Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 05:28 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 05:28

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Status:Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Posts: 396
Own Kudos [?]: 16650 [44]
Given Kudos: 217
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
GPA: 2.9
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92912
Own Kudos [?]: 618926 [29]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 3726
Own Kudos [?]: 16833 [5]
Given Kudos: 165
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Status:Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Posts: 396
Own Kudos [?]: 16650 [1]
Given Kudos: 217
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
GPA: 2.9
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: If x is a positive integer, is x-1 a factor of 104? [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Thanks very much buddy for shedding light on concept of ZERO.
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14822
Own Kudos [?]: 64909 [1]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: If x is a positive integer, is x-1 a factor of 104? [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
enigma123 wrote:
If x is a positive integer, is x – 1 a factor of 104?

(1) x is divisible by 3.
(2) 27 is divisible by x.


104 = 2 * 2 * 2 * 13
So factors of 104 would be combinations of these... 1, 2, 4, 8, 26, etc
For (x-1) to be a factor of 104, it should be one of these.

(1) x is divisible by 3.

x could be 3 so (x - 1) would be 2 - a factor of 104
x could be 6 so (x-1) would be 5 - not a factor of 104
Not sufficient

(2) 27 is divisible by x.

So x can be only 1 or 3 or 9 or 27

x could be 1 so (x - 1) = 0 - not a factor of 104
x could be 3 so (x - 1) = 2 - a factor of 104
Not Sufficient

Using both statements, we see that x can be 3 or 9 or 27 only. So (x-1) will be 2 or 8 or 26. Each one of these is a factor of 104.
Hence, sufficient. (x-1) is a factor of 104.

Answer (C)

For more on factors, check this video and these posts: https://youtu.be/DxIH8rjhpKY
https://anaprep.com/number-properties-f ... -a-number/
https://anaprep.com/number-properties-r ... e-factors/
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2013
Posts: 60
Own Kudos [?]: 28 [0]
Given Kudos: 10
Location: India
Send PM
If x is a positive integer, is x-1 a factor of 104? [#permalink]
Let's take x=30, in this case,
1. A Will be sufficient. However 30-1 is 29 is not a factor of 104.
2. 27 is also not divisible by 30. Not sufficient.

Hence, In this case is the answer E. Can anybody answer my doubt.
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Posts: 3600
Own Kudos [?]: 5425 [0]
Given Kudos: 346
Send PM
If x is a positive integer, is x-1 a factor of 104? [#permalink]
Expert Reply
prashantrchawla wrote:
Let's take x=30, in this case,
1. A Will be sufficient. However 30-1 is 29 is not a factor of 104.
2. 27 is also not divisible by 30. Not sufficient.

Hence, In this case is the answer E. Can anybody answer my doubt.


I am not sure what you are trying to do here.

for statement 1 : you are considering only one value of x, which is making your case sufficient. Take x =3 and x = 6, you will get 104 divisible for x-1 = 2 but not for x-1 = 5.

Hence, it is Insufficient.

Statement 2 : We are given 27 is divisible by x. It means x is a factor of 27. The factors could be 1,3,9 and 27.

Divide 104 by each of (x-1) as 0, 2,8 and 26. You will find 104 divisible by all but 0. hence, insufficient.

On combining, we know that x cannot be 0. Hence, Answer C.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92912
Own Kudos [?]: 618926 [0]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: If x is a positive integer, is x-1 a factor of 104? [#permalink]
Expert Reply
prashantrchawla wrote:
Let's take x=30, in this case,
1. A Will be sufficient. However 30-1 is 29 is not a factor of 104.
2. 27 is also not divisible by 30. Not sufficient.

Hence, In this case is the answer E. Can anybody answer my doubt.


Your logic there is not clear. Why do you take x as 30? You cannot arbitrarily take x to be 30 and work with this value only. Also, how is the first statement sufficient? If x is 3, then x-1=2 and the answer would be YES but if x is 3,000 then the answer would be NO.

Please re-read the solutions above.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 1186
Own Kudos [?]: 2499 [0]
Given Kudos: 459
Location: India
Send PM
Re: If x is a positive integer, is x-1 a factor of 104? [#permalink]
enigma123 wrote:
If x is a positive integer, is x – 1 a factor of 104?

(1) x is divisible by 3.
(2) 27 is divisible by x.


Lets look at the prime factorisation of 104: 2^3 * 13
Thus factors of 104 = 1, 2, 4, 8, 13, 26, 52, 104
We are asked whether x-1 is one of these 8 integers, OR IS x one of these: 2, 3, 5, 9, 14, 27, 53, 105

(1) x is divisible by 3, so x could be any multiple of 3 like 9 or 27 or 54. Insufficient.

(2) 27 is divisible by x, so x is a factor of 27. Now factors of 27 are: 1, 3, 9, 27.
If x is 1, then x-1 is 0 and thus NOT a factor of 104, but if x is 3 or 9 or 27, then x-1 will take values as 2 or 8 or 26 respectively, and thus BE a factor of 104.
So Insufficient.

Combining the two statements, x has to be a multiple of 3, yet a factor of 27 also. So x could be either 3 or 9 or 27. For each of these cases, x-1 will be a factor of 104, as explained in statement 2. Sufficient. Hence C answer
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Nov 2020
Posts: 22
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 27
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Send PM
Re: If x is a positive integer, is x-1 a factor of 104? [#permalink]
Hi Bunuel,
Should we consider division by zero for the GMAT?

I disregarded 1 for this question and hence got B.

Thanks in advance for your response.

Nik
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92912
Own Kudos [?]: 618926 [0]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: If x is a positive integer, is x-1 a factor of 104? [#permalink]
Expert Reply
NikhilJose wrote:
Hi Bunuel,
Should we consider division by zero for the GMAT?

I disregarded 1 for this question and hence got B.

Thanks in advance for your response.

Nik


We are told that x is a positive integer, so x cannot be 0.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Posts: 5343
Own Kudos [?]: 3964 [0]
Given Kudos: 160
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Send PM
If x is a positive integer, is x-1 a factor of 104? [#permalink]
Asked: If x is a positive integer, is x – 1 a factor of 104?

104 = 2*2*2*13 = 2^3*13

(1) x is divisible by 3.
If x = 3; x-1 = 2 is a factor of 104
But if x=6; x-1 = 5 is NOT a factor of 104
NOT SUFFICIENT

(2) 27 is divisible by x.
27 = 3^3
x = {1,3,9,27}
x - 1 = {0,2,8,26}
27 is divisible by {2,8,26} but NOT divisible by 0.
NOT SUFFICIENT

(1) + (2)
(1) x is divisible by 3.
(2) 27 is divisible by x.
x = {3,9,27}
x - 1 = {2,8,26}
104 is divisible by {2,8,26}
SUFFICIENT

IMO C

Originally posted by Kinshook on 24 Jun 2021, 09:28.
Last edited by Kinshook on 02 Jan 2023, 04:25, edited 2 times in total.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Apr 2021
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 93
Send PM
If x is a positive integer, is x-1 a factor of 104? [#permalink]
Hi Kinshook, Bunuel

I am a little confused here. Request your help.

Should we consider 0 (where x=1) a factor since anything divided by zero is undefined?

Knowing that 0 cannot be a factor of any number, is it not possible to automatically discard 1 as of the possibilities and keep the remaining-27,3,9, making St. B sufficient to be the correct answer?

Originally posted by Kriti1055 on 02 Jan 2023, 00:04.
Last edited by Kriti1055 on 02 Jan 2023, 04:33, edited 1 time in total.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92912
Own Kudos [?]: 618926 [0]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: If x is a positive integer, is x-1 a factor of 104? [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Kriti1055 wrote:
Hi Kinshook, Bunuel

I am a little confused here. Request your help.

Should we consider 0 (where x=1) a factor since anything divided by zero is undefined?

Knowing that 0 cannot be a factor of any number, is it not possible to automatically discard 1 as of the possibilities and keep the remaining-27,3,9, making St. B sufficient to answer the correct answer?


(2) says: 27 is divisible by x. So, x can be 1, 3, 9, and 27.

The question asks: is x – 1 a factor of 104?

If x = 1, then the question becomes: is 0 a factor of 104? The answer to this question is NO (0 is NOT a factor of 104).

So, there is no problem for x to be 1, it just gives a NO answer to the question.

Hope it helps.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: If x is a positive integer, is x-1 a factor of 104? [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92912 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne