It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 08:24

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If the forest continues to disappear at its present pace,

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 148

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

If the forest continues to disappear at its present pace, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2008, 04:21
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

“If the forest continues to disappear at its present pace, the koala will approach extinction,” said the biologist.

“So all that is needed to save the koala is to stop deforestation,” said the politician.

Which one of the following statements is consistent with the biologist’s claim but not with the politician’s claim?

(A) Deforestation continues and the koala becomes extinct.
(B) Deforestation is stopped and the koala becomes extinct.
(C) Reforestation begins and the koala survives.
(D) Deforestation is slowed and the koala survives.
(E) Deforestation is slowed and the koala approaches extinction.

Explanation pls
_________________

Neelabh Mahesh

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 18 May 2007
Posts: 54

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Koala extinction [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2008, 15:59
Is the Answer D?

(A) Deforestation continues and the koala becomes extinct.
consistent with biologist not with politician
(B) Deforestation is stopped and the koala becomes extinct.
consistent with biologist not with politician
(C) Reforestation begins and the koala survives.
not consistent with biologist and not consistent politician
(D) Deforestation is slowed and the koala survives.
consistent with biologist consistent with politician
(E) Deforestation is slowed and the koala approaches extinction.
consistent with biologist no consistent with politician

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Dec 2007
Posts: 95

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Koala extinction [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2008, 23:55
ill go for A

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 27 Jan 2008
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 0

Re: CR: Koala extinction [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2008, 17:28
1
KUDOS
I'll go for B

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 05 Sep 2007
Posts: 41

Kudos [?]: 21 [1], given: 0

Re: CR: Koala extinction [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Feb 2008, 19:07
1
KUDOS
What is the OA?

Kudos [?]: 21 [1], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 01 Aug 2007
Posts: 29

Kudos [?]: 8 [1], given: 0

Re: CR: Koala extinction [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2008, 01:35
1
KUDOS
bhatia_ash2002 wrote:
Is the Answer D?

(A) Deforestation continues and the koala becomes extinct.
consistent with biologist not with politician
(B) Deforestation is stopped and the koala becomes extinct.
consistent with biologist not with politician
(C) Reforestation begins and the koala survives.
not consistent with biologist and not consistent politician
(D) Deforestation is slowed and the koala survives.
consistent with biologist consistent with politician
(E) Deforestation is slowed and the koala approaches extinction.
consistent with biologist no consistent with politician

Shouldn't the answer be (E)? The question is asking for one that is consistent with biologist and not consistent with politician. I'm going with (E) - with the same reasoning as the above.

Kudos [?]: 8 [1], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3584

Kudos [?]: 4575 [0], given: 360

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Re: CR: Koala extinction [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2008, 04:16
B

“So all that is needed to save the koala is to stop deforestation,” said the politician.

(B) Deforestation is stopped and the koala becomes extinct. - only B contradicts directly politician.
_________________

HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android) - The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a must-have app especially if you aim at 700+ | PrepGame

Kudos [?]: 4575 [0], given: 360

Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 148

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Koala extinction [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2008, 05:32
walker wrote:
B

“So all that is needed to save the koala is to stop deforestation,” said the politician.

(B) Deforestation is stopped and the koala becomes extinct. - only B contradicts directly politician.

OA is B. but how is tht??
_________________

Neelabh Mahesh

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3584

Kudos [?]: 4575 [1], given: 360

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Re: CR: Koala extinction [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2008, 07:27
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
neelabhmahesh wrote:
OA is B. but how is tht??

Translate our problem to language of symbols

[x] - koala becomes extinct
not[x] - koala survives.
[p] - pace of forest disappearance
[pr] - present pace of forest disappearance

“If the forest continues to disappear at its present pace, the koala will approach extinction,” said the biologist.
“So all that is needed to save the koala is to stop deforestation,” said the politician.

the biologist: if [p]>=[pr] then [x]
the politician: if [p]=0 then not[x]

Which one of the following statements is consistent with the biologist’s claim but not with the politician’s claim?

the biologist: can be true
the politician: must be false

(A) Deforestation continues and the koala becomes extinct: [p]>0 (we don't know exactly a pace of deforestation) and not[x]: the biologist: can be true; the politician: can be true
(B) Deforestation is stopped and the koala becomes extinct: [p]=0 and [x]: the biologist: can be true; the politician: false
(C) Reforestation begins and the koala survives: [p]<0 and not[x]: the biologist: can be true; the politician: can be true
(D) Deforestation is slowed and the koala survives: [pr]>[p]>0 and not[x]: the biologist: can be true; the politician: true
(E) Deforestation is slowed and the koala approaches extinction. [pr]>[p]>0 and [x]: the biologist: can be true; the politician:can be true

Looks terrible but hope it help
_________________

HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android) - The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a must-have app especially if you aim at 700+ | PrepGame

Kudos [?]: 4575 [1], given: 360

Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 114

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Koala extinction [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2008, 23:27
Walker: i thought the question was quite simple until you pulled your math moves...I got 'lost in translation'
when I see equations, my mind shuts off...because of you, I can't do any more gmat tonight
+1 for making me go to bed

walker wrote:
neelabhmahesh wrote:
OA is B. but how is tht??

Translate our problem to language of symbols

[x] - koala becomes extinct
not[x] - koala survives.
[p] - pace of forest disappearance
[pr] - present pace of forest disappearance

“If the forest continues to disappear at its present pace, the koala will approach extinction,” said the biologist.
“So all that is needed to save the koala is to stop deforestation,” said the politician.

the biologist: if [p]>=[pr] then [x]
the politician: if [p]=0 then not[x]

Which one of the following statements is consistent with the biologist’s claim but not with the politician’s claim?

the biologist: can be true
the politician: must be false

(A) Deforestation continues and the koala becomes extinct: [p]>0 (we don't know exactly a pace of deforestation) and not[x]: the biologist: can be true; the politician: can be true
(B) Deforestation is stopped and the koala becomes extinct: [p]=0 and [x]: the biologist: can be true; the politician: false
(C) Reforestation begins and the koala survives: [p]<0 and not[x]: the biologist: can be true; the politician: can be true
(D) Deforestation is slowed and the koala survives: [pr]>[p]>0 and not[x]: the biologist: can be true; the politician: true
(E) Deforestation is slowed and the koala approaches extinction. [pr]>[p]>0 and [x]: the biologist: can be true; the politician:can be true

Looks terrible but hope it help

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3584

Kudos [?]: 4575 [0], given: 360

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Re: CR: Koala extinction [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Feb 2008, 01:41
jay02 wrote:
Walker: i thought the question was quite simple until you pulled your math moves...I got 'lost in translation'
when I see equations, my mind shuts off...because of you, I can't do any more gmat tonight
+1 for making me go to bed

_________________

HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android) - The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a must-have app especially if you aim at 700+ | PrepGame

Kudos [?]: 4575 [0], given: 360

Re: CR: Koala extinction   [#permalink] 12 Feb 2008, 01:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# If the forest continues to disappear at its present pace,

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.