It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 13:08

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

If the salary cap of the National Basketball Association

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3345

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 2

Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
If the salary cap of the National Basketball Association [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2005, 17:20
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

If the salary cap of the National Basketball Association were to be removed, the cost of running a championship team would increase by at least two million dollars or more.


If the salary cap of the National Basketball Association were to be removed, the cost of running a championship team would increase by at least two million dollars or more

Were the salary cap of the National Basketball Association to be removed, the cost of running a championship team would increase by at least two million dollars

Was the salary cap of the National Basketball Association to be removed, the cost of running a championship team would increase by at least two million dollars or more

If the salary cap of the National Basketball Association was removed, the cost of running a championship team would increase by at least two million dollars

Should the salary cap of the National Basketball Association be removed, the cost of running a championship team would increase by at least two million dollars or more

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 2

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Oct 2004
Posts: 122

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2005, 21:09
I choose B.
... increase by at least two million dollars or more sounds redundant.

Last edited by kdhong on 21 Jun 2005, 21:27, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1706

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2005, 21:26
Agree with B. E is also likely but has redundent: ... $2bn and more.

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2005
Posts: 270

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Re: SC [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2005, 23:19
A, C and E can be eliminated because 'or more' is redundant after 'at least'.
B & D both sound correct to me...B sounds better...but it'd be great if someone could give a reason for why one of the two is better than the other

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 666

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jun 2005, 05:08
Yes it looks like B....Subjunctive is what is happening here

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1480

Kudos [?]: 426 [0], given: 0

Location: Germany
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jun 2005, 06:30
the sentence consists of a main and a conditional clause. the conditional clause must contain "were" because it is the 2nd form of conditional, which describes unlikely situations. the main clause must contain "would". A) is indeed wrong because of redundancy.
_________________

If your mind can conceive it and your heart can believe it, have faith that you can achieve it.

Kudos [?]: 426 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1706

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 0

Re: SC [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jun 2005, 06:52
Which one is better? Be careful, i have modified E.

If the salary cap of the National Basketball Association were to be removed, the cost of running a championship team would increase by at least two million dollars or more.


B. Were the salary cap of the National Basketball Association to be removed, the cost of running a championship team would increase by at least two million dollars

E. Should the salary cap of the National Basketball Association be removed, the cost of running a championship team would increase by at least two million dollars

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 716

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jun 2005, 10:46
I will go with D on this.

I am not very sure but here is what I read.

If things described in subjunctive mood are impossible and hypothetical, then "were" or "had" will be used.

But if things described in subjunctive mood are possible, then "was" can be used and is grammatically correct.

If you look at the answer choices "were and to be" do not go along well.

E looks impressive but I dont think it is grammtically correct because of atleast and more...

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

Current Student
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3345

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 2

Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jun 2005, 13:50
OA is B

the rule of subjunctive applies...

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 2

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 286

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jun 2005, 05:45
I am quite confused with sujunctive moods and if. Can someone please explain when are they applied & when are they not. Eg. in the following why is it not applied?

A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the caribou into northern Minnesota will fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is greater than one wolf for every 39 square miles.

Shouldn't it be "if the density ... were greater than"??

Kindly explain.

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 May 2005
Posts: 373

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jun 2005, 22:01
"at least ... or more" is redundant.

D is wrong because of tense mix-up.

B for me

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 894

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jun 2005, 06:47
I disagree with the OA.
B sounds awkward.
A reads better.
What is the source of this quesiton pls.

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 27 Jun 2005, 06:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by

If the salary cap of the National Basketball Association

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.