Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 05:49 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 05:49

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 May 2019
Posts: 58
Own Kudos [?]: 385 [10]
Given Kudos: 30
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92912
Own Kudos [?]: 618929 [3]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
BSchool Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 686
Own Kudos [?]: 515 [1]
Given Kudos: 227
Location: India
Concentration: Nonprofit, Sustainability
Schools: ISB '23
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V30
WE:Operations (Non-Profit and Government)
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 May 2019
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [2]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
Re: If x is a non-zero number, Is x|x|<x? (1) −3x<0 (2) x|x|>0 [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Here's what I did:

What I need to find: Is x/|x| < x?
1> -3/x < 0:
=> 3/x > 0 => Doesn't help us understand the value of x/|x| => Insufficient

2> x/|x| > 0
=> x/(-x) > 0 or x/x > 0
=> -1 < 0 or 1 > 0
=> Both statements are correct but still don't give us a value for x/|x| => Insufficient.

Let me know if this method makes sense.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 Oct 2018
Posts: 1878
Own Kudos [?]: 6296 [0]
Given Kudos: 704
Location: India
Send PM
Re: If x is a non-zero number, Is x|x|<x? (1) −3x<0 (2) x|x|>0 [#permalink]
1. When x is negative,
if x/|x|<x is true, x>-1
Range of x =(-1,0)
2. When x is positive
if x/|x|<x is true, x>1
Range of x =(1,∞)

Statement 1- -3/x<0
x can be any positive number
x/|x|<x is true when x>1
x/|x|>x is true when 0<x<1
Insufficient
Statement2- x/|x|>0
Again x can be any positive real number
x/|x|<x is true when x>1
x/|x|>x is true when 0<x<1

Combining statement (1) and (2)
Insufficient, because x>0
Same explanation!!!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 May 2017
Posts: 23
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 34
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, General Management
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Re: If x is a non-zero number, Is x|x|<x? (1) −3x<0 (2) x|x|>0 [#permalink]
Bunuel, could you please explain this.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 May 2017
Posts: 23
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 34
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, General Management
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Re: If x is a non-zero number, Is x|x|<x? (1) −3x<0 (2) x|x|>0 [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
mzaid wrote:
Bunuel, could you please explain this.


If x is a non-zero number, Is \(\frac{x}{|x|}<x?\)

(1)\(\frac{−3}{x}<0\). This implies that x is positive. In this case, |x| = x. So, the question becomes: is \(\frac{x}{x}<x?\)? Or, which is the same: is 1 < x. We just know that x is positive: it can be more or less than 1. Not sufficient.

(2) \(\frac{x}{|x|}>0\). This also implies that x is positive (If x were negative, then we'd get x/(-x) = -1, which is less than 0, not more, as given here). x > 0, implies that |x| = x. So, the question, as above, becomes: is \(\frac{x}{x}<x?\)? Or, which is the same: is 1 < x. We just know that x is positive: it can be more or less than 1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Both statements give the same info: x > 0. If 0 < x <= 1, then the answer to the question will be NO but if x > 1, the answer to the question will be YES. Not sufficient.

Answer: E.



Bunuel, I am not getting the second option. When you say X is negative then wont x/|x|[/fraction] = -x/-x =1. Am I missing anything here.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92912
Own Kudos [?]: 618929 [0]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: If x is a non-zero number, Is x|x|<x? (1) −3x<0 (2) x|x|>0 [#permalink]
Expert Reply
mzaid wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
mzaid wrote:
Bunuel, could you please explain this.


If x is a non-zero number, Is \(\frac{x}{|x|}<x?\)

(1)\(\frac{−3}{x}<0\). This implies that x is positive. In this case, |x| = x. So, the question becomes: is \(\frac{x}{x}<x?\)? Or, which is the same: is 1 < x. We just know that x is positive: it can be more or less than 1. Not sufficient.

(2) \(\frac{x}{|x|}>0\). This also implies that x is positive (If x were negative, then we'd get x/(-x) = -1, which is less than 0, not more, as given here). x > 0, implies that |x| = x. So, the question, as above, becomes: is \(\frac{x}{x}<x?\)? Or, which is the same: is 1 < x. We just know that x is positive: it can be more or less than 1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Both statements give the same info: x > 0. If 0 < x <= 1, then the answer to the question will be NO but if x > 1, the answer to the question will be YES. Not sufficient.

Answer: E.



Bunuel, I am not getting the second option. When you say X is negative then wont x/|x|[/fraction] = -x/-x =1. Am I missing anything here.


No. If x is negative, then |x| = -x, so x/|x| becomes x/(-x).
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 May 2017
Posts: 23
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 34
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, General Management
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Re: If x is a non-zero number, Is x|x|<x? (1) −3x<0 (2) x|x|>0 [#permalink]
Bunuel, Sorry but I dont understand why we are not considering the numerator x as negative. As in first statement the negative x doesn't fulfill the condition, so we considered it positive. What is lacking in my concept here ?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92912
Own Kudos [?]: 618929 [1]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: If x is a non-zero number, Is x|x|<x? (1) −3x<0 (2) x|x|>0 [#permalink]
Expert Reply
mzaid wrote:
Bunuel, Sorry but I dont understand why we are not considering the numerator x as negative. As in first statement the negative x doesn't fulfill the condition, so we considered it positive. What is lacking in my concept here ?


I guess, you asking why we are not changing x to -x, knowing that x is negative. x (in numerator) itself denotes a negative number, so no need to replace it. For example, if given that x + y = 10, and x is negative, are you rewriting this to -x + y = 10?
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32667
Own Kudos [?]: 821 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: If x is a non-zero number, Is x|x|<x? (1) 3x<0 (2) x|x|>0 [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: If x is a non-zero number, Is x|x|<x? (1) 3x<0 (2) x|x|>0 [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92912 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne