GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 23 May 2019, 22:07

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Posts: 330
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V38
WE: Analyst (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a fact  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Nov 2014, 02:11
1
1
If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x?

1. 51
2. 54
3. 72
4. 162
5. 50!+2
_________________
Appreciate the efforts...KUDOS for all
Don't let an extra chromosome get you down..:P
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2014
Posts: 9
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a fact  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Nov 2014, 02:40
50! is a very large number, but it will not have as factors any primes larger than 50.
The first prime larger than 50 is 53, but as x is not a prime lets consider 2x53 = 106
106 factors to 1x2x53 so sum of factors is 1+2+53+106 = 162

That gives D.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Jun 2016
Posts: 80
Location: India
Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jul 2016, 07:27
I got answer as 51 and addition of factors as 72.
I was so wrong.
If there is a category "795+", this qualifies for it.
Good Learning in this !!
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2016
Posts: 6
Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Nov 2016, 12:22
1
Extremely helpful Bunnuel. Did not understand VeritasPrep's explanation, but yours is on point.
Thanks!

Bunuel wrote:
brianlange77 wrote:
If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x?

A. 51
B. 54
C. 72
D. 162
E. 50!+2

Thanks for posting -- would be great for you to post the source of the question for easier reference in the future. That said, the factors of 50! are all the numbers from 1-50. The smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50! is therefore 51. The factors of 51 are 1, 3, 17, and 51. The sum of those four numbers is 72.

Thoughts?

-Brian


In fact 51=3*17 IS a factor of 50!.

The smallest positive integer that is NOT prime and NOT a factor of 50! is 106=2*53. The sum of the factors of 106 is 162.

Answer: D.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 19 Jul 2016
Posts: 50
Reviews Badge
what is the sum of the factors of x?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Feb 2017, 05:08
If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x?

ans given is 162,but it has to be 53 ans 1 i.e. 54
pls explain
thnx
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
D
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 2873
Re: what is the sum of the factors of x?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Feb 2017, 05:42
gupta87 wrote:
If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x?

ans given is 162,but it has to be 53 ans 1 i.e. 54
pls explain
thnx


Hey,

I presume you did not read the question carefully. x is the smallest positive integer which is not prime.

So tell me, can x be 53? :)

Let me know if you still cannot figure out how to approach this. But you should try it again, keeping the above point in mind. :)

Thanks,
Saquib
Quant Expert
e-GMAT

Register for our Free Session on Number Properties (held every 3rd week) to solve exciting 700+ Level Questions in a classroom environment under the real-time guidance of our Experts :)

Image
_________________
Director
Director
avatar
P
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Posts: 622
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.76
Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Feb 2017, 04:09
gupta87 wrote:
If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x?

ans given is 162,but it has to be 53 ans 1 i.e. 54
pls explain
thnx



X should not be prime , so 53 is incorrect value for x ...
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 06 Jan 2017
Posts: 2
Location: Ukraine
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Feb 2017, 11:20
Bunuel wrote:
gupta87 wrote:
If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x?

ans given is 162,but it has to be 53 ans 1 i.e. 54
pls explain
thnx


Merging topics. Please refer to the discussion on page 1.


what is the level of this problem? more than 740?
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55275
Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Feb 2017, 11:34
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2012
Posts: 2
Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2017, 17:20
balentina1 wrote:
Factors of 50!: 1,2,3,......,50

If x is not a factor of 50! then one of his primes must be bigger than 49 ( the largest prime of 50!).

The next prime is 53.Thus x must be a multiple of 53.

Since x is not a prime the smallest possible multiple of 53 is 53 * 2 = 106

Sum of his factors: 1+2+53+106 = 162

Hope i helped :)


This reasoning is fallacious because the statement in red ("If x is not a factor of 50! then one of his primes must be bigger than 49") is not true. For example, the numbers 47^2, 11^5, and 2^(48) are not factors of 50!, but none of them have prime factors bigger than 49.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2012
Posts: 2
Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2017, 20:53
SravnaTestPrep wrote:
The first number after n that will not be a factor of n! is the first prime after n. If the number cannot be a prime, then the first number that will not be a factor of n! is the p*2, where p is the first prime after n.

So in our case x will be 53*2=106 and the sum of the factors of 106 is 162.


The statement in red is not true for all positive integers n; it holds only when n is at least 6. For example, the smallest composite that is not a factor of 2! is 4, not 2*3 = 6; the smallest composite that is not a factor of 3! is also 4, not 2*5 = 10; the smallest composite that is not a factor of 4! is 9, not 2*5 = 10; and the smallest composite that is not a factor of 5! is again 9, not 2*7 =14.
Director
Director
User avatar
S
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 630
Location: India
Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2017, 21:49
mitharvardtutor wrote:
SravnaTestPrep wrote:
The first number after n that will not be a factor of n! is the first prime after n. If the number cannot be a prime, then the first number that will not be a factor of n! is the p*2, where p is the first prime after n.

So in our case x will be 53*2=106 and the sum of the factors of 106 is 162.


The statement in red is not true for all positive integers n; it holds only when n is at least 6. For example, the smallest composite that is not a factor of 2! is 4, not 2*3 = 6; the smallest composite that is not a factor of 3! is also 4, not 2*5 = 10; the smallest composite that is not a factor of 4! is 9, not 2*5 = 10; and the smallest composite that is not a factor of 5! is again 9, not 2*7 =14.


Yes , You are right. The idea is p*2 gives the smallest value after n, both p and 2 being primes. But in the case of 2!, 3!, 4!,5!, the smallest value after n is 2*2, 2*2, 3*3 and 3*3 with 2 and 3 being primes . Thanks for the correction.
_________________
Srinivasan Vaidyaraman
Sravna Test Prep
http://www.sravnatestprep.com

Holistic and Systematic Approach
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Feb 2016
Posts: 88
GMAT 1: 690 Q43 V41
Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2017, 03:19
Bunuel wrote:
brianlange77 wrote:
If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x?

A. 51
B. 54
C. 72
D. 162
E. 50!+2

Thanks for posting -- would be great for you to post the source of the question for easier reference in the future. That said, the factors of 50! are all the numbers from 1-50. The smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50! is therefore 51. The factors of 51 are 1, 3, 17, and 51. The sum of those four numbers is 72.

Thoughts?

-Brian


In fact 51=3*17 IS a factor of 50!.

The smallest positive integer that is NOT prime and NOT a factor of 50! is 106=2*53. The sum of the factors of 106 is 162.

Answer: D.


How do we even get to know that of the number 106? What's the underlying method?
Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3631
Reviews Badge
Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jul 2017, 07:13
1
TheMastermind wrote:
How do we even get to know that of the number 106? What's the underlying method?


Hi TheMastermind ,

We need to find out the number which doesn't have its factors within 50!.

The smallest such number should be a prime number > 50 = 53.

So, 53 will never divide 50! evenly. But we need to find out the non prime number as well. Let's multiply 53 with 2, you will get 106 as the smallest such number.

Now, I know you must be thinking why don't we have any other number between 53 and 106.

My friend, take any non prime number. You will get all the factors existing in 50!.

The rule is : The smallest such number is the next prime. If they are asking non prime, the answer should be even multiple of that prime.

I hope that makes sense. :)
_________________
My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place
Blog: Subscribe to Question of the Day Blog
GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.
New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!
Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free
Check our new About Us Page here.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 477
Location: India
Schools: XLRI"20
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.5
If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jan 2018, 08:20
smallest integer x which is not prime and factor of 50! must be = (2 * smallest prime number greater than 50) = (2 * 53) = 106
factors of 106 = {1, 2, 53, 106} => sum of factors = 162 => (D)
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 14 Dec 2017
Posts: 522
Location: India
Premium Member
Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Oct 2018, 00:18
manasishah wrote:
If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x?

A. 51
B. 54
C. 72
D. 162
E. 50!+2


Factors of 50! include 1,2,3,.....50, hence x is greater than 50 & not a prime.

Our constraints are
- not a factor of 50!
- not a prime

Smallest prime greater than 50 is 53

Smallest composite number that can be formed with 53 as one of the factors is 53 * 2 = 106

Hence x = 106, factors of x are 1, 2, 53, 106

Sum of factors = 1+2+53+106 = 162


Answer D.


Thanks,
GyM
_________________
Target Test Prep Representative
User avatar
D
Status: Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Posts: 6228
Location: United States (CA)
Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Oct 2018, 18:23
manasishah wrote:
If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x?

A. 51
B. 54
C. 72
D. 162
E. 50!+2


The smallest positive integer that is not a factor of 50! is 53 since 53 is a prime. However, since we don’t want the number to be a prime, we can multiply 53 by 2 and obtain 106, and 106 will be the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!.

The sum of the factors of 106 is 106 + 1 + 53 + 2 = 162.

Answer: D
_________________

Scott Woodbury-Stewart

Founder and CEO

Scott@TargetTestPrep.com
TTP - Target Test Prep Logo
122 Reviews

5-star rated online GMAT quant
self study course

See why Target Test Prep is the top rated GMAT quant course on GMAT Club. Read Our Reviews

If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Kudos" button.

GMAT Club Bot
Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and   [#permalink] 18 Oct 2018, 18:23

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 37 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.