Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 28 May 2017, 16:36

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If the sum of n consecutive positive integers is 33, what of

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Status: Preparing Apps
Joined: 04 Mar 2009
Posts: 91
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 230 [1] , given: 4

If the sum of n consecutive positive integers is 33, what of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Dec 2010, 07:58
1
KUDOS
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

56% (02:26) correct 44% (01:55) wrong based on 277 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

If the sum of n consecutive positive integers is 33, what of the following could be the value of n?

I. 3
II. 6
III. 11

A. I only
B. II only
C. III only
D. I and II
E. I, II and III
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Intern
Joined: 30 Nov 2010
Posts: 31
Location: Boston
Schools: Boston College, MIT, BU, IIM, UCLA, Babson, Brown
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [4] , given: 10

Re: #37 sum of consecutive integers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Dec 2010, 09:06
4
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I think I used a better way..

u have 3 options so test for each option

1st option is 3. So n + n+1 + n+2 = 33. so u get 3n + 3 = 33. n = 10. So 3 works.

2nd option is 6. so n + n+1 + n+2 + n+3 + n+4 + n+5 = 33. 6n + 15 + 33. n = 3. So 6 works .

3rd option. We can clearly see through common sense that this option doesnt work as the last 3 least possible consecutive number 9 10 and 11 gives u 30 already.

I think if you are quick it should take less than a minute easily and u can use this standard form for similar problems.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39037
Followers: 7750

Kudos [?]: 106472 [2] , given: 11626

Re: #37 sum of consecutive integers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Dec 2010, 09:21
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
walkerme13 wrote:
I think I used a better way..

u have 3 options so test for each option

1st option is 3. So n + n+1 + n+2 = 33. so u get 3n + 3 = 33. n = 10. So 3 works.

2nd option is 6. so n + n+1 + n+2 + n+3 + n+4 + n+5 = 33. 6n + 15 + 33. n = 3. So 6 works .

3rd option. We can clearly see through common sense that this option doesnt work as the last 3 least possible consecutive number 9 10 and 11 gives u 30 already.

I think if you are quick it should take less than a minute easily and u can use this standard form for similar problems.

Yes, you can use a variable to express sequence of consecutive integers, though it's better to use some other than n as n is already used for # of terms:

x+(x+1)+(x+2)=33 --> x=10;
x+(x+1)+(x+2)+(x+3)+(x+4)+(x+5)=33 --> x=3;
x+(x+1)+(x+2)+...+(x+10)=33 --> x=-2, not possible as we are told that the sequence contains positive integers only.
_________________
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39037
Followers: 7750

Kudos [?]: 106472 [1] , given: 11626

Re: #37 sum of consecutive integers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Dec 2010, 08:37
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
aalriy wrote:
If the sum of $$n$$ consecutive positive integers is 33, what of the following could be the value of $$n$$?
I. 3
II. 6
III. 11

A. I only
B. II only
C. III only
D. I and II
E. I, II and III

You can solve this question with some formulas but trial and error will give an answer in less than 1 min.

Can n equal to 3? It's easy to find that 10+11+12=33, so yes;
Can n equal to 6? Again it's easy to find that 3+4+5+6+7+8=33, so yes;
Can n equal to 11? If we take the smallest 11 consecutive positive integers: 1, 2, 3, ..., 10, 11 we'll see that 11+10+9+8 is already more than 33, so n can not equal to 11.

_________________
Intern
Joined: 30 Nov 2010
Posts: 31
Location: Boston
Schools: Boston College, MIT, BU, IIM, UCLA, Babson, Brown
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [1] , given: 10

Re: #37 sum of consecutive integers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Dec 2010, 09:30
1
KUDOS
yes. you are right using x would avoid confusion. But I wonder if this method is good for higher numbers. number of integers more than 15 etc. but i dont think they would ask such questions so we are safe.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39037
Followers: 7750

Kudos [?]: 106472 [1] , given: 11626

Re: #37 sum of consecutive integers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 May 2013, 04:14
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
yezz wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
walkerme13 wrote:
I think I used a better way..

u have 3 options so test for each option

1st option is 3. So n + n+1 + n+2 = 33. so u get 3n + 3 = 33. n = 10. So 3 works.

2nd option is 6. so n + n+1 + n+2 + n+3 + n+4 + n+5 = 33. 6n + 15 + 33. n = 3. So 6 works .

3rd option. We can clearly see through common sense that this option doesnt work as the last 3 least possible consecutive number 9 10 and 11 gives u 30 already.

I think if you are quick it should take less than a minute easily and u can use this standard form for similar problems.

Yes, you can use a variable to express sequence of consecutive integers, though it's better to use some other than n as n is already used for # of terms:

x+(x+1)+(x+2)=33 --> x=10;
x+(x+1)+(x+2)+(x+3)+(x+4)+(x+5)=33 --> x=3;
x+(x+1)+(x+2)+...+(x+10)=33 --> x=-2, not possible as we are told that the sequence contains positive integers only.

Hi Bunuel , i used x-1,x,x+1 and it didnt work it gives rise to 3x=33?? where am i going wrong if u plz.

Nothing wrong: x=11 --> x-1=10 (the lowest of the tree integers). The same result as I have in my post.
_________________
Senior Manager
Status: Bring the Rain
Joined: 17 Aug 2010
Posts: 402
Location: United States (MD)
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.13
WE: Corporate Finance (Aerospace and Defense)
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 46

Re: #37 sum of consecutive integers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Dec 2010, 09:23
Good question.

Thanks for the explanation.
_________________
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39037
Followers: 7750

Kudos [?]: 106472 [0], given: 11626

Re: #37 sum of consecutive integers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Dec 2010, 09:43
walkerme13 wrote:
yes. you are right using x would avoid confusion. But I wonder if this method is good for higher numbers. number of integers more than 15 etc. but i dont think they would ask such questions so we are safe.

This method is perfectly OK with higher # of terms. For example: the sum of 25 consecutive numbers is 500, what is the first number?

Consecutive numbers can be expressed not only as x, x+1, x+2, ... but also ..., x-2, x-1, x, x+1, x+2, ...

So, 25 consecutive integers can be expressed as x-12, x-11, ..., x-1, x, x+1, ..., x+12 --> when we add them up we'll have: (x-12)+(x-11)+...+(x-1)+x+(x+1)+...+(x+12)=500 --> 25x=500 --> x=20 --> first # is x-12=8.

Of course you can use AP formulas as well for such kind of questions, check this: math-number-theory-88376.html and this: sequences-progressions-101891.html for more in this topic.

Hope it helps.
_________________
SVP
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 1747
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 358 [0], given: 49

Re: #37 sum of consecutive integers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 May 2013, 04:06
Bunuel wrote:
walkerme13 wrote:
I think I used a better way..

u have 3 options so test for each option

1st option is 3. So n + n+1 + n+2 = 33. so u get 3n + 3 = 33. n = 10. So 3 works.

2nd option is 6. so n + n+1 + n+2 + n+3 + n+4 + n+5 = 33. 6n + 15 + 33. n = 3. So 6 works .

3rd option. We can clearly see through common sense that this option doesnt work as the last 3 least possible consecutive number 9 10 and 11 gives u 30 already.

I think if you are quick it should take less than a minute easily and u can use this standard form for similar problems.

Yes, you can use a variable to express sequence of consecutive integers, though it's better to use some other than n as n is already used for # of terms:

x+(x+1)+(x+2)=33 --> x=10;
x+(x+1)+(x+2)+(x+3)+(x+4)+(x+5)=33 --> x=3;
x+(x+1)+(x+2)+...+(x+10)=33 --> x=-2, not possible as we are told that the sequence contains positive integers only.

Hi Bunuel , i used x-1,x,x+1 and it didnt work it gives rise to 3x=33?? where am i going wrong if u plz.
Intern
Joined: 22 Dec 2014
Posts: 6
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 14

Re: If the sum of n consecutive positive integers is 33, what of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jan 2015, 11:56
Thank for the posot. What confuses me is that one approach works for some numbers, while other for others. Exa, for 3 and 6 you can use x, x+1, etc and come up with 3x + 3 =33, and 6x + 15= 33, which gives you x=10, x= 3 =. OK.

But what happens with same rule for n=11? there we have to come up with dif approach: none of the approach above seems to work for me ( help me where I may be wrong ).
Using x-5, x-4, for n=11 doesnt work for me, neither the 11 n + N, which gives x<0 as properly indicated by Brunel above This n=11 is the most time consuming option to evaluate.

Is there any more general approach?
Thaks guys for great help!
Nelson
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 9125
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Followers: 445

Kudos [?]: 2876 [0], given: 169

Re: If the sum of n consecutive positive integers is 33, what of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jan 2015, 16:59
Hi nelson1972,

You seem comfortable with how the approach proves that N COULD be 3 or 6. The approach will also help you to prove that N CANNOT be 11.

Using the same logic...the 11 terms would be...
X
X+1
X+2
.....
X+10

The sum would be...
11X + 55

With the restriction that the sum of the terms MUST = 33 AND that all 11 terms MUST be POSITIVE INTEGERS.....

Does this equation have a solution:
11X + 55 = 33

11X = - 22
X = -2

However, we're told that the terms MUST be POSITIVE INTEGERS, so there CAN'T be 11 terms (the first 3 terms in THIS sequence would be -2, -1 and 0 which doesn't match the "restrictions"). This work helps to eliminate this option.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
_________________

760+: Learn What GMAT Assassins Do to Score at the Highest Levels
Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.com

# Rich Cohen

Co-Founder & GMAT Assassin

# Special Offer: Save \$75 + GMAT Club Tests

60-point improvement guarantee
www.empowergmat.com/

***********************Select EMPOWERgmat Courses now include ALL 6 Official GMAC CATs!***********************

Director
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 584
Schools: Cambridge'16
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 41

Re: If the sum of n consecutive positive integers is 33, what of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jan 2015, 23:21
We have consecutive integer, so their sum is the average multiplyied by N. Average=median in consecutive sets

N=3 means that average and median is 11, so set it 10,11,12 and sum is 33 (possible)

N=6 means that median is between 5 and 6 giving by itself 11, so it is 3,4,5,6,7,8 and sum is 33 (possible)

N=11 means that average and median is 3, so set can be only 1,2,3,4,5 or even shorter and never sum is 33
(impossible)

D
CEO
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2509
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Stanford '19 (D)
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 344 [0], given: 169

Re: If the sum of n consecutive positive integers is 33, what of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Jan 2016, 19:12
solved it the way bunuel explained, although took some time to arrive to the answer choice.
3 -> 10+11+12=33.
6 ->3+4+5+6+7+8=33.
11 -> since we are told that we have a set of n consecutive POSITIVE numbers, we can have the smallest possible numbers:
1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11 - the sum is way over 33, it is actually 11*12/2 = 11*6=66.

thus, only I and II works. the answer is D
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 15501
Followers: 651

Kudos [?]: 210 [0], given: 0

Re: If the sum of n consecutive positive integers is 33, what of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Mar 2017, 22:20
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Director
Joined: 07 Dec 2014
Posts: 672
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 3

Re: If the sum of n consecutive positive integers is 33, what of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Mar 2017, 12:23
aalriy wrote:
If the sum of n consecutive positive integers is 33, what of the following could be the value of n?

I. 3
II. 6
III. 11

A. I only
B. II only
C. III only
D. I and II
E. I, II and III

one approach is to divide the sum by the choices for n
if both are odd or both even, the quotient gives the middle term: 33/3=11
if odd/even or even/odd, the quotient gives the median: 33/6=5.5
33/11 gives 3, which clearly won't work as either a middle term or median
D
Senior Manager
Status: Choice is yours... Complain Or Fight..
Joined: 03 Jul 2016
Posts: 261
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Schools: IIMB
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 38

If the sum of n consecutive positive integers is 33, what of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2017, 06:34
Bunuel wrote:
aalriy wrote:
If the sum of $$n$$ consecutive positive integers is 33, what of the following could be the value of $$n$$?
I. 3
II. 6
III. 11

A. I only
B. II only
C. III only
D. I and II
E. I, II and III

You can solve this question with some formulas but trial and error will give an answer in less than 1 min.

Can n equal to 3? It's easy to find that 10+11+12=33, so yes;
Can n equal to 6? Again it's easy to find that 3+4+5+6+7+8=33, so yes;
Can n equal to 11? If we take the smallest 11 consecutive positive integers: 1, 2, 3, ..., 10, 11 we'll see that 11+10+9+8 is already more than 33, so n can not equal to 11.

Another approach:

33 is an odd number.

I. 3 --> even + odd + even = odd. This option can result in sum- 33 an odd number. So this COULD BE the value of N.
II. 6 --> for consecutive integers, obviously we will have 3 even + 3 odd numbers = Odd number ==> Possible.

III. 11 --> being such a large number. Least possible option is that the it will be first 11 integers, but first 11 integers sum up to - $$\frac{(11*12)}{2} = 66$$ Not possible.
If the sum of n consecutive positive integers is 33, what of   [#permalink] 29 Mar 2017, 06:34
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
13 If the sum of the first n positive odd integers is n^2, what is the su 5 18 Mar 2017, 13:35
14 If the sum of five consecutive positive integers is A 8 01 Mar 2017, 18:24
17 What is the value of n if the sum of the consecutive odd 6 26 Oct 2016, 12:03
33 If the sum of the first n positive integers is S, what is 11 09 Jan 2017, 20:02
56 If the sum of the consecutive integers from –42 to n 42 13 Apr 2017, 18:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by