Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 10:52 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 10:52

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 189 [179]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92914
Own Kudos [?]: 618976 [36]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Posts: 21846
Own Kudos [?]: 11665 [26]
Given Kudos: 450
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 01 Jul 2013
Posts: 187
Own Kudos [?]: 41 [10]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and [#permalink]
5
Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
I'll start the answer process for you....

-51 has factors of 3 and 17, so that's out, because those are both factors of 50!
-52 has factors of 2 (twice) and 13, so that's out...
-53 is not a factor of 50!, but it's prime :-(
-But, 106 (which is 2*53) is the next smallest choice (any other non-factors between 53 and 106 would also be prime, violating the terms of the problem.)

Thoughts?
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Nov 2013
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 19 [13]
Given Kudos: 20
Send PM
Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and [#permalink]
9
Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Factors of 50!: 1,2,3,......,50

If x is not a factor of 50! then one of his primes must be bigger than 49 ( the largest prime of 50!).

The next prime is 53.Thus x must be a multiple of 53.

Since x is not a prime the smallest possible multiple of 53 is 53 * 2 = 106

Sum of his factors: 1+2+53+106 = 162

Hope i helped :)
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Aug 2013
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 19
Send PM
If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and [#permalink]
If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x?
A. 51
B. 54
C. 72
D. 162
E. 50!+2

This question has been discussed before, but I could not understand something from Bunuel's reply.
he said
In fact 51=3*17 IS a factor of 50!.
The smallest positive integer that is NOT prime and NOT a factor of 50! is 106=2*53. The sum of the factors of 106 is 162.

I understand that 53 is not factor of 50! since it is prime,, so multiplying by 2 make 53 not prime and not factor of 50! as well.
But, can someone explain how we can tell that none between 53 and 106 is not factor of 50!?
Is it becuase only prime numbers greater than 50 is not factors of 50!
so the smallest prime greater than 50 is 53 and thus 106 is smallest ineter that is NOT prime and NOT a factor of 50!?

Let me know please.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92914
Own Kudos [?]: 618976 [2]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
sehosayho wrote:
If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x?
A. 51
B. 54
C. 72
D. 162
E. 50!+2

This question has been discussed before, but I could not understand something from Bunuel's reply.
he said
In fact 51=3*17 IS a factor of 50!.
The smallest positive integer that is NOT prime and NOT a factor of 50! is 106=2*53. The sum of the factors of 106 is 162.

I understand that 53 is not factor of 50! since it is prime,, so multiplying by 2 make 53 not prime and not factor of 50! as well.
But, can someone explain how we can tell that none between 53 and 106 is not factor of 50!?
Is it becuase only prime numbers greater than 50 is not factors of 50!
so the smallest prime greater than 50 is 53 and thus 106 is smallest ineter that is NOT prime and NOT a factor of 50!?

Let me know please.


All numbers between 50 and 106, are either primes (and we know that x is NOT a prime) or factors of 50!, because it has all their primes in higher powers. For example:

59 is a prime, hence x cannot be 59.
60 = 2^2*3*5. 50! will for sure have 2, 3, and 5 in higher power than 2, 1 and 1, respectively.

Hope it's clear.

P.S. Please do not double post a topic, put your questions in existing one. Thank you.
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 589
Own Kudos [?]: 1519 [4]
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Send PM
If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and [#permalink]
4
Kudos
Expert Reply
The first number after n that will not be a factor of n! is the first prime after n. If the number cannot be a prime, then the first number that will not be a factor of n! is the p*2, where p is the first prime after n.

So in our case x will be 53*2=106 and the sum of the factors of 106 is 162.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Jul 2016
Posts: 40
Own Kudos [?]: 92 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
Send PM
what is the sum of the factors of x? [#permalink]
If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x?

ans given is 162,but it has to be 53 ans 1 i.e. 54
pls explain
thnx
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 3726
Own Kudos [?]: 16837 [0]
Given Kudos: 165
Send PM
Re: what is the sum of the factors of x? [#permalink]
Expert Reply
gupta87 wrote:
If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x?

ans given is 162,but it has to be 53 ans 1 i.e. 54
pls explain
thnx


Hey,

I presume you did not read the question carefully. x is the smallest positive integer which is not prime.

So tell me, can x be 53? :)

Let me know if you still cannot figure out how to approach this. But you should try it again, keeping the above point in mind. :)

Thanks,
Saquib
Quant Expert
e-GMAT

Register for our Free Session on Number Properties (held every 3rd week) to solve exciting 700+ Level Questions in a classroom environment under the real-time guidance of our Experts :)

Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 18761
Own Kudos [?]: 22052 [1]
Given Kudos: 283
Location: United States (CA)
Send PM
Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
manasishah wrote:
If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!, what is the sum of the factors of x?

A. 51
B. 54
C. 72
D. 162
E. 50!+2


The smallest positive integer that is not a factor of 50! is 53 since 53 is a prime. However, since we don’t want the number to be a prime, we can multiply 53 by 2 and obtain 106, and 106 will be the smallest positive integer that is not prime and not a factor of 50!.

The sum of the factors of 106 is 106 + 1 + 53 + 2 = 162.

Answer: D
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Jul 2020
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 27
Send PM
Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and [#permalink]
1
Kudos
If the factors of 51 (3 and 17) are also factors of 50, doesn't that imply that the factor 2 of 106 (2 and 53), is also a factor of 50?
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Posts: 21846
Own Kudos [?]: 11665 [0]
Given Kudos: 450
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and [#permalink]
Expert Reply
salphonso wrote:
If the factors of 51 (3 and 17) are also factors of 50, doesn't that imply that the factor 2 of 106 (2 and 53), is also a factor of 50?


Hi salphonso,

50! = (50)(49)(48)....(3)(2)(1)

Thus, any of those 50 numbers is a factor of 50! AND any number that can be created by multiplying any combination of those numbers together (or any of the factors of those numbers together) will ALSO be a factor.

Thus, 51 IS a factor of 50! because 51 = (3)(17).... and both 3 and 17 are factors of 50!

106 = (2)(53).... but while 2 is a factor of 50!, 53 is NOT a factor. It is not among those 50 integers and there is no way to get to 53 by multiplying any of those numbers (or their factors) together. The smallest number that is NOT prime and NOT a factor of 50! is 106.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32675
Own Kudos [?]: 822 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: If x is the smallest positive integer that is not prime and [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
92914 posts
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne