Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 May 2017, 12:39

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If Z is a positive integer, x*z=0? 1) x*z=-3x 2) x*z=3x

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Dec 2004
Posts: 272
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

If Z is a positive integer, x*z=0? 1) x*z=-3x 2) x*z=3x [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 May 2005, 20:37
This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

If Z is a positive integer, x*z=0?
1) x*z=-3x
2) x*z=3x
VP
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 1115
Location: London, UK
Schools: Tuck'08
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 May 2005, 21:44
a good one, i am not so sure

in statement 1 we know that Z is a positive integer so there is no way Z=-3, the only solution is that Z is equal to any positive number but that X=0 so XZ=0 -> suff

in statement 2, Z could be for example 3 and X could also be 3. Not suff
VP
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 1486
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 May 2005, 22:31
Antmavel wrote:
a good one, i am not so sure, I would answer A
in statement 1 we know that Z is a positive integer so there is no way Z=-3, the only solution is that Z is equal to any positive number but that X=0 so XZ=0 -> suff. in statement 2, Z could be for example 3 and X could also be 3. Not suff

If Z is a positive integer, x*z=0?
1) x*z=-3x
2) x*z=3x

Answer should be A, but this is one of the poorly worded question because it is not possible to have x*z=-3x = 3x without combining i and ii. to satisfy booth statement x must be o and ETS doesnot ask such question. only after combining both, we know that x = o. therefore no wonder if OA is C.
CIO
Joined: 09 Mar 2003
Posts: 463
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 May 2005, 08:17
MA wrote:
Antmavel wrote:
a good one, i am not so sure, I would answer A
in statement 1 we know that Z is a positive integer so there is no way Z=-3, the only solution is that Z is equal to any positive number but that X=0 so XZ=0 -> suff. in statement 2, Z could be for example 3 and X could also be 3. Not suff

If Z is a positive integer, x*z=0?
1) x*z=-3x
2) x*z=3x

Answer should be A, but this is one of the poorly worded question because it is not possible to have x*z=-3x = 3x without combining i and ii. to satisfy booth statement x must be o and ETS doesnot ask such question. only after combining both, we know that x = o. therefore no wonder if OA is C.

I'm not so sure it's a bad question. Certainly it's confusing. But if * is a special function, then we don't know anything about the relationship of x and z. Maybe from one we could learn that * means "lose z and multiply by negative 3".

Either way, with C we see that 3x = -3x, and only zero could make that work.
VP
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1436
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 May 2005, 13:35
"A"

I don't see any ambiguity in this ques, perhaps I am missing something

state 1....x*z + 3x = 0

x(z+3) = 0........so solutions are x = 0 or z = -3 or x = 0 and
z = -3..but Z > 0....so only X can be 0.....so X*Z = 0

state 2....x*z - 3x = 0

x(z-3) = 0......X = 0 or Z= 3 or X=0 and Z = 3.....insuff
VP
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 1486
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 May 2005, 18:12
banerjeea_98 wrote:
"A". I don't see any ambiguity in this ques, perhaps I am missing something

in isolation, that is ok. but if you see the question in totality, seems something wired.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5045
Location: Singapore
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 376 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Dec 2005, 19:59
If z is positive, the only way x*z can be 0 is for x to be 0. So the question is really asking Is x 0?

(1) x*z = -3x --> tells us x = -x since z is positive. So x must be 0. Sufficient.
(2) z=3. Doesn't really tells us anything. x can be 0 and x*z = 3x. Or x can be any value and still satisfy statement 2.

Ans: A
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2005
Posts: 485
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Dec 2005, 20:38
ywilfred wrote:
If z is positive, the only way x*z can be 0 is for x to be 0. So the question is really asking Is x 0?

(1) x*z = -3x --> tells us x = -x since z is positive. So x must be 0. Sufficient.
(2) z=3. Doesn't really tells us anything. x can be 0 and x*z = 3x. Or x can be any value and still satisfy statement 2.

Ans: A

Agreed... good explanation
19 Dec 2005, 20:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by