It is currently 13 Dec 2017, 07:15

# Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Ross R1 | Kellogg R1 | Darden R1 | Tepper R1

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 192

Kudos [?]: 22 [1], given: 4

If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2010, 18:31
1
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

72% (00:46) correct 28% (00:40) wrong based on 562 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

If xyz > 0, is x > 0?

(1) xy > 0
(2) xz > 0
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 22 [1], given: 4

VP
Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 1466

Kudos [?]: 312 [4], given: 31

Re: If XYZ>0 is X>0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2010, 20:12
4
KUDOS
DestinyChild wrote:
If XYZ>0 is X>0

XY > 0
XZ > 0

Obviously the answer is Yes or No;
Get your kudos for reasoning out why the answer is C and keep an eye on time too

Triple kudos for someone suggesting quicker technique for DS stems with triple variables...!

xy > 0 both are positive or both negative
xz > 0 both are positive or both negative

if x < 0 then z < 0 and y < 0 but xyz < 0 so this doesn't work
if x > 0 then y > 0 and z > 0 and xyz > 0 so this works and x > 0

Kudos [?]: 312 [4], given: 31

Manager
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 192

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 4

Re: If XYZ>0 is X>0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2010, 20:29
cheers lagomez

will give you one...!

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 4

Director
Status: No dream is too large, no dreamer is too small
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 603

Kudos [?]: 1168 [0], given: 39

Re: If XYZ>0 is X>0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2011, 08:51
1) x and y both are positive or negative, so x could be -ve, or +ve insuff.
2) x and z both are positive or negative, so x could be -ve, or +ve insuff.

For C
as xyz > 0, so if y and z both -ve, then x has to be +ve, and
if y and z become +ve then x has to be +ve to become xyz > 0.
_________________

Collections:-
PSof OG solved by GC members: http://gmatclub.com/forum/collection-ps-with-solution-from-gmatclub-110005.html
DS of OG solved by GC members: http://gmatclub.com/forum/collection-ds-with-solution-from-gmatclub-110004.html
100 GMAT PREP Quantitative collection http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-problem-collections-114358.html
Collections of work/rate problems with solutions http://gmatclub.com/forum/collections-of-work-rate-problem-with-solutions-118919.html
Mixture problems in a file with best solutions: http://gmatclub.com/forum/mixture-problems-with-best-and-easy-solutions-all-together-124644.html

Kudos [?]: 1168 [0], given: 39

Intern
Joined: 29 Mar 2011
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: 4 [2], given: 0

Re: If XYZ>0 is X>0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2011, 10:54
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Following chart lists down the possible scenarios in which XYZ > 0

X Y Z
1) - - +
2) - + -
3) + - -
4) + + +

As per statement I --> 1 & 4 have to be true for XY > 0. So I alone is insufficient as X can be +ve or -ve
As per statement II --> 2& 4 have to be true for XZ > 0 So II alone is insufficient as X can be +ve or -ve
If we combine both statements then only 4 is true and X has to be +ve

Hence C.

Kudos [?]: 4 [2], given: 0

GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1347

Kudos [?]: 2043 [2], given: 6

Re: If XYZ>0 is X>0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2011, 12:43
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
DestinyChild wrote:
If XYZ>0 is X>0

XY > 0
XZ > 0

Obviously the answer is Yes or No;
Get your kudos for reasoning out why the answer is C and keep an eye on time too

Triple kudos for someone suggesting quicker technique for DS stems with triple variables...!

Certainly each statement is not sufficient alone (the logic is identical for each: for S1, x and y can both be negative or both positive, and for S2, x and z can both be negative or both positive). You might notice that S1 tells us z is positive, and S2 tells us y is positive, but that's not what we're looking for.

Now, together, the inequality xy > 0 means 'x and y have the same sign'. So from the two statements we know x and y have the same sign, and x and z have the same sign, so x, y and z all have the same sign. If xyz > 0, they must all be positive, and the answer is C.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

Kudos [?]: 2043 [2], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
Posts: 183

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 18

Re: If XYZ>0 is X>0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2011, 17:41
C. For XYZ > 0 either all are positive or two of them negative. From St1 and St2 it is clear that both xy and xz has to be positive or both xz and xy has to be negative. in the latter case XYZ > 0 will be false.

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 18

TOEFL Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1586

Kudos [?]: 607 [1], given: 40

Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Re: If XYZ>0 is X>0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2011, 21:53
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
XYZ > 0 => X > 0 and YZ > 0 OR x < 0 and YZ < 0

(1)

XY > 0 means x > 0 and Y > 0 OR X < 0 and Y < 0

So (1) is not sufficient

(2)

XZ > 0 means X > 0 and Z > 0 OR X < 0 and Z < 0

So (2) is not sufficient

So if x < 0 then y < 0 and z < 0

=> xyz < 0 which is contrary to what is given in question

=> x > 0

_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 607 [1], given: 40

Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 14874

Kudos [?]: 287 [0], given: 0

Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2013, 07:29
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 287 [0], given: 0

Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 14874

Kudos [?]: 287 [0], given: 0

Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2014, 09:21
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 287 [0], given: 0

Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 14874

Kudos [?]: 287 [0], given: 0

Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jan 2016, 20:53
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 287 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 43

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 33

Location: Brazil
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 640 Q39 V38
GMAT 2: 700 Q47 V38
Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2016, 09:38
This one is pure fun!

xyz>0 this means that we need two number with same sign and the Notre number must be positive. otherwise we would get a negative number.

1-xy>0
Both x and y are positive or negative. NS

2-xz>0
Both x and y are positive or negative. NS

1 and 2 - xz>0 and xy>0 - SUFFICIENT
Lets assume that x is negative: if x is negative, then y must be negative and z must be negative. This would result in a negative number. This is not possible.
So we are sure that X is positive.

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 33

Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 4467

Kudos [?]: 3145 [0], given: 0

GPA: 3.82
Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Feb 2016, 04:57
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

If xyz > 0, is x > 0?

(1) xy > 0
(2) xz > 0

When you modify the original condition and the question, they become xyz>0 -> x>0? -> yz>0?. There are 3 variables(x,y,z) and 1 equation(xyz>0), which should match with the number of equations. So, you need 2 more equations. For 1) 1 equation, for 2) 1 equation, which is likely to make C the answer.
When 1) & 2), they become x(y^2)z>0. When dividing x(y^2)z>0 with y^2, it becomes yz>0, which is yes and sufficient.

l For cases where we need 2 more equations, such as original conditions with “2 variables”, or “3 variables and 1 equation”, or “4 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 70% chance that C is the answer, while E has 25% chance. These two are the majority. In case of common mistake type 3,4, the answer may be from A, B or D but there is only 5% chance. Since C is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition (It saves us time). Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, D or E.
_________________

MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spare
The one-and-only World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy.
Find a 10% off coupon code for GMAT Club members.
“Receive 5 Math Questions & Solutions Daily”
Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons - try it yourself

Kudos [?]: 3145 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 19 May 2016
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: 2 [1], given: 0

Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 May 2016, 01:26
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I solved this question "algebraically":

Question: xyz > 0 => x>0

(1) if xy > 0
dividing xyz > 0 by xy (inequality sign is not flipped)
=> z > 0 insufficient

(2) if xz > 0
dividing xyz > 0 by xz (inequality sign is not flipped)
=> y > 0 insufficient

(1&2) if z,y > 0
diving xyz > 0 by yz (inequality sign is not flipped)
=> x>0 sufficient

Is this a valid approach?

Kudos [?]: 2 [1], given: 0

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42582

Kudos [?]: 135493 [0], given: 12696

Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 May 2016, 02:16
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
benni089 wrote:
I solved this question "algebraically":

Question: xyz > 0 => x>0

(1) if xy > 0
dividing xyz > 0 by xy (inequality sign is not flipped)
=> z > 0 insufficient

(2) if xz > 0
dividing xyz > 0 by xz (inequality sign is not flipped)
=> y > 0 insufficient

(1&2) if z,y > 0
diving xyz > 0 by yz (inequality sign is not flipped)
=> x>0 sufficient

Is this a valid approach?

Yes, that's a valid approach.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 135493 [0], given: 12696

Current Student
Joined: 02 May 2015
Posts: 260

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 23

Location: South Africa
GPA: 3.49
WE: Web Development (Insurance)
Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 May 2016, 04:06
xyz > 0
x > 0?

Stem: yz ? 0

a) xz > 0 : Says nothing about y
b) xy > 0 : says nothing about z

Combining both L

a * b ( Since both are + ve)

x^2 * yz > 0

x^2 always positive. So yz > 0.

_________________

Kudos if I helped

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 23

Manager
Joined: 03 Jan 2015
Posts: 86

Kudos [?]: 62 [1], given: 146

Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 May 2016, 13:06
1
KUDOS
DestinyChild wrote:
If xyz > 0, is x > 0?

(1) xy > 0
(2) xz > 0

(1) xy > 0 --> If xy > 0, x can be both positive or negative but z has to be greater than 0
(2) xz > 0 --> If xz > 0, x can be both positive or negative but y has to be greater than 0

If z and y have to be greater than 0 then x has to be greater than 0 for xyz to be true.

Kudos [?]: 62 [1], given: 146

Director
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 645

Kudos [?]: 389 [1], given: 36

GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2016, 12:28
1
KUDOS
DestinyChild wrote:
If xyz > 0, is x > 0?

(1) xy > 0
(2) xz > 0

If xyz > 0, is x > 0?
The only way for xyz to be positive all three are positive (x is +ve ; y is +ve and z is +ve)
Or Only two of them are negative and one is positive

(1) xy > 0
x can be negative ; y can be negative (or both x and y positive)
INSUFFICIENT

(2) xz > 0
x can be negative ; z can be negative (or both x and z positive)
INSUFFICIENT

MERGING BOTH
x, y, z are all positive {therefore x is positive}
x,y,z are all negative {therefore x is negative}; BUT ALL THREE CANNOT BE NEGATIVE; OTHERWISE INFO IN THE QUESTION STEM WILL BECOME INCORRECT. xyz>0
So, x y z can only be positive

_________________

Posting an answer without an explanation is "GOD COMPLEX". The world doesn't need any more gods. Please explain you answers properly.
FINAL GOODBYE :- 17th SEPTEMBER 2016. .. 16 March 2017 - I am back but for all purposes please consider me semi-retired.

Kudos [?]: 389 [1], given: 36

Director
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 690

Kudos [?]: 253 [1], given: 855

Location: United States
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2017, 18:01
1
KUDOS
xyz > 0 in two cases:
1. all the numbers are positive.
2. two of the numbers are negative and the other is positve.

st 1:
xy > 0
This statement is insufficient because x could be positive or negative to make it work.
It does give a useful piece of information though:
if x and y are both postive, xy > 0 and therefore z would have to also be positve to make xyz > 0.
or
if x and y are both negative, xy > 0 and therefore z would have to be positve to make xyz > 0.

Basically, the statement is saying that z must be positive.

st 2:
xz > 0
This statement is insufficient because x could be positive or negative to make it work.
It does give a useful piece of information though:
if x and z are both postive, xz > 0 and therefore y would have to also be positve to make xyz > 0.
or
if x and z are both negative, xz > 0 and therefore y would have to be positve to make xyz > 0.

Basically, the statement is saying that y must be positive.

Combined
From the two statements we know that z must be positive (st 1) and y must be postive (st 2).
If y and z are both positive, the only way that xyz will be > 0 is if x is positive or x > 0.

Therefore C.
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Kudos [?]: 253 [1], given: 855

Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 183

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 179

Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 4
Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2017, 23:00
Bunuel wrote:
benni089 wrote:
I solved this question "algebraically":

Question: xyz > 0 => x>0

(1) if xy > 0
dividing xyz > 0 by xy (inequality sign is not flipped)
=> z > 0 insufficient

(2) if xz > 0
dividing xyz > 0 by xz (inequality sign is not flipped)
=> y > 0 insufficient

(1&2) if z,y > 0
diving xyz > 0 by yz (inequality sign is not flipped)
=> x>0 sufficient

Is this a valid approach?

Yes, that's a valid approach.

Hi Bunuel,

I have a doubt over here (Sorry if it is lame but I somehow can't wrap my head around it)

We can only divide two inequalities if both sides(LHS and RHS) of the two inequalities are positive and signs of inequalities(if one has > other should have < and vice versa) are opposite.

With the above concept, how can we divide xyz>0 by xy>0 ?
i. The Inequality sign is not opposite in both the inequalities
ii. RHS in both the above inequalities is 0 (it's not positive)

I know somewhere I am wrong above, need your help to clarify my doubt. Thanks in advance

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 179

Re: If xyz > 0, is x > 0? (1) xy > 0 (2) xz > 0   [#permalink] 31 Aug 2017, 23:00

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by