It is currently 23 Jun 2017, 12:31

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 433
If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Nov 2006, 05:34
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city revenues will surely increase, since studies have conclusively shown that, if such parking regulations are put into effect, there is an increase in parking violations, and an increase in parking violations will result in a greater number of parking fines collected.

Which one of the following is closest, in terms of its logical features, to the reasoning used in the argument above?
(A) Last yearâ€™s increase in revenues can be easily explained. That was the year the city council instituted new parking regulations. No doubt the new law brought with it an increase in the number of parking violations.
(B) If taxes were increased, this act would naturally result in increased revenues for the city, and increased revenues would make some desirable social programs possible. So, if taxes were increased, some desirable social programs would become possible.
(C) Henry says that, if the city council goes into closed session, an important matter of personnel policy is being discussed. However, no personnel matters were discussed at the council meeting, so if Henry is right, the council did not go into closed session.
(D) All cars parked on the north side of the street were ticketed last night, and the same cars were towed away this morning. So beware! A car ticketed in this city also gets towed away.
(E) Allen says that, if the city council institutes new parking regulations, it is unlikely that revenues for the city will increase. If Allen is right, then the parking regulation plan should not be instituted.
VP
Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 1124
Schools: Chicago Booth
Re: CR - City Council [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Nov 2006, 05:40
arjsingh1976 wrote:
If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city revenues will surely increase, since studies have conclusively shown that, if such parking regulations are put into effect, there is an increase in parking violations, and an increase in parking violations will result in a greater number of parking fines collected.

Which one of the following is closest, in terms of its logical features, to the reasoning used in the argument above?
(A) Last yearâ€™s increase in revenues can be easily explained. That was the year the city council instituted new parking regulations. No doubt the new law brought with it an increase in the number of parking violations.
(B) If taxes were increased, this act would naturally result in increased revenues for the city, and increased revenues would make some desirable social programs possible. So, if taxes were increased, some desirable social programs would become possible.
(C) Henry says that, if the city council goes into closed session, an important matter of personnel policy is being discussed. However, no personnel matters were discussed at the council meeting, so if Henry is right, the council did not go into closed session.
(D) All cars parked on the north side of the street were ticketed last night, and the same cars were towed away this morning. So beware! A car ticketed in this city also gets towed away.
(E) Allen says that, if the city council institutes new parking regulations, it is unlikely that revenues for the city will increase. If Allen is right, then the parking regulation plan should not be instituted.

C)
A causes B and B causes C, therefore A causes C.
VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1016

Show Tags

02 Nov 2006, 05:49
I would bet on B.

It depends roughly on the same logic as argument:

_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

VP
Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 1124
Schools: Chicago Booth

Show Tags

02 Nov 2006, 05:53
ak_idc wrote:
I would bet on B.

It depends roughly on the same logic as argument:

I meant B, not C. Honestly, I did!
VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1445
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)

Show Tags

02 Nov 2006, 11:25
Another B from me..
Director
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 706

Show Tags

02 Nov 2006, 12:13
Yes B sounds good
Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 156

Show Tags

02 Nov 2006, 13:12
B follows the same pattern of logic.
Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 90

Show Tags

02 Nov 2006, 21:44
B for me 2
Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 745
Location: Dallas, Texas

Show Tags

02 Nov 2006, 23:19
The logial pattern is if A then B ; if B then C ; therefore if A then C

if parking regulations are put into effect, there is an increase in parking violations,
and if an increase in parking violations then a greater number of parking fines collected.

Therefore if parking regulations then more money from fine.

(B) If taxes were increased, this act would naturally result in increased revenues for the city,
if increased revenues then some desirable social programs possible.

Therefore if taxes were increased, some desirable social programs would become possible.
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

Director
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 524

Show Tags

03 Nov 2006, 14:19
Straight B.
Manager
Joined: 12 May 2006
Posts: 179
Re: CR - City Council [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Jun 2008, 08:21
Guys,

Can someone explain why A is not the answer as it also follows the same pattern.

New parking regulation => increase in parking violations => increased revenue
Manager
Joined: 01 May 2008
Posts: 110
Location: São Paulo
Re: CR - City Council [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Jun 2008, 14:55
Another B
Director
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 728
Re: CR - City Council [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 Jun 2008, 23:00
B,

anyone having OA/OE for this question?
Re: CR - City Council   [#permalink] 10 Jun 2008, 23:00
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city 24 08 Oct 2010, 15:51
If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city 10 12 Feb 2010, 20:42
2 The city council will certainly vote to approve the new 4 30 Jan 2008, 21:45
If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city 8 16 Sep 2007, 12:39
If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city 4 24 Jul 2007, 08:50
Display posts from previous: Sort by

If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.