Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

There is no big flaws, but it is not fully mathematically correct. When opening the absolute value you should add constraints which you use. In other words, \(|x|=x\) if \(x>=0\)

So, the precise solution is as follows:

\(|x|=3x-2\)

\(x=3x-2 , x>=0\) \(-x=3x-2, x<0\)

\(2x=2, x>=0\) \(4x=2, x<0\)

\(x=1, x>=0\) \(x=0.5, x<0\)

So, the only answer is x=1. Good luck! Try to solve some more problems with absolute values (both equations and inequalities)
_________________

If my post is useful for you not be ashamed to KUDO me! Let kudo each other!

Came across this rather interesting quant question, and thought of sharing it with folks here:

|x| = 3x - 2

a. 1 b. 1/2 c. 1 and 1/2 d. -1/2 e. -1

I know it's fun to solve when you know what you are doing (and more importantly, why you are doing it) and the graph method is especially satisfying but don't forget a very basic trick in such questions. When you have values for x in the options, and an equation in the question, we could just plug the values in. Since x = 1 satisfies the equation and x = 1/2 doesn't, answer has to be (A).
_________________

I know it's fun to solve when you know what you are doing (and more importantly, why you are doing it) and the graph method is especially satisfying but don't forget a very basic trick in such questions. When you have values for x in the options, and an equation in the question, we could just plug the values in. Since x = 1 satisfies the equation and x = 1/2 doesn't, answer has to be (A).

Wow thanks, you are correct i had overlooked this option.. do you think such questions will come in the real gmat, where plugging the value may reveal the answer?

I know it's fun to solve when you know what you are doing (and more importantly, why you are doing it) and the graph method is especially satisfying but don't forget a very basic trick in such questions. When you have values for x in the options, and an equation in the question, we could just plug the values in. Since x = 1 satisfies the equation and x = 1/2 doesn't, answer has to be (A).

Wow thanks, you are correct i had overlooked this option.. do you think such questions will come in the real gmat, where plugging the value may reveal the answer?

Just another simple approach. Since |x| is always positive so 3x - 2 should always be positive for this equation to be true. You can simply rule out options (D) and (E), as any negative values of x will make 3x-2 negative. For 1/2, again 3x-2 becomes negative. So only option left is (A).

Wow thanks, you are correct i had overlooked this option.. do you think such questions will come in the real gmat, where plugging the value may reveal the answer?

Thanks.

Sure it is possible. That is why it is good to keep this in mind since a relatively tricky question can be easily solved this way. Though, GMAC is wise to such tricks and since these questions don't involve much work on your part, don't expect the options to help you often (nevertheless, you should always keep one eye on the options), at least not right in the beginning. If you do get such a question, it may not be a very high level question.
_________________

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

There’s something in Pacific North West that you cannot find anywhere else. The atmosphere and scenic nature are next to none, with mountains on one side and ocean on...

This month I got selected by Stanford GSB to be included in “Best & Brightest, Class of 2017” by Poets & Quants. Besides feeling honored for being part of...

Joe Navarro is an ex FBI agent who was a founding member of the FBI’s Behavioural Analysis Program. He was a body language expert who he used his ability to successfully...