dimitri92 wrote:
If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?
(1) n has exactly two positive factors.
(2) The difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd.
Given: Integer n is greater than 1 Target question: Does n = 2? Statement 1: n has exactly two positive factors. In other words, statement 1 tells us that
n is primeThere are several values of n that satisfy statement 1. Here are two:
Case a: n COULD equal 2, since 2 has exactly two positive factors: 1 and 2. In this case, the answer to the target question is
YES, n equals 2Case b: n COULD equal 3, since 3 has exactly two positive factors: 1 and 3. In this case, the answer to the target question is
NO, n does NOT equal 2 Since we cannot answer the
target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: The difference of any two distinct positive factors of n is odd.Nice!!!!
Since n is greater than 1, we know that
n has at least 2 factors.
We also know that
1 is a factor of ALL positive integers, AND we know that
n is also a factor of n Some important rules:
#1. ODD +/- ODD = EVEN
#2. ODD +/- EVEN = ODD
#3. EVEN +/- ODD = ODD
#4. EVEN +/- EVEN = EVEN
Statement 2 indirectly tells us than n - 1 must be ODD
Since 1 is ODD,
Rule #3 tells us that
n must be EVENIf n is EVEN, then 2 is one of the factors of n.
So far we know two of the factors of n:
1 and 2At this point, we can conclude that
1 and 2 are the ONLY factors of n (that is, n = 2)
How can we can we conclude this?
We already know that 1 (ODD) and 2 (EVEN) are factors of n.
If there existed another factor of n, that factor would have to be EVEN or ODD
If that factor were ODD, then the difference between that number and 1 (ODD) would be EVEN, and this betrays statement 2.
If that factor were EVEN, then the difference between that number and 2 (EVEN) would be EVEN, and this betrays statement 2.
So, we can be certain that 1 and 2 are the ONLY factors of n, which means n = 2.
The answer to the target question is
YES, n equals 2Since we can answer the
target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT
Answer: B
Cheers,
Brent
Without adding the information from statement 1 aren't we keeping the possibility of N to also be a non-prime no for example
eg N can be 4 as 4 - 1 =3 ( ODD ) As both 1 and 4 are distinct factors of N ( 1, 2 and 4 ) are the distinct factors of N ie 4
also as per your solution, 2 is the value of N as 2 and 1 are the factors... we can only conclude this provided we know N is a prime number and that can only happen when we combine both statements? PLease explain where is my thought process going wrong?