Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 175

Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Aug 2014, 23:20
manasishah wrote: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x?
A. 51 B. 54 C. 72 D. 162 E. 50!+2 D is the answer. Thanks for the explanation. It is difficult to understand the question when you first read it though.
_________________
......................................................................... +1 Kudos please, if you like my post



Retired Moderator
Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Posts: 349
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
WE: Analyst (Consulting)

If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a fact
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Nov 2014, 02:11
If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x? 1. 51 2. 54 3. 72 4. 162 5. 50!+2
_________________
Appreciate the efforts...KUDOS for all Don't let an extra chromosome get you down..



Intern
Joined: 16 Oct 2014
Posts: 9

Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a fact
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Nov 2014, 02:40
50! is a very large number, but it will not have as factors any primes larger than 50. The first prime larger than 50 is 53, but as x is not a prime lets consider 2x53 = 106 106 factors to 1x2x53 so sum of factors is 1+2+53+106 = 162
That gives D.



Manager
Joined: 21 Jun 2016
Posts: 85
Location: India

Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jul 2016, 07:27
I got answer as 51 and addition of factors as 72. I was so wrong. If there is a category "795+", this qualifies for it. Good Learning in this !!



Intern
Joined: 22 Aug 2016
Posts: 6

Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Nov 2016, 12:22
Extremely helpful Bunnuel. Did not understand VeritasPrep's explanation, but yours is on point. Thanks! Bunuel wrote: brianlange77 wrote: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x?
A. 51 B. 54 C. 72 D. 162 E. 50!+2
Thanks for posting  would be great for you to post the source of the question for easier reference in the future. That said, the factors of 50! are all the numbers from 150. The smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50! is therefore 51. The factors of 51 are 1, 3, 17, and 51. The sum of those four numbers is 72.
Thoughts?
Brian In fact 51=3*17 IS a factor of 50!. The smallest positive integer that is NOT prime and NOT a factor of 50! is 106=2*53. The sum of the factors of 106 is 162. Answer: D.



Manager
Joined: 19 Jul 2016
Posts: 50

what is the sum of the factors of x?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Feb 2017, 05:08
If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x?
ans given is 162,but it has to be 53 ans 1 i.e. 54 pls explain thnx



eGMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 2066

Re: what is the sum of the factors of x?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Feb 2017, 05:42
gupta87 wrote: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x?
ans given is 162,but it has to be 53 ans 1 i.e. 54 pls explain thnx Hey, I presume you did not read the question carefully. x is the smallest positive integer which is not prime. So tell me, can x be 53? Let me know if you still cannot figure out how to approach this. But you should try it again, keeping the above point in mind. Thanks, Saquib Quant Expert eGMATRegister for our Free Session on Number Properties (held every 3rd week) to solve exciting 700+ Level Questions in a classroom environment under the realtime guidance of our Experts
_________________
Register for free sessions Number Properties  Algebra Quant Workshop
Success Stories Guillermo's Success Story  Carrie's Success Story
Ace GMAT quant Articles and Question to reach Q51  Question of the week
Must Read Articles Number Properties – Even Odd  LCM GCD  Statistics1  Statistics2 Word Problems – Percentage 1  Percentage 2  Time and Work 1  Time and Work 2  Time, Speed and Distance 1  Time, Speed and Distance 2 Advanced Topics Permutation and Combination 1  Permutation and Combination 2  Permutation and Combination 3  Probability Geometry Triangles 1  Triangles 2  Triangles 3  Common Mistakes in Geometry Algebra Wavy line  Inequalities Practice Questions Number Properties 1  Number Properties 2  Algebra 1  Geometry  Prime Numbers  Absolute value equations  Sets
 '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub  70 point improvement guarantee  www.egmat.com



Director
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Posts: 639
Location: India
GPA: 3.76

Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Feb 2017, 04:09
gupta87 wrote: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x?
ans given is 162,but it has to be 53 ans 1 i.e. 54 pls explain thnx X should not be prime , so 53 is incorrect value for x ...



Intern
Joined: 06 Jan 2017
Posts: 3
Location: Ukraine

Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Feb 2017, 11:20
Bunuel wrote: gupta87 wrote: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x?
ans given is 162,but it has to be 53 ans 1 i.e. 54 pls explain thnx Merging topics. Please refer to the discussion on page 1. what is the level of this problem? more than 740?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 50000

Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Feb 2017, 11:34



Intern
Joined: 28 Aug 2012
Posts: 2

Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Jun 2017, 17:20
balentina1 wrote: Factors of 50!: 1,2,3,......,50 If x is not a factor of 50! then one of his primes must be bigger than 49 ( the largest prime of 50!). The next prime is 53.Thus x must be a multiple of 53. Since x is not a prime the smallest possible multiple of 53 is 53 * 2 = 106 Sum of his factors: 1+2+53+106 = 162 Hope i helped This reasoning is fallacious because the statement in red ("If x is not a factor of 50! then one of his primes must be bigger than 49") is not true. For example, the numbers 47^2, 11^5, and 2^(48) are not factors of 50!, but none of them have prime factors bigger than 49.



Intern
Joined: 28 Aug 2012
Posts: 2

Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Jun 2017, 20:53
SravnaTestPrep wrote: The first number after n that will not be a factor of n! is the first prime after n. If the number cannot be a prime, then the first number that will not be a factor of n! is the p*2, where p is the first prime after n.
So in our case x will be 53*2=106 and the sum of the factors of 106 is 162. The statement in red is not true for all positive integers n; it holds only when n is at least 6. For example, the smallest composite that is not a factor of 2! is 4, not 2*3 = 6; the smallest composite that is not a factor of 3! is also 4, not 2*5 = 10; the smallest composite that is not a factor of 4! is 9, not 2*5 = 10; and the smallest composite that is not a factor of 5! is again 9, not 2*7 =14.



Director
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 629
Location: India

Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Jun 2017, 21:49
mitharvardtutor wrote: SravnaTestPrep wrote: The first number after n that will not be a factor of n! is the first prime after n. If the number cannot be a prime, then the first number that will not be a factor of n! is the p*2, where p is the first prime after n.
So in our case x will be 53*2=106 and the sum of the factors of 106 is 162. The statement in red is not true for all positive integers n; it holds only when n is at least 6. For example, the smallest composite that is not a factor of 2! is 4, not 2*3 = 6; the smallest composite that is not a factor of 3! is also 4, not 2*5 = 10; the smallest composite that is not a factor of 4! is 9, not 2*5 = 10; and the smallest composite that is not a factor of 5! is again 9, not 2*7 =14. Yes , You are right. The idea is p*2 gives the smallest value after n, both p and 2 being primes. But in the case of 2!, 3!, 4!,5!, the smallest value after n is 2*2, 2*2, 3*3 and 3*3 with 2 and 3 being primes . Thanks for the correction.
_________________
Srinivasan Vaidyaraman Sravna Holistic Solutions http://www.sravnatestprep.com
Holistic and Systematic Approach



Manager
Joined: 02 Feb 2016
Posts: 89

Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Jul 2017, 03:19
Bunuel wrote: brianlange77 wrote: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x?
A. 51 B. 54 C. 72 D. 162 E. 50!+2
Thanks for posting  would be great for you to post the source of the question for easier reference in the future. That said, the factors of 50! are all the numbers from 150. The smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50! is therefore 51. The factors of 51 are 1, 3, 17, and 51. The sum of those four numbers is 72.
Thoughts?
Brian In fact 51=3*17 IS a factor of 50!. The smallest positive integer that is NOT prime and NOT a factor of 50! is 106=2*53. The sum of the factors of 106 is 162. Answer: D. How do we even get to know that of the number 106? What's the underlying method?



Board of Directors
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3622

Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jul 2017, 07:13
TheMastermind wrote: How do we even get to know that of the number 106? What's the underlying method? Hi TheMastermind , We need to find out the number which doesn't have its factors within 50!. The smallest such number should be a prime number > 50 = 53. So, 53 will never divide 50! evenly. But we need to find out the non prime number as well. Let's multiply 53 with 2, you will get 106 as the smallest such number. Now, I know you must be thinking why don't we have any other number between 53 and 106. My friend, take any non prime number. You will get all the factors existing in 50!. The rule is : The smallest such number is the next prime. If they are asking non prime, the answer should be even multiple of that prime. I hope that makes sense.
_________________
My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40 My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub  Importance of an Error Log! Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place  All CR Resources at one place Blog: Subscribe to Question of the Day Blog
GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality  View More. New Visa Forum  Ask all your Visa Related Questions  here.
New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club! Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free Check our new About Us Page here.



Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 471

If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Jan 2018, 08:20
smallest integer x which is not prime and factor of 50! must be = (2 * smallest prime number greater than 50) = (2 * 53) = 106 factors of 106 = {1, 2, 53, 106} => sum of factors = 162 => (D)



Director
Joined: 14 Dec 2017
Posts: 501

Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Oct 2018, 00:18
manasishah wrote: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x?
A. 51 B. 54 C. 72 D. 162 E. 50!+2 Factors of 50! include 1,2,3,.....50, hence x is greater than 50 & not a prime. Our constraints are  not a factor of 50!  not a prime Smallest prime greater than 50 is 53 Smallest composite number that can be formed with 53 as one of the factors is 53 * 2 = 106 Hence x = 106, factors of x are 1, 2, 53, 106 Sum of factors = 1+2+53+106 = 162 Answer D. Thanks, GyM
_________________
New to GMAT Club  https://gmatclub.com/forum/newtogmatclubneedhelp271131.html#p2098335




Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and &nbs
[#permalink]
06 Oct 2018, 00:18



Go to page
Previous
1 2
[ 37 posts ]



