [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2007, 04:32
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

If Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra, she would be famous. She is not a concert pianist since she is not famous.
The conclusion above is unsound because the author does not consider that
(A) Sarah could be a famous actress.
(B) Sarah could be a harpist for a major orchestra.
(C) Sarah could be a pianist with a rock group.
(D) Sarah could be a concert pianist with a minor orchestra.
(E) Sarah could be famous for another reason.

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 135

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2007, 04:37
that wasa tough one.
I go in for D

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 327

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2007, 06:38
(E) the author does not consider that Sarah could be famous for something else (i.e. actor, harpist, whatever...) cheers

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 591

Kudos [?]: 307 [0], given: 0

Location: Kuwait

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2007, 08:24
Using the cause-effect rule of CR:

X ---> Y can be weaken proving that it is possible: Z ---> Y OR Y ----> X

Kudos [?]: 307 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 639

Kudos [?]: 623 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2007, 11:20
My choice is B here...
concert pianist for a major orchestra = Famous
So, major orchestra is the prime concern, whereas B states that she could be a harpist

Kudos [?]: 623 [0], given: 6

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 365

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2007, 15:25
A, C, E are not relevant to the question.

sentence states if sarah were a pianist for major orchestra then she would be famous.

sentence concludes she is not pianist since she is not famous.

to be famous she would have to be with major orchestra.

the sentence does not take into account that she could be a pianist with a minor orchestra.

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Posts: 610

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Location: New Haven, CT

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2007, 16:43
D is definitely the answer. The last sentence assumes she is not famous and therefore not a concert pianist. However the first sentence uses the word "major". The author fails to realize that she may be a concert pianist in an orchestra that is not major and therefore not famous for that reason.

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Nov 2006
Posts: 349

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2007, 21:41
vshaunak@gmail.com wrote:
If Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra, she would be famous. She is not a concert pianist since she is not famous.
The conclusion above is unsound because the author does not consider that
(A) Sarah could be a famous actress.
(B) Sarah could be a harpist for a major orchestra.
(C) Sarah could be a pianist with a rock group.
(D) Sarah could be a concert pianist with a minor orchestra.
(E) Sarah could be famous for another reason.

(Stmt) If CPM then F.
(Ccsn) Not CP since not F.

The conclusion kind of restates the statement in its contrapositive way: "Not F then Not CPM". Nevertheless, what the conclusion states is not the exact contrapositive, but "Not F then Not CP". Therefore, the conclusion is unsound because what the statement specifically says is "If Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra". That is, the conclusion fails to address that Sarah could be a pianist for another sort of orchestra (minor, for example). It´s D.

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 775

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2007, 03:51
Thanks guys. OA is 'D'.

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 282

Kudos [?]: 137 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2007, 21:41
D makes sense to me. E is irrelevant.

Kudos [?]: 137 [0], given: 0

16 Jun 2007, 21:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by