Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

1. leads to x = 2by + 4, it is insufficient however, take y < 4 with 2y > 4

2. lead to x+y = cy + 4 => x = (c+1) y + 4 in this case because 4 is said to be reminder after dividing by y, y cannot be less then 4.

Thus 2 is sufficient, 1 is not.

I did get answer B. But I approached it be inserting numbers, which took a while. I did not follow the above explanation. Can you please restate how 2 is sufficient from above.

I did get answer B. But I approached it be inserting numbers, which took a while. I did not follow the above explanation. Can you please restate how 2 is sufficient from above.

2 means that x can be represented in the form a*y + r and 0 <= (r = 4) < y, those two together mean that r=4 will be a reminder x/y

Last edited by Tyr on 22 Apr 2005, 16:57, edited 1 time in total.

Statement 1 is insuff. x=4/3, y=3/2, x=8, y=9.......

Statement 2: (x+y)/y has remainder as 4 this can be written as.......(x/y + 1) as 1 is a whole number the fraction comes from x/y.......which is 4

Hence SUFF.

Ans B

Hey there, Can u please explain concept behind statement 2 : "as 1 is a whole number the fraction comes from x/y.......which is 4" How do you know x/y will always give same remainder?

Statement 1 is insuff. x=4/3, y=3/2, x=8, y=9.......

Statement 2: (x+y)/y has remainder as 4 this can be written as.......(x/y + 1) as 1 is a whole number the fraction comes from x/y.......which is 4

Hence SUFF.

Ans B

Hey there, Can u please explain concept behind statement 2 : "as 1 is a whole number the fraction comes from x/y.......which is 4" How do you know x/y will always give same remainder?

The idea used here is that any number can be written in form of a fraction. (Integers can be the number divided by 1)

eg 0.111 = 111/1000

9.99 = 999/100 = 9 + 99/100 = 9 + 0.99

There are two numbers = x and y Let x be a*y + c (where a and c are integers)

What is the remainder of x/y?

x/y = (a*y + c)/y = a + c/y We see that c is the remainder and a is quotient. We have to find c

Given (x + y) /y has remainder as 4 (x+y)/y => (a*y + c + y)/y => a + c/y + 1 => The quotient is (a+1) and remainder is c. (Already given as 4)

Any whole number will be added to the quotient and not remainder.

(1) Reminder for x/(2y) is 4. (2) Reminder for (x+y)/y is 4.

Answer is (B) this is pretty straightforward.

Statement 1: x= 2y+4 and we also know that we want to find x=4+r so if we equal both we get y+4 = r. We don't know 'y' so not good enough Statement 2: x+y/y remainder is 4. y/y has no remainder so x/y will have remainder 4.

There’s something in Pacific North West that you cannot find anywhere else. The atmosphere and scenic nature are next to none, with mountains on one side and ocean on...

This month I got selected by Stanford GSB to be included in “Best & Brightest, Class of 2017” by Poets & Quants. Besides feeling honored for being part of...

Joe Navarro is an ex FBI agent who was a founding member of the FBI’s Behavioural Analysis Program. He was a body language expert who he used his ability to successfully...