It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 17:17

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Impact craters caused by meteorites smashing into Earth have

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 474

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Impact craters caused by meteorites smashing into Earth have [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Mar 2006, 19:02
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Impact craters caused by meteorites smashing into Earth have been found all around the globe, but they have been found in the greatest density in geologically stable regions. This relatively greater abundance of securely identified crater in geologically stable regions must be explained by the lower rates of destructive geophysical processes in those regions.
The conclusion is properly drawn if which one of the following is assumed?
(A) A meteorite that strikes exactly the same spot as an earlier meteorite will obliterate all traces of the earlier impact.
(B) Rates of destructive geophysical processes within any given region vary markedly throughout geological time.
(C) The rate at which the Earth is struck by meteorites has greatly increased in geologically recent times.
(D) Actual meteorite impacts have been scattered fairly evenly over the Earthâ€™s surface in the course of Earthâ€™s geological history.
(E) The Earthâ€™s geologically stable regions have been studied more intensively by geologists than have its less stable regions.

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Sep 2004
Posts: 257

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Location: New York City, USA

### Show Tags

07 Mar 2006, 21:22
The author is trying to prove that "the geologically stable regions has lower rates of destructive geophysical processes than in any other regions". The reason he sites for this is the greater density of craters. But if most of the craters had smashed into the earth in that region alone, then the arguement will fail. D does the opposite.

My answer choice would be D.

- Vipin

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1115

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 1

Location: India

### Show Tags

07 Mar 2006, 21:24
I will pick D for this.
In the problem it is concluded that :
' must be explained by the lower rates of destructive geophysical processes in those regions '
D states that ' Actual meteorite impacts have been scattered fairly evenly over the Earthâ€™s surface '.
This means that due to lack of destructive geophysical processes in stable regions ,the craters could be identified as compared to other unstable regions where destructive geophysical processes might have removed their traces.

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 1

Director
Joined: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 621

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2006, 10:12
^ D ^

The argument says that craters have been created all over the earth, however, the geophysical destructions wore away their tracks in geologically active places. So, in geologically stable places it is more common to see craters.

If we assume D the conlusion in the argument works, because it puts forward the difference between geologically stable and active places.

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2005
Posts: 99

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2006, 16:07
IMO D

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 19 Dec 2004
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2006, 16:19

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1111

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 0

Location: CA

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2006, 17:04
vipin7um wrote:
The author is trying to prove that "the geologically stable regions has lower rates of destructive geophysical processes than in any other regions". The reason he sites for this is the greater density of craters. But if most of the craters had smashed into the earth in that region alone, then the arguement will fail. D does the opposite.

My answer choice would be D.

- Vipin

Nice. D is good here.

If we negate D conclusion no longer hold.
_________________

Whether you think you can or think you can't. You're right! - Henry Ford (1863 - 1947)

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 474

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2006, 14:37
OA is D

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

09 Mar 2006, 14:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by